Ipr In Alternative Medicine Innovations.

IPR IN ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE INNOVATIONS

1. Meaning of Alternative Medicine

Alternative or traditional medicine includes:

Ayurveda

Yoga

Unani

Siddha

Traditional Chinese Medicine

Herbal and folk medicine

These systems rely on community knowledge, ancient texts, and natural resources, which creates tension with modern Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) that are based on:

Individual ownership

Novelty

Inventive step

FORMS OF IPR RELEVANT TO ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE

(a) Patents

Patents protect new inventions, but most traditional medicine:

Is already known

Exists in ancient texts

Lacks novelty

Hence, patents are often rejected unless there is:

A new formulation

A new process

A new therapeutic application proven scientifically

(b) Geographical Indications (GI)

Protect medicines linked to a specific region, e.g.:

Arishtams

Herbal formulations tied to geography

(c) Trademarks

Brand names of herbal medicines (e.g., Chyawanprash brands).

(d) Traditional Knowledge Protection

India uses:

Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL)

Defensive protection (preventing wrongful patents)

MAJOR CHALLENGES

Biopiracy

Misappropriation by foreign companies

Lack of documentation earlier

Conflict between public domain knowledge and private monopolies

IMPORTANT CASE LAWS (DETAILED)

1. Turmeric Patent Case

(Council of Scientific and Industrial Research v. US Patent Office)

Facts

A US patent was granted to two researchers for the use of turmeric in wound healing.

Turmeric had been used in Indian households and Ayurveda for centuries.

Issue

Can traditional knowledge be patented as a “new invention”?

Decision

The patent was revoked.

CSIR proved prior art using:

Ancient Sanskrit texts

Traditional practices

Reasoning

The use of turmeric for wound healing lacked novelty.

Knowledge already existed in the public domain.

Significance

Landmark victory against biopiracy.

Triggered creation of TKDL.

Established that traditional medicinal knowledge = prior art.

2. Neem Patent Case

(Neem Foundation v. European Patent Office)

Facts

A European patent was granted for a fungicidal formulation derived from neem seeds.

Neem had been used in India for pest control for generations.

Issue

Whether modifying a traditional process slightly can qualify as an invention.

Decision

Patent was revoked.

Reasoning

The process was not inventive.

Traditional use was well documented.

Mere refinement of known knowledge does not meet patentability standards.

Impact

Strengthened India’s stance on protecting indigenous medicinal plants.

Reinforced that traditional agricultural and medicinal practices cannot be monopolized.

3. Basmati Rice Case

(RiceTec Inc. v. Indian Farmers / Government of India)

Facts

US company RiceTec obtained a patent for certain varieties of “Basmati rice”.

Basmati has centuries-old cultivation history in India.

Issue

Can a company claim exclusive rights over a traditional biological resource?

Decision

Several patent claims were withdrawn or cancelled.

Reasoning

Basmati is a collective heritage of Indian farmers.

The patent attempted to misappropriate traditional agricultural knowledge.

Relevance to Alternative Medicine

Set precedent for biological resources used in herbal medicines.

Emphasized community rights over traditional innovations.

4. Aloe Vera Patent Dispute

(Revocation before patent authorities)

Facts

Patents were sought for medicinal formulations using Aloe Vera.

Aloe Vera is traditionally used in Indian and other traditional medicine systems.

Issue

Whether isolating or processing a known medicinal plant makes it patentable.

Outcome

Patents were rejected or narrowed.

Reasoning

Use of Aloe Vera for skin and digestive ailments was already known.

Lack of inventive step.

Importance

Reinforced that plant-based traditional remedies need genuine innovation for patent protection.

5. Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) Cases

(Not a single case, but multiple oppositions)

Facts

India used TKDL to challenge hundreds of patent applications globally related to:

Yoga postures

Herbal formulations

Ayurvedic medicines

Outcome

Hundreds of patent applications were:

Withdrawn

Rejected

Amended

Legal Principle Established

Digitally documented traditional knowledge can be used as prior art.

Language translation (Sanskrit → English, German, Japanese) was key.

Impact

Major defensive protection mechanism.

Reduced biopiracy drastically.

6. Yoga Asanas Patent Controversy

Facts

Attempts were made internationally to patent specific yoga postures and sequences.

Yoga is an ancient Indian discipline.

Issue

Can physical practices rooted in traditional knowledge be patented?

Position Taken

India opposed such patents using TKDL.

Reasoning

Yoga asanas are:

Traditional knowledge

Part of cultural heritage

Not novel inventions

Significance

Reinforced non-patentability of traditional health practices.

Protected holistic medicine systems from commercialization abuse.

OVERALL IMPACT OF THESE CASES

Strengthened protection of traditional medicine

Established prior art doctrine for indigenous knowledge

Balanced innovation with public interest

Encouraged documentation of traditional medicine

Prevented monopolization of ancient healing systems

CONCLUSION

IPR in alternative medicine requires a delicate balance:

Protect genuine innovation

Prevent biopiracy

Preserve community knowledge

Indian case laws clearly show that:

Traditional medicine is a shared heritage

Innovation must be scientifically novel

Documentation is key to protection

LEAVE A COMMENT