Functions of the State Pollution Control Boards

Functions of the State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs)

1. Implementation of Pollution Control Laws

SPCBs are responsible for implementing environmental laws and ensuring compliance with regulations related to:

Water pollution

Air pollution

Hazardous waste management

Biomedical waste

Plastic and e-waste

They ensure that industries and local bodies follow prescribed environmental standards.

2. Issuance of Consent

SPCBs grant:

Consent to Establish (CTE)

Consent to Operate (CTO)

...under both the Water Act and the Air Act. No industrial or commercial activity involving pollution can start without these consents.

3. Monitoring and Inspection

SPCBs regularly:

Inspect industries and treatment plants

Collect air and water samples

Monitor emissions and effluents

Ensure proper functioning of pollution control devices

They may initiate actions if industries exceed prescribed limits.

4. Setting Standards

SPCBs set emission and effluent standards for various industries based on:

Nature of industry

Location (sensitive areas, residential zones, etc.)

Type of pollutant

They may prescribe more stringent standards than the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) based on local conditions.

5. Public Awareness and Education

SPCBs conduct awareness programs, workshops, and training for:

General public

Industry representatives

Municipal authorities

They aim to promote responsible environmental behavior.

6. Advisory Role to State Governments

SPCBs advise state governments on:

Environmental planning

Siting of industries

Infrastructure for waste disposal

Pollution control technologies

They assist in formulating state-level environmental policies.

7. Research and Development

SPCBs promote:

Research on pollution control

Development of eco-friendly technologies

Collection and analysis of data on pollution levels

8. Legal Action and Enforcement

SPCBs have the power to:

Issue directions to close or regulate polluting units

Impose penalties and prosecute violators

File cases in courts for serious offences

They play a key role in environmental litigation.

9. Maintenance of Environmental Quality

SPCBs aim to maintain and restore the quality of:

Air

Water

Soil

They undertake measures to prevent and mitigate environmental degradation.

10. Waste Management Oversight

Under rules like the:

Hazardous Waste Rules

Biomedical Waste Management Rules

Plastic Waste Rules

E-Waste Rules

SPCBs regulate collection, transportation, treatment, and disposal of waste.

⚖️ Case Laws Highlighting SPCBs' Functions

🔹 M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1987) SCR (1) 819 (Ganga Pollution Case)

Facts: Tanneries in Kanpur were discharging untreated effluents into the River Ganga.

Held: The Supreme Court directed the SPCB (Uttar Pradesh) to:

Ensure that all polluting tanneries install treatment plants

Close down units that fail to comply

Monitor compliance and report to the court

Significance: Highlighted SPCB’s duty in monitoring industries and ensuring effluent treatment.

🔹 Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, (1996) 3 SCC 212

Facts: A group of industries in Rajasthan was causing groundwater pollution by indiscriminate dumping of waste.

Held: The court criticized the Rajasthan SPCB for inaction and directed it to:

Take remedial measures

Hold industries accountable

Ensure environmental restoration

Significance: Reinforced the SPCB's role in preventing and controlling pollution proactively.

🔹 Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India, (1996) 5 SCC 647

Facts: Tanneries in Tamil Nadu caused water pollution affecting the local population.

Held: The Tamil Nadu SPCB was ordered to:

Assess environmental damage

Close non-complying industries

Monitor sustainable operations

Significance: Established the Precautionary Principle and the Polluter Pays Principle, with SPCBs responsible for enforcing them.

🔹 Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, (2019) 10 SCC 225

Facts: The TNPCB ordered closure of the Sterlite copper plant due to alleged environmental violations.

Held: The Supreme Court found procedural lapses in the TNPCB's closure order, emphasizing that:

SPCBs must follow natural justice

Ensure proper investigation and evidence-based decisions

Significance: Emphasized the procedural responsibility and accountability of SPCBs.

Conclusion

State Pollution Control Boards are key regulatory institutions for safeguarding the environment at the state level. Their effective functioning ensures industrial development happens without compromising environmental integrity. However, their role must be strengthened with adequate:

Manpower

Technical expertise

Autonomy

Resources

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments