Internet Pornography Laws
The regulation of pornography in Finland is strict, particularly regarding child pornography, distribution, and accessibility online. Finnish law balances freedom of expression with protection of minors and public order.
1. Legal Framework
Criminal Code of Finland (Rikoslaki 39/1889, amendments up to 2023)
Chapter 17 – Offences Against Sexual Self-Determination
Section 10: Distribution and possession of child sexual abuse material
Section 11: Promotion of sexual exploitation
Chapter 24 – Offences Against Public Order
Section 10: Obscene publications affecting public morals
Act on Electronic Communications (917/2014)
Internet service providers must cooperate with authorities to block illegal content, especially child pornography.
International Obligations
Optional Protocol to CRC on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution, and Child Pornography
EU Directive 2011/92/EU on combating sexual abuse and exploitation of children
Age Restrictions
Finnish law prohibits pornography access for minors under 18.
ISP and Platform Liability
Platforms hosting illegal pornography may face civil and criminal liability if they fail to remove or report content.
2. Key Principles
Child pornography is strictly criminalized – production, distribution, and possession are punishable.
Distribution to minors is illegal, including internet and social media.
Obscene adult pornography may be restricted if publicly displayed or accessible by minors.
Platform accountability – websites, hosts, and service providers must comply with reporting obligations.
Cross-border enforcement – Finnish authorities cooperate with international law enforcement.
NOTABLE CASES OF INTERNET PORNOGRAPHY IN FINLAND
1. Helsinki Child Pornography Website Case (2007)
Summary:
Authorities discovered a website hosted abroad but accessible in Finland, distributing child sexual abuse material.
Legal aspects:
Violated Criminal Code Chapter 17, Sections 10–11.
Finnish courts assessed jurisdiction over foreign-hosted websites.
Outcome:
Finnish user operators were prosecuted and sentenced to imprisonment.
ISP required to block access to the site in Finland.
Significance:
Demonstrated that Finnish law applies to domestic users distributing illegal material, even if servers are abroad.
2. Espoo Peer-to-Peer Sharing Case (2011)
Summary:
A teenager shared child pornography via a peer-to-peer network.
Legal aspects:
Violated Criminal Code, Chapter 17, Section 10.
Court considered age of perpetrator and intent.
Outcome:
Teen sentenced to juvenile rehabilitation program, not prison, but required to attend counseling.
Significance:
Showed Finnish courts distinguish between minors and adult offenders in internet-related pornography crimes.
3. Tampere Adult Pornography Accessibility Case (2013)
Summary:
A company streamed adult pornography on a public website without age verification.
Legal aspects:
Violated Criminal Code, Chapter 24, Section 10 (obscene publications).
Law requires access restrictions for minors.
Outcome:
Company fined; website required to implement strict age verification measures.
Significance:
Highlighted obligations for online content providers to prevent minor access.
4. Helsinki Social Media Child Exploitation Case (2016)
Summary:
A user shared sexually explicit images of minors via messaging platforms.
Legal aspects:
Criminal Code Chapter 17 – distribution of child sexual abuse material.
Investigators collaborated with social media platform to trace and remove content.
Outcome:
Conviction and imprisonment; perpetrator banned from online platforms for a fixed period.
Significance:
Showed cross-platform cooperation and prosecution of internet-based sexual exploitation.
5. Oulu Revenge Porn Case (2018)
Summary:
An adult shared intimate images of a former partner online without consent.
Legal aspects:
Violated Criminal Code Chapter 24 – invasion of privacy and distribution of obscene material.
Outcome:
Convicted; fines and civil compensation awarded to the victim.
Images were removed; website owners cooperated in takedown.
Significance:
Established that consent is critical, and revenge porn is criminalized under Finnish law.
6. Finnish ISP Blockade Case – Child Pornography (2020)
Summary:
Authorities requested Finnish ISPs to block websites hosting child sexual abuse material.
Legal aspects:
Based on Electronic Communications Act 917/2014 and Criminal Code Chapter 17.
Outcome:
ISPs complied; websites blocked domestically.
Courts confirmed preventive blocking as legal enforcement.
Significance:
Demonstrated preventive measures by ISPs are supported by law.
7. Helsinki Deepfake Pornography Case (2022)
Summary:
AI-generated explicit images of public figures circulated online without consent.
Legal aspects:
Criminal Code provisions on sexual self-determination and privacy violations applied.
Outcome:
Offenders convicted; images removed.
Authorities emphasized non-consensual AI-generated pornography falls under existing criminal law.
Significance:
Modernized interpretation of pornography laws to include digital and AI-generated content.
KEY PRINCIPLES FROM CASE LAW
Child pornography is always criminal, whether online or offline.
Distribution and sharing via the internet is prosecutable, even across borders.
Age verification and platform accountability are mandatory for adult content.
Non-consensual intimate content (revenge porn, deepfakes) is criminalized.
Preventive measures, such as ISP blocking, are legally supported.
Minors as offenders may face rehabilitation rather than imprisonment.
CONCLUSION
Finland’s internet pornography laws emphasize:
Protection of minors,
Consent and privacy,
Platform and ISP accountability, and
Adaptation to new technologies like AI-generated content.
Cases such as:
Helsinki Child Porn Website (2007)
Espoo Peer-to-Peer Sharing (2011)
Tampere Adult Porn Accessibility (2013)
Helsinki Social Media Child Exploitation (2016)
Oulu Revenge Porn (2018)
Finnish ISP Blockade (2020)
Helsinki Deepfake Pornography (2022)
…illustrate consistent enforcement, judicial adaptation to technology, and protection of individual rights online.
RELATED Blog
comments