Forgery Of Educational Certificates
Forgery of educational certificates refers to the creation, alteration, or use of a fake academic document (mark sheet, degree, diploma, migration certificate, etc.) with the intention to cheat, gain wrongful benefits, or secure employment or admission.
Relevant Legal Provisions (Indian Penal Code, 1860)
Section 463 – Forgery
Making any false document with intent to cause damage, injury, or to support a claim.
Section 464 – Making a False Document
Covers creating, altering, signing, or claiming a document to be genuine when it is not.
Section 465 – Punishment for Forgery
Imprisonment up to 2 years, fine, or both.
Section 468 – Forgery for Purpose of Cheating
Imprisonment up to 7 years + fine.
Section 471 – Using Forged Document as Genuine
Punishment same as for forgery under Section 468/467.
Section 420 – Cheating
Applies if forged certificates are used to secure admission, job, or financial benefit.
IMPORTANT CASE LAWS (DETAILED)
Below are six major case laws dealing with forged educational certificates, each explained thoroughly.
*1. State of Rajasthan v. Ram Prasad (1989)
Key Issue: Use of fake educational certificate for government employment
Facts:
The accused submitted a forged Secondary School Certificate to obtain a government job. Later, during verification, the certificate was found to be fabricated.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that producing a forged certificate to gain employment constitutes offences under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC. The Court emphasized that the intention to cheat is proven the moment the forged document is used to secure a benefit.
Principle:
Using a fake certificate, even if not originally forged by the accused, is sufficient to attract criminal liability.
*2. R. Vishwanatha Pillai v. State of Kerala (2004)
Key Issue: Fake caste certificate used for government job (not educational certificate but same principle of forged documents)
Facts:
The appellant secured a police officer post using a forged caste certificate. Investigation later revealed the certificate to be fake.
Held:
The Supreme Court upheld dismissal from service and criminal prosecution. It held that fraud vitiates everything and that any benefit obtained through forgery is illegal.
Relevance to Educational Certificate Cases:
The Court’s reasoning applies equally:
Any appointment or admission obtained using forged documents is void ab initio.
*3. Delhi Administration v. Manohar Lal (2000)
Key Issue: Forged degree used for promotion
Facts:
An employee submitted a fake B.A. degree from a university he never attended, to obtain departmental promotion.
Held:
The Delhi High Court held that the act constituted forgery for the purpose of cheating (Sec. 468 IPC) and use of forged documents (Sec. 471 IPC).
The Court noted that the intention to cheat is inherent when a candidate knowingly submits a fake educational qualification.
Principle:
Producing forged documents in employment is a serious criminal offence even if the employee has served for many years.
*4. Sushil Kumar v. State of Haryana (2010)
Key Issue: Forged matriculation certificate used to prove age
Facts:
The accused produced a fake matriculation certificate to claim he was within the age limit for a government post.
Held:
The Punjab and Haryana High Court held:
Submitting a fake certificate is an act of cheating.
Even if the job was not ultimately obtained, the offence is complete upon submission.
Principle:
The attempt to cheat using forged educational documents itself constitutes an offence.
*5. State of Karnataka v. Shivashankar (2015)
Key Issue: Fake teacher training certificate
Facts:
A candidate submitted a forged Teacher Training Certificate to gain appointment as a primary school teacher. Verification by the educational authorities proved the certificate to be fake.
Held:
The Karnataka High Court held that teachers hold positions of public trust, and using forged qualifications undermines educational integrity.
Conviction was upheld under Sections 465, 468, and 471 IPC.
Principle:
Forgery in academic matters is treated as a serious breach of public trust, especially for teaching posts.
*6. R. Muthukumar v. Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (2020)
Key Issue: Fake degree from an unrecognized institution
Facts:
The candidate submitted a degree from an unrecognized or non-existent institution to sit for a public service exam.
Held:
The Madras High Court held that knowingly submitting a non-genuine degree amounts to fraud. The Court directed cancellation of candidature and allowed initiating criminal proceedings.
Principle:
A certificate from an unrecognized institution, submitted as genuine, is treated as a forged document.
KEY LEGAL PRINCIPLES DERIVED FROM CASE LAW
Intention to cheat is presumed when a fake educational document is knowingly submitted.
Benefit obtained through forged documents is void, even if the person has been in service for years.
Both creator and user of the forged certificate are liable under IPC.
Employers can terminate employment without departmental inquiry if the document used to secure the job was forged (fraud vitiates all).
Admissions obtained via forged documents can be cancelled at any stage, even after completing the course.
PUNISHMENTS INVOLVED
Section 468 IPC: Up to 7 years + fine
Section 471 IPC: Same penalty as the forgery involved
Section 420 IPC: Up to 7 years + fine
Service consequences: Dismissal, cancellation of admission, blacklisting
RELATED Blog
comments