Inchoate Crimes Conspiracy Abetment And Solicitation
Inchoate Crimes: Overview
Inchoate crimes are offenses that are committed in preparation for or toward the commission of another crime. They focus on intent and steps taken toward a crime, even if the final crime is not completed. The primary inchoate crimes under criminal law are:
Conspiracy – an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime.
Abetment – intentionally aiding, instigating, or facilitating the commission of a crime.
Solicitation – encouraging, requesting, or commanding another person to commit a crime.
1. Conspiracy
Definition:
Conspiracy involves an agreement between two or more persons to commit an unlawful act, along with an overt act in furtherance of that agreement (in many jurisdictions, an overt act is required to establish liability).
Key Elements:
Agreement between two or more parties
Intention to commit a crime
In some jurisdictions, an overt act toward the crime is required
Case 1 — R v. Shivpuri (1986)
Jurisdiction: India
Facts:
The accused, Shivpuri, agreed to deal with what he believed were prohibited drugs. In reality, the substance was harmless.
He had an agreement and intention to commit a crime (drug trafficking).
Legal Principle:
Under Section 120A of IPC, even an impossible conspiracy is punishable if there is an agreement to commit a crime.
The mens rea (criminal intent) and agreement are enough; actual commission is not necessary.
Holding:
The Supreme Court held Shivpuri guilty of criminal conspiracy, even though the crime was factually impossible.
Significance:
Demonstrates that conspiracy is punishable in itself, independent of whether the planned crime succeeds.
Case 2 — R v. Anderson (1830)
Jurisdiction: UK
Facts:
Anderson and co-conspirators planned to murder someone to obtain money. They made detailed arrangements but were apprehended before attempting the act.
Legal Principle:
The court emphasized that the agreement itself, even without the execution of the act, is sufficient for criminal liability.
Holding:
Anderson was convicted for conspiracy to murder.
Significance:
Establishes that the formation of a criminal agreement constitutes an offense, highlighting the preventive nature of conspiracy laws.
2. Abetment
Definition:
Abetment occurs when a person instigates, aids, or facilitates the commission of a crime. It can be by:
Instigation: Encouraging the crime
Conspiracy: Engaging with others to commit the crime
Aiding: Providing assistance before or during the crime
Key Sections (IPC): Section 107 and Section 108
Case 3 — K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1962)
Jurisdiction: India
Facts:
Nanavati, a naval officer, instigated an associate to confront and ultimately murder his wife’s lover.
Legal Principle:
Instigation constitutes abetment if it encourages the commission of a crime.
Abetment does not require the abettor to physically commit the act.
Holding:
Nanavati was held liable for abetment to murder.
Significance:
Highlights the liability of a person who encourages or directs another to commit a crime.
Physical participation is not required; mental or psychological instigation suffices.
Case 4 — R v. Jogee (UK, 2016)
Facts:
Jogee helped a friend commit murder by encouraging him to attack the victim, but did not physically assault the victim.
Legal Principle:
Clarified the scope of secondary liability: mere foresight of the crime is not sufficient; the abettor must intentionally encourage or assist the principal offender.
Holding:
Jogee was convicted for abetment to murder, establishing the principle that intention to aid or encourage is required.
Significance:
Modern interpretation of abetment/secondary liability in criminal law: mental encouragement must be intentional, not merely foreseeable.
3. Solicitation
Definition:
Solicitation occurs when a person requests, commands, or encourages another to commit a crime, intending that the crime be committed.
Unlike conspiracy, solicitation may not require the solicited person to agree.
Key Elements:
Intent that another person commits a crime
Direct request, command, or encouragement
Case 5 — People v. Rizzo (1927, USA)
Facts:
Rizzo attempted to solicit an accomplice to rob a bank, but the bank robbery never occurred because the accomplice was apprehended before committing the crime.
Legal Principle:
Solicitation does not require the crime to be completed; the intent and request alone constitute the offense.
Holding:
Rizzo was convicted of solicitation to commit robbery.
Significance:
Demonstrates that criminal liability arises even if the solicited person fails to act, emphasizing the preventive aspect of solicitation laws.
Case 6 — State v. Paladino (1978, USA)
Facts:
Paladino solicited others to commit murder for hire. No one actually committed the murder, but the solicitation was clear.
Legal Principle:
Courts hold that solicitation itself is criminal because it represents an attempt to induce criminal behavior.
Holding:
Paladino was convicted of solicitation to commit murder.
Significance:
Reinforces that solicitation is punishable regardless of the success of the crime, focusing on the intent and act of requesting.
Key Distinctions Between Inchoate Crimes
| Feature | Conspiracy | Abetment | Solicitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nature | Agreement between 2+ persons to commit a crime | Instigating, aiding, or facilitating | Requesting, commanding, or encouraging another to commit a crime |
| Requirement of Completion | Not required | Not required | Not required |
| Mental Element | Intent to agree and commit a crime | Intent to encourage or assist | Intent that another person commits the crime |
| Example Case | R v. Shivpuri | K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra | People v. Rizzo |
Summary
Conspiracy criminalizes the agreement to commit a crime. Even if the crime is impossible (Shivpuri) or unattempted (Anderson), liability arises.
Abetment criminalizes encouragement or assistance (Nanavati, Jogee), focusing on intention rather than actual participation.
Solicitation criminalizes the act of requesting or encouraging another to commit a crime, regardless of whether the crime occurs (Rizzo, Paladino).
Inchoate crimes are designed to prevent harm before it occurs, making liability attach at the stage of planning, instigation, or request, not just after the crime is completed.
RELATED Blog
comments