Family Violence Prosecutions In Usa
Overview of Family Violence Prosecutions
Family violence, often referred to as domestic violence, includes physical, emotional, psychological, sexual abuse, or threats by a family member or intimate partner. It is prosecuted under criminal statutes aimed at protecting victims and deterring abusers.
Family violence prosecutions address crimes such as assault, battery, stalking, harassment, violation of protective orders, and sometimes murder or manslaughter.
Legal Framework
State Laws: Most family violence cases are prosecuted under state criminal codes for assault, battery, stalking, and harassment.
Federal Law: The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and 18 U.S.C. § 2261 address interstate domestic violence and stalking.
Protective Orders: Courts issue restraining or protective orders, violations of which are prosecutable.
Mandatory Arrest Policies: Many jurisdictions require law enforcement to arrest the alleged perpetrator if probable cause exists.
Enhanced Penalties: For repeat offenders or use of weapons.
Notable Cases
1. United States v. Castleman (2014)
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Facts: Castleman was convicted of misdemeanor domestic assault in Tennessee and later convicted federally for possession of a firearm. The key issue was whether his misdemeanor domestic assault conviction qualified as a "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" that barred firearm possession under federal law.
Holding: The Supreme Court ruled that even misdemeanor convictions involving offensive touching (not necessarily serious injury) count as domestic violence crimes for federal firearm prohibitions.
Significance: This ruling strengthened federal firearm restrictions for domestic abusers.
2. United States v. Morrison (2000)
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Facts: Christy Brzonkala sued a football player under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) civil remedy provision after being assaulted. The key legal question was whether Congress had the authority to enact the VAWA’s civil remedy under the Commerce Clause.
Holding: The Supreme Court struck down the civil remedy provision as unconstitutional because it exceeded Congress's Commerce Clause powers.
Significance: This case limited federal jurisdiction over domestic violence and emphasized the role of state law.
3. People v. Peterson (California, 2017)
Court: California Court of Appeal
Facts: Peterson was charged with felony domestic violence assault. The issue involved use of prior domestic violence convictions to enhance sentencing under California’s “three strikes” law.
Holding: The court upheld enhancement, ruling that prior misdemeanor domestic violence convictions qualified as strikes.
Significance: Showed how prior family violence convictions can lead to harsher penalties under repeat offender laws.
4. State v. Dunlap (Ohio, 2019)
Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Facts: Dunlap appealed his conviction for domestic violence assault, claiming insufficient evidence that the victim was a family member as defined by statute.
Holding: The court affirmed the conviction, confirming broad statutory definitions include dating partners and former spouses.
Significance: Clarified who qualifies as a protected person under family violence laws.
5. United States v. Singleton (2015)
Court: U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
Facts: Singleton was charged with interstate violation of a protective order after violating a court order forbidding contact with his estranged wife.
Charges: Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2262 (interstate domestic violence).
Outcome: Defendant pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 24 months in federal prison.
Significance: Example of federal enforcement when protective order violations cross state lines.
6. People v. Jones (New York, 2018)
Court: New York Appellate Division
Facts: Jones was convicted of assault and harassment for repeatedly violating a protective order and threatening the victim.
Holding: The court upheld the convictions and the issuance of a permanent order of protection.
Significance: Emphasized the importance of protective orders and consequences for violations in family violence cases.
7. Commonwealth v. Plunkett (Massachusetts, 2016)
Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Facts: Plunkett challenged his conviction for strangulation under domestic violence laws, arguing the statute was unconstitutionally vague.
Holding: The court upheld the statute, emphasizing strangulation’s serious danger in domestic violence.
Significance: Affirmed strict penalties for strangulation as a form of family violence.
Legal Themes in Family Violence Prosecutions
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Protective Orders | Key tool to protect victims; violations carry criminal penalties. |
| Firearm Restrictions | Federal and state laws restrict firearm possession by domestic abusers. |
| Enhanced Penalties | Repeat offenders and assaults with weapons face increased sentences. |
| Interstate Jurisdiction | Federal statutes allow prosecution when domestic violence crosses state lines. |
| Definition of Family Member | Broad definitions include spouses, dating partners, former partners, and relatives. |
Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Year | Jurisdiction | Charges/Issues | Outcome/Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Castleman | 2014 | U.S. Supreme Court | Firearm possession by domestic abuser | Misdemeanor domestic violence bars firearm possession |
| United States v. Morrison | 2000 | U.S. Supreme Court | Federal civil remedy under VAWA | VAWA civil remedy struck down |
| People v. Peterson | 2017 | California Court | Sentencing enhancement for repeat offenses | Prior domestic violence convictions enhance sentence |
| State v. Dunlap | 2019 | Ohio Supreme Court | Definition of “family member” | Broad definition includes dating partners |
| United States v. Singleton | 2015 | Federal District Court | Violation of interstate protective order | Guilty plea, 24 months sentence |
| People v. Jones | 2018 | New York Appellate | Protective order violation and harassment | Conviction upheld, permanent order issued |
| Commonwealth v. Plunkett | 2016 | Massachusetts Supreme | Strangulation in domestic violence | Statute upheld, strict penalties affirmed |
Conclusion
Family violence prosecutions in the USA operate under a combination of federal and state laws aimed at protecting victims, restricting abusers (especially concerning firearms), and ensuring accountability through criminal penalties. Case law demonstrates courts’ efforts to broaden protections, clarify legal definitions, and impose strict sentences on violators.
RELATED Blog
0 comments