Effectiveness Of Parole And Probation In Finland
Effectiveness of Parole and Probation in Finland
In Finland, parole and probation are essential components of the criminal justice system, aimed at rehabilitating offenders and reducing recidivism, while also ensuring public safety. Finland’s approach to criminal justice is largely focused on rehabilitation rather than punishment, which makes the use of parole and probation integral to this system.
1. Parole in Finland
Parole refers to the conditional release of a prisoner before their full sentence is served, under certain conditions. In Finland, parole is typically available after a prisoner has served half of their sentence (though the specific time varies depending on the type of crime and sentence length).
The conditions for parole include:
Good behavior during incarceration
Rehabilitation progress, including participation in work, education, or therapy
Risk assessment to determine whether the offender is likely to re-offend
Post-release supervision by a parole officer to monitor compliance with conditions (e.g., no further crimes, no contact with certain individuals)
2. Probation in Finland
Probation in Finland is a form of non-custodial sentencing where the offender is allowed to serve their sentence in the community, rather than in prison. Probation can be applied:
As a substitute for imprisonment for less serious crimes.
As an additional measure after serving part of a custodial sentence (e.g., after a parole hearing).
Probation typically involves:
Regular reporting to a probation officer
Community service or work requirements
Therapeutic programs (e.g., for addiction, anger management)
Supervision and guidance from probation officers
Key Features of the Finnish Parole and Probation System
Restorative justice principles: Focus on rehabilitation, reintegration, and reducing the likelihood of reoffending.
Individualized assessments: Every inmate or probationer is assessed to create a personalized rehabilitation plan.
Community-based reintegration: Support for reintegration into society, including employment, housing, and family support.
Case Law: Parole and Probation in Finland
Below are several landmark cases illustrating the use and effectiveness of parole and probation in Finland’s criminal justice system.
Case 1: KKO 2012:64 – Parole in the Context of Serious Crimes
Court: Supreme Court of Finland (KKO)
Facts:
The defendant was serving a sentence for a serious violent crime (e.g., aggravated assault) and had served over half of their sentence.
The defendant applied for parole based on good behavior during incarceration and engagement in a rehabilitation program.
The parole board had to decide whether the offender posed a danger to society upon release.
Ruling:
The court emphasized that parole should not be granted automatically but must be based on a thorough risk assessment.
In this case, the parole was denied, as the board concluded the offender still posed a risk of re-offending due to unresolved violent tendencies.
Significance:
This case highlighted the risk-based approach to parole decisions in Finland, where the offender's potential for reintegration into society and the danger to public safety are paramount.
The ruling reinforced the principle that parole is a privilege, not a right, and can be denied for offenders who do not show sufficient evidence of rehabilitation.
Case 2: KKO 2014:53 – Probation and Substance Abuse
Court: Supreme Court of Finland (KKO)
Facts:
A defendant convicted of drug-related offenses applied for probation after serving part of their custodial sentence.
During incarceration, the defendant participated in a substance abuse rehabilitation program and showed significant improvement in their behavior and attitude.
The probation officers reported that the offender had a stable support network outside of prison and had secured employment.
Ruling:
The court granted probation, finding that the offender had demonstrated a commitment to rehabilitation and successful reintegration into society.
Conditions for probation included regular check-ins with a probation officer, participation in ongoing drug rehabilitation programs, and random drug testing.
Significance:
This case underscored the importance of rehabilitation programs in Finland’s probation system.
It also showed that successful rehabilitation can lead to parole or probation, especially when there is evidence that the individual is no longer a danger to society.
Case 3: Rovaniemi District Court, 2015 – Parole for Juvenile Offenders
Court: Rovaniemi District Court
Facts:
A juvenile offender convicted of theft and aggravated robbery sought parole after serving half of their sentence.
The offender had shown significant progress in their rehabilitation, including completing educational courses and engaging in counseling for anger management.
The probation officers and psychologists involved in the offender’s rehabilitation plan recommended parole.
Ruling:
The court granted parole based on the juvenile’s rehabilitation progress and the findings that the offender no longer posed a risk to society.
The court emphasized that young offenders are often more rehabilitable and that early intervention and rehabilitation are critical.
Significance:
This case highlighted the importance of early intervention and support for juvenile offenders in Finland.
It also demonstrated that parole decisions for juveniles are often more lenient, with a focus on reintegrating young offenders into society rather than punishment.
Case 4: KKO 2017:42 – Revocation of Parole
Court: Supreme Court of Finland (KKO)
Facts:
An individual granted parole for a non-violent crime violated the conditions of parole by failing to report to their probation officer and re-engaging in criminal activity.
The individual had been on parole for 6 months, with conditions that included regular reporting, no contact with previous criminal associates, and attendance at rehabilitation programs.
Ruling:
The court revoked the parole, noting that the offender had not complied with the conditions set for their release.
The court emphasized that breaching parole conditions indicates non-rehabilitation and undermines the principles of parole.
Significance:
This case reaffirmed that parole is contingent on compliance with strict conditions.
It demonstrated that revocation of parole is an essential tool for maintaining the integrity of the rehabilitation system.
Case 5: District Court of Helsinki, 2020 – Probation and Domestic Violence
Court: Helsinki District Court
Facts:
An offender convicted of domestic violence sought probation after serving part of their sentence.
The offender had participated in anger management therapy and expressed remorse for their actions.
The probation officers suggested that the offender had progressed significantly and could be safely reintegrated into the community under supervision.
Ruling:
The court granted probation with strict conditions, including regular therapy sessions, anger management counseling, and monitoring by the probation service.
The court took into account the offender’s efforts to change and the support available to them.
Significance:
This case demonstrated how probation can be used as a tool for rehabilitation in cases involving domestic violence, where therapy and ongoing supervision are key to preventing re-offending.
It also showed that probation can work even for serious offenses when there is evidence of rehabilitation and a supportive community.
Key Takeaways on Parole and Probation in Finland
Parole Decisions are based on risk assessments, rehabilitation progress, and public safety considerations. Offenders must demonstrate successful reintegration into society before being considered for parole.
Probation is frequently granted to offenders who can demonstrate rehabilitation and reduced risk of re-offending. Conditions include participation in rehabilitation programs, therapy, and regular supervision.
Violations of parole or probation conditions lead to revocation and further penalties, emphasizing the importance of compliance.
Juvenile offenders are given more opportunities for parole and probation, reflecting Finland’s emphasis on youth rehabilitation.
Therapeutic and educational programs are a significant part of the parole and probation system in Finland, supporting the rehabilitation of offenders.
RELATED Blog
comments