International Extradition, The Rule of Non-Enquiry and The Problem Of Sovereignty
International Extradition, The Rule of Non-Enquiry, and The Problem of Sovereignty
1. International Extradition
Extradition is the process by which one country delivers a person accused or convicted of committing a crime in another country, to face trial or punishment there. It is a cooperative legal mechanism between sovereign states.
Purpose:
To ensure that individuals cannot escape justice simply by crossing borders.
How it works:
The requesting country sends a formal request to the country where the accused is located (the requested state). The requested state reviews the request and, if valid, surrenders the person.
Key Elements:
Existence of an extradition treaty or agreement between countries.
The alleged crime must be recognized as an offence in both countries (principle of dual criminality).
The accused’s rights must be protected during the process.
2. The Rule of Non-Enquiry
The Rule of Non-Enquiry is a principle in extradition law where the requested state does not investigate the merits of the case or the guilt or innocence of the accused. Instead, it limits its role to:
Verifying that the extradition request meets formal requirements.
Ensuring that the offence is extraditable under the treaty.
Confirming that procedural conditions like dual criminality are met.
In other words:
The requested state does not question the requesting state's judicial process or the evidence against the accused. This rule helps maintain respect for the judicial sovereignty of the requesting state.
3. The Problem of Sovereignty
Extradition touches directly on the principle of state sovereignty, which means that each country has supreme authority within its territory.
Conflict of Sovereignty:
When one state asks another to surrender a person, it may appear to infringe on the sovereignty of the requested state.
Balancing Act:
States must balance:
Their own sovereignty and control over people within their borders.
The international obligation to cooperate in criminal justice and not provide safe havens for criminals.
Issues:
Political offenses: Many treaties exclude extradition for political crimes to protect political asylum seekers.
Human rights concerns: Requested states may refuse extradition if the accused risks unfair trial or inhumane treatment.
Sovereign discretion: Even if treaty conditions are met, requested states may exercise discretion to refuse extradition based on public policy.
Interrelation Among the Concepts
The rule of non-enquiry respects the sovereignty of the requesting state by not questioning its judicial processes.
At the same time, the requested state exercises its sovereignty by controlling if and when to extradite.
The tension arises because extradition requires one sovereign state to hand over control of a person to another sovereign, potentially limiting individual liberties and state jurisdiction.
Summary Table
| Concept | Explanation |
|---|---|
| International Extradition | Process of surrendering accused/convicted persons between countries |
| Rule of Non-Enquiry | Requested state does not question merits of the case or guilt |
| Problem of Sovereignty | Conflict between states’ territorial authority and obligation to cooperate |
Conclusion
International extradition is a complex interplay of legal cooperation and respect for state sovereignty. The rule of non-enquiry facilitates smooth extradition by limiting the role of the requested state to procedural checks, while the problem of sovereignty requires states to carefully balance their authority with international obligations and human rights considerations.
RELATED Blog
0 comments