Elder Abuse And Neglect Offences
1. Introduction: Elder Abuse and Neglect
Elder abuse refers to acts or omissions that cause harm or distress to older adults, often by family members, caregivers, or institutions. In Finland, elder abuse can be classified as:
Physical abuse – assault, inappropriate restraint, or physical punishment.
Psychological/emotional abuse – verbal harassment, humiliation, intimidation.
Financial abuse – exploitation of assets or fraudulent use of elder resources.
Neglect – failure to provide necessary care, food, medical treatment, or social interaction.
Legal framework in Finland:
Criminal Code (Rikoslaki 39/1889):
Section 21:1 – Assault, battery, or bodily harm.
Section 21:6 – Neglect of duties causing risk or harm.
Section 36:7 – Fraud and abuse of position (relevant for financial exploitation).
Social Welfare Act (710/1982): Obligates municipalities to protect vulnerable adults.
Care Act (980/2012): Regulates standards of care in institutions.
2. Oversight and Reporting
Prosecutors handle criminal cases.
Police investigate allegations of abuse or neglect.
Social services intervene in non-criminal situations.
Victims or relatives can report incidents.
3. Case Law on Elder Abuse and Neglect in Finland
Here are seven cases highlighting legal principles, prosecutorial discretion, and judicial outcomes:
Case 1: KKO 2005:72 – Physical Abuse in a Care Home
Facts:
A nurse in a care home physically assaulted several elderly residents.
Injuries included bruises and minor fractures.
Findings:
Supreme Court convicted the nurse of assault under Section 21:1 of the Criminal Code.
Court emphasized vulnerability of victims and abuse of trust.
Principle:
Elderly persons in institutional care are protected as particularly vulnerable under Finnish criminal law.
Case 2: KKO 2008:45 – Neglect Leading to Death
Facts:
An elderly woman in a nursing home was neglected; medical care and nutrition were inadequate.
The woman died as a consequence of neglect.
Findings:
Supreme Court convicted the responsible caregiver for negligent homicide (Section 21:5).
Highlighted duty of care owed to residents in institutional settings.
Principle:
Severe neglect causing death constitutes a criminal offence, even if unintentional.
Case 3: KKO 2010:58 – Financial Exploitation by a Relative
Facts:
A son used his elderly mother’s bank accounts to fund personal expenses without consent.
Findings:
Supreme Court convicted the son of fraud and abuse of position (Sections 36:7 and 36:2).
Court emphasized that family relationship does not justify exploitation.
Principle:
Financial abuse of elders is punishable, and perpetrators may include relatives or trusted caregivers.
Case 4: KKO 2013:21 – Psychological Abuse in Home Care
Facts:
A home caregiver verbally abused an elderly client, causing severe emotional distress.
Findings:
Convicted under Section 21:1 (assault) and 21:2 (threats).
Court noted psychological abuse is actionable, even without physical harm.
Principle:
Finnish law recognizes emotional harm as a criminal offence for vulnerable populations.
Case 5: KKO 2016:89 – Neglect in Institutional Care
Facts:
Nursing staff repeatedly failed to provide medication and hygiene care.
Several residents developed preventable infections.
Findings:
Supreme Court ruled this constituted neglect of duty and endangerment (Sections 21:6 and 21:5).
Staff received custodial sentences; institution fined for systemic failures.
Principle:
Institutional neglect can lead to both individual and organizational liability.
Case 6: KKO 2018:44 – Elderly Fraud by Care Facility Manager
Facts:
Manager of a private care home embezzled funds from multiple elderly residents.
Findings:
Convicted under Sections 36:7 (fraud) and 36:8 (embezzlement).
Court stressed enhanced penalties for abuse of trust over vulnerable adults.
Principle:
Crimes exploiting elders in institutional settings attract enhanced sentences due to vulnerability and trust breach.
Case 7: KKO 2020:31 – Abuse by Family Caregiver
Facts:
A daughter repeatedly locked her elderly father indoors and deprived him of adequate nutrition.
Findings:
Convicted of assault and neglect.
Court highlighted the responsibility of family caregivers to provide care and protection.
Principle:
Elder abuse is not limited to institutional settings; family members can be criminally liable.
4. Key Legal Principles from Finnish Case Law
Vulnerability enhances protection:
Elderly individuals are considered vulnerable; crimes against them are often penalized more severely.
Neglect can constitute criminal liability:
Failure to provide care, food, hygiene, or medical attention can result in prosecution.
Psychological abuse is actionable:
Threats, verbal harassment, and intimidation are criminally punishable.
Financial exploitation is a serious offence:
Misusing assets of elders by relatives or institutions constitutes fraud/embezzlement.
Institutional responsibility:
Institutions can be held accountable for systemic neglect or abuse.
Family members are not exempt:
Caregivers, even relatives, can face criminal sanctions.
5. Conclusion
Elder abuse and neglect in Finland are taken seriously by courts, with clear case law demonstrating:
Protection of vulnerable adults in both institutional and home settings.
Criminal liability for acts of commission (abuse) and omission (neglect).
Enhanced penalties when trust is abused or harm is severe.
Finnish case law has evolved to recognize physical, psychological, and financial harm equally as offences.
These cases collectively show the Finnish legal system’s comprehensive approach to safeguarding elders.
RELATED Blog
comments