Interim Measures Power Of Arbitral Tribunals In Bahrain

1. Legal Framework in Bahrain

(a) Bahrain Arbitration Law

  • Legislative Decree No. 9 of 2015
  • Based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration

(b) Key Provisions

  • Article 17 → Tribunal’s power to order interim measures
  • Article 9 → Court assistance in interim measures

2. What are Interim Measures?

Definition:

Interim measures are temporary orders issued before the final award to:

Preserve rights, assets, or evidence, and ensure effectiveness of arbitration.

3. Types of Interim Measures

Arbitral tribunals in Bahrain may grant:

(1) Preservation of Assets

  • Freezing assets
  • Preventing dissipation

(2) Preservation of Evidence

  • Securing documents
  • Witness protection

(3) Status Quo Orders

  • Preventing contractual breach

(4) Injunctive Relief

  • Restraining harmful actions

(5) Security for Costs

  • Protecting respondent from frivolous claims

4. Tribunal’s Powers Under Bahraini Law

(A) Broad Authority

Tribunals may order interim measures unless parties agree otherwise

(B) Binding Nature

  • Orders are binding on parties
  • However, enforcement may require court support

5. Conditions for Granting Interim Measures

Although not exhaustively listed in the statute, tribunals generally apply internationally accepted standards:

(1) Prima Facie Case

  • Claim must not be frivolous

(2) Urgency

  • Immediate action required

(3) Irreparable Harm

  • Harm cannot be compensated by damages

(4) Balance of Convenience

  • Weighing harm to both parties

6. Court Assistance in Bahrain

(A) Concurrent Jurisdiction

  • Parties may approach courts before or during arbitration

(B) Role of Courts:

  • Enforce interim measures
  • Issue orders where tribunal lacks coercive power

7. Enforcement of Interim Measures

Unlike final awards:

  • Interim measures may not be directly enforceable
  • Courts may:
    • Recognize and enforce
    • Reissue orders in local form

8. Emergency Arbitrators

Although not explicitly in the statute:

  • Institutional rules (e.g., international arbitration centers) may allow:
    • Emergency arbitrators
  • Bahrain generally recognizes such mechanisms

9. Judicial Approach in Bahrain

Bahraini courts:

  • Support arbitral interim measures
  • Avoid interfering with tribunal discretion
  • Act as supportive authority, not supervisory barrier

10. Key Case Laws (International & Persuasive)

Due to limited Bahraini case law, international jurisprudence is highly influential.

1. Channel Tunnel Group Ltd v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd

Principle:

  • Courts may grant interim relief in support of arbitration

Relevance:

  • Supports court–tribunal cooperation in Bahrain

2. American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd

Principle:

  • Established test for interim injunctions:
    • Serious issue
    • Balance of convenience

Relevance:

  • Influences tribunal standards globally

3. Mobil Cerro Negro Ltd v Petroleos de Venezuela SA

Principle:

  • Courts may enforce interim measures linked to arbitration

Relevance:

  • Supports enforceability of tribunal orders

4. Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd

Principle:

  • Courts may grant interim relief even when arbitration agreement exists

Relevance:

  • Reflects Bahrain’s concurrent jurisdiction model

5. Front Carriers Ltd v Atlantic and Orient Shipping Corp

Principle:

  • Courts assist arbitration by granting asset preservation orders

Relevance:

  • Reinforces supportive judicial role

6. ICC Case No 8786

Principle:

  • Tribunals have inherent power to grant interim relief

Relevance:

  • Supports tribunal authority under Model Law systems

11. Practical Scenarios

Scenario 1:

  • Risk of asset dissipation
    ✔ Tribunal orders asset freeze

Scenario 2:

  • Urgent relief before tribunal formation
    ✔ Party approaches court

Scenario 3:

  • Non-compliance with tribunal order
    ✔ Court enforcement required

12. Limitations of Tribunal Powers

(A) No Direct Coercive Power

  • Cannot enforce orders without court assistance

(B) Territorial Limits

  • Enforcement depends on local courts

13. Drafting Recommendations

To maximize effectiveness:

(1) Include Clause:

  • “Tribunal may grant interim measures”

(2) Provide for Emergency Arbitration

  • Through institutional rules

(3) Allow Court Recourse

  • Explicitly preserve right to approach courts

14. Conclusion

In Bahrain:

  • Arbitral tribunals have broad powers to grant interim measures
  • Courts act as supportive partners
  • System reflects modern international arbitration standards

The Bahraini framework ensures a balance between:

  • Tribunal autonomy
  • Judicial support
  • Effective dispute resolution

LEAVE A COMMENT