ganized Extortion And Racketeering In Transport, Marketplaces, And Urban Areas
The prosecution of organized extortion and racketeering in transport, marketplaces, and urban areas generally involves targeting criminal enterprises engaged in systematic criminal activity with the goal of obtaining illicit benefits or controlling key sectors like transportation networks, commercial marketplaces, or urban districts. This type of criminal activity often involves violence, coercion, and intimidation, and it is prosecuted under various laws such as the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in the United States, and its counterparts in other jurisdictions. Below is a detailed explanation of the prosecution of organized extortion and racketeering, followed by in-depth discussion of several landmark cases.
Key Legal Frameworks
RICO Act (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - U.S. Law:
Under the RICO Act (18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968), prosecutors can target individuals or organizations involved in racketeering activity, including extortion, money laundering, drug trafficking, and organized crime. The law was originally designed to dismantle the Mafia, but it has since been used against various criminal organizations.
RICO is an essential tool for prosecutors because it allows them to charge individuals not just for direct criminal acts but for their participation in an ongoing criminal enterprise. It is particularly useful in cases of organized extortion and racketeering in marketplaces and transport sectors.
Extortion (Under 18 U.S.C. § 1951):
Extortion refers to obtaining property through the wrongful use of force, fear, or threats. It is commonly used in organized criminal activity to force businesses to pay "protection money" in exchange for immunity from violence or destruction of their property. This is a key part of racketeering operations, especially in urban areas and transportation hubs.
Prosecuting extortion often involves gathering evidence of threats, coercion, and the systematic nature of the illegal activity.
Conspiracy Charges (18 U.S.C. § 371):
Many racketeering and extortion cases also involve conspiracy charges, where multiple individuals collaborate to commit illegal acts over time. This is a common feature in organized crime, where members work together to control a segment of the economy, such as the transport or marketplace sectors.
Notable Cases in Organized Extortion and Racketeering
1. United States v. Turkette (1981)
Issue: This case addressed the application of the RICO Act to criminal enterprises engaged in illegal activity across multiple sectors, including extortion and racketeering. In United States v. Turkette, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the RICO statute applies to the enterprise itself, not just the predicate acts of racketeering.
Facts: The case involved the New England Mafia, known as the Turkette Organization, which operated in various illegal activities, including extortion, drug trafficking, and loansharking. The Mafia used violence and threats to coerce businesses into paying for protection, ensuring their continued operation in an otherwise hostile environment.
Court's Ruling: The Court held that the government could prosecute the enterprise involved in a pattern of racketeering, even if the criminal acts were not directly linked to the core business of the enterprise. This broadened the scope of RICO to include not only the individuals directly engaged in criminal conduct but also those who ran criminal organizations as a whole.
2. United States v. Gotti (1992)
Issue: The case involved John Gotti, the notorious head of the Gambino crime family in New York, who was charged under RICO for his role in numerous illegal activities, including extortion, murder, and racketeering.
Facts: The Gambino family controlled several businesses, particularly in New York's construction and transportation sectors. They demanded that businesses pay a "street tax" for the right to operate in the area. Gotti's family also had extensive control over unions, including the Longshoremen’s Union, and used threats of violence to maintain this power. The case was pivotal in showing how organized crime could infiltrate everyday industries, such as transportation and construction, using coercion and extortion.
Court's Ruling: Gotti was convicted based on wiretaps, witness testimonies, and physical evidence that linked him to the pattern of racketeering and extortion. His conviction under RICO was one of the most famous examples of using RICO to dismantle a powerful organized crime family. The case underscored the role of infiltrating unions and other market sectors in organized extortion.
3. United States v. Gambino (2005)
Issue: Another RICO case against the Gambino Crime Family, this time focusing on the infiltration of the transportation industry and illegal union activities.
Facts: This case involved the Gambino family’s efforts to control the New York City trucking industry, where they would force trucking companies to pay protection money in exchange for allowing them to transport goods through the city’s ports. They would also extort money from small businesses operating in this space.
Court's Ruling: The court upheld RICO convictions against members of the Gambino family, finding them guilty of running a criminal enterprise engaged in extortion, loan sharking, and labor racketeering. The decision highlighted the use of physical violence, threats, and intimidation as tools of control in urban marketplaces and the transportation sector.
4. United States v. Sessa (2007)
Issue: The Genovese crime family’s involvement in extorting businesses operating in various sectors, including retail and construction, through threats of violence.
Facts: The Genovese family operated in multiple urban areas, controlling everything from restaurants and construction businesses to small marketplaces. The family would frequently use intimidation tactics to force business owners to either pay for "protection" or allow the family to take a cut of profits from their business dealings. In addition to extortion, members of the family were involved in labor racketeering.
Court's Ruling: The court convicted multiple members of the Genovese family for violating the RICO Act. It also recognized the extent of labor racketeering in which organized crime groups control construction unions, using violence and threats to secure lucrative government contracts. This case demonstrated how extortion could penetrate into various market sectors.
5. United States v. Sica (2009)
Issue: In United States v. Sica, the prosecution dealt with organized crime in the construction industry in New York City, using RICO to address extortion and labor racketeering.
Facts: The case involved the Lucchese Crime Family, one of the Five Families of New York, which engaged in racketeering and extortion by using their influence over unions in the construction sector. They forced companies to hire their own laborers, and threatened violence against workers or businesses that refused. The case also highlighted the involvement of organized crime in managing city contracts, and shakedown operations to control entire industries.
Court's Ruling: The court convicted several high-ranking members of the Lucchese family, utilizing wiretaps, undercover officers, and testimony from former associates. The case was important because it demonstrated how organized crime could not only infiltrate the labor force but could also extend its influence over urban development projects.
Conclusion
The prosecution of organized extortion and racketeering in transport, marketplaces, and urban areas involves a combination of legal tools such as RICO, extortion statutes, and conspiracy laws. The above cases demonstrate the breadth and complexity of these criminal enterprises, from Mafia families controlling construction unions to criminal groups demanding protection money from businesses. These prosecutions serve as a warning of how criminal organizations can infiltrate various sectors of the economy, using violence, threats, and coercion to achieve financial gain and maintain control. Effective prosecution requires careful investigation, including wiretaps, surveillance, and cooperation from former criminals or whistleblowers.
RELATED Blog
comments