Import And Export Violations Under Finnish Criminal Law
Legal Background in Finland
Smuggling / Illegal Import – Criminal Code (Chapter 46, Sections 4–6)
Illegal import of goods without permission, or attempting to import prohibited goods, is punishable by fines or imprisonment up to two years.
Aggravated smuggling applies to large-scale operations, organized crime, or significant value.
Illegal Export / Export Control Violations
Exporting dual-use items or goods under sanction regulations without proper licenses is criminal.
Misrepresentation of end-use or destination is also an offence.
Customs Role
Finnish Customs (Tulli) investigates, seizes, and refers criminal cases to the prosecution.
Offences may involve additional crimes like fraud, falsifying documents, or conspiracy.
Case 1: Illegal Export of Dual-Use Goods by a Finnish Company CEO
Facts:
A Finnish company exported drone-blocking and surveillance equipment to a country under EU sanctions.
The shipment was falsely declared as destined for a neutral country, but internal company records showed the real destination was a restricted country.
Legal Issues:
Violation of export control laws (dual-use goods).
Misrepresentation of destination constitutes falsification and enhances criminal liability.
Outcome:
The CEO was convicted and received a suspended prison sentence of 9 months.
Ordered to pay damages to the state.
Significance:
First high-profile Finnish case targeting dual-use export violations.
Shows that individuals, not just companies, can be held criminally responsible.
Case 2: Student Exporting Dual-Use Goods Without License
Facts:
A 20-year-old student exported laptops, drones, and electronics to a sanctioned country.
The total value of the shipments was significant, and no proper licenses were obtained.
Legal Issues:
Criminal liability for exporting items that could be used for military purposes.
Violation of EU sanctions enforced via Finnish law.
Outcome:
The student received a 14-month suspended prison sentence.
Cooperation with authorities mitigated the sentence.
Significance:
Demonstrates that even individuals acting independently can face severe penalties for export violations.
Case 3: Large-Scale Illegal Electronics Exports
Facts:
A company exported over €2.7 million worth of electronics without permits.
The shipments were intended for countries under EU sanctions.
Legal Issues:
Large-scale export violation.
Potential falsification of documents to evade customs controls.
Outcome:
Investigation ongoing; shows the scale at which export violations occur in Finland.
Significance:
Highlights enforcement challenges with large-scale and organized export violations.
Case 4: Jari Aarnio – Illegal Import of Drugs
Facts:
Former head of Helsinki anti-drug police imported nearly 800 kg of hashish from the Netherlands.
Used his position to cover up criminal activities and threaten witnesses.
Legal Issues:
Smuggling under Chapter 46 of the Criminal Code.
Abuse of office and conspiracy.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 10 years for smuggling, plus additional sentences for misconduct.
Ordered to pay confiscation of over €1.3 million.
Significance:
Example of how import violations can intersect with corruption and organized crime.
Even law enforcement officials are fully accountable under smuggling laws.
Case 5: Organized Crime Motorcycle Club – Drug Smuggling
Facts:
Members of a motorcycle club smuggled hashish, amphetamines, and MDMA into Finland from Central Europe.
Used cross-border networks for distribution.
Legal Issues:
Smuggling of narcotics, organized crime involvement.
Associated crimes like money laundering.
Outcome:
Members sentenced to 5–13 years in prison depending on role and severity.
Significance:
Shows application of smuggling laws to organized crime and large-scale illicit import operations.
Case 6: Finnish Individual Exporting Sensitive Software Without License
Facts:
A Finnish IT professional exported software with potential military applications.
Claimed it was for academic purposes abroad, but the actual end-user was in a sanctioned country.
Legal Issues:
Violation of export control regulations for dual-use software.
Misrepresentation of purpose and end-use constitutes criminal offence.
Outcome:
Convicted and fined, with a short suspended sentence.
Significance:
Demonstrates that export laws cover not just physical goods but software and technology.
Case 7: Smuggling of Tobacco and Alcohol to Evade Excise Duties
Facts:
Individuals imported large quantities of tobacco and alcohol without paying required customs duties.
Attempted to distribute them in Finland illegally.
Legal Issues:
Smuggling under Chapter 46, Section 4.
Violation of excise law.
Outcome:
Convicted and received fines and short prison terms depending on quantity and prior offences.
Significance:
Shows that smuggling laws also apply to controlled goods with excise taxes, not just narcotics or dual-use items.
Summary Observations
Scope of Violations:
Imports: narcotics, alcohol, tobacco.
Exports: dual-use items, software, electronics.
Legal Principles:
Both misrepresentation and absence of permit/license are key elements.
Severity increases with quantity, value, organized crime involvement, or falsification.
Enforcement:
Finnish Customs and law enforcement actively investigate.
Criminal liability applies to individuals and corporations alike.
Trends:
Increasing focus on export control and sanctions violations.
Traditional smuggling (drugs, excise goods) remains a major area of enforcement.
RELATED Blog
comments