IPC Section 28

โš–๏ธ Section 28 of the Indian Penal Code โ€“ "Counterfeit"

๐Ÿ“˜ Legal Wording (Simplified):

A person is said to "counterfeit" who causes one thing to resemble another thing, with the intention of practicing deception, or knowing it is likely to deceive.

๐Ÿ” Key Elements of Section 28:

Act of Resemblance:

The person makes one item look like another.

Example: Making fake currency notes that look like real ones.

Intention or Knowledge:

The person must either:

Intend to deceive someone, or

Know that the resemblance is likely to deceive.

The actual success of the deception is not necessary โ€” the intention or likelihood is enough.

Scope:

The definition applies whether or not the counterfeit is complete or perfect.

Even a partially completed counterfeit item is considered "counterfeit" if it meets the above criteria.

๐Ÿ“Œ Illustrations (Examples):

Fake Currency:

A person prints notes that look like โ‚น500 currency notes of the RBI.

Even if the color is slightly off but itโ€™s enough to confuse a person, it's counterfeiting.

Fake Trademark:

A manufacturer copies the logo of a popular shoe brand to sell his own shoes.

He is counterfeiting the brand.

Fake Signature:

Forging someoneโ€™s signature on a cheque or document can also be considered counterfeiting under certain contexts.

โ—Important Notes:

Intent matters: If someone copies something unknowingly and without intent to deceive, it is not considered counterfeiting.

Preparation can be enough: If a person begins making a counterfeit item with the intent to deceive, even if incomplete, it may still fall under this section.

Used in other sections: Section 28 only defines "counterfeit"; actual punishments are specified in other sections (like Section 489A for counterfeit currency).

โœ… Conclusion:

Section 28 IPC defines "counterfeit" as making something resemble another thing with the intent or likelihood to deceive. It plays a key role in punishing crimes like forgery, fake currency, fake products, and misrepresentation. It focuses on deception through imitation โ€” not whether the imitation is perfect, but whether it can deceive.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments