Ipr In Ip Litigation Strategies For Digital Health Inventions.
IP Litigation Strategies for Digital Health Inventions
Digital health inventions (like telemedicine platforms, AI-based diagnostics, wearable health devices, and healthcare apps) often involve complex IP issues because they intersect software, medical devices, and data analytics. Effective litigation strategies must consider:
1. Patent Strategy
Patents are the primary tool for protecting digital health innovations. Litigation often focuses on:
Patent validity: Is the patent truly novel, non-obvious, and adequately described?
Patent infringement: Has a competitor copied the invention, fully or partially?
Claim construction: How broadly or narrowly the patent claims are interpreted.
Strategies in litigation:
Claim mapping: Align product features with patent claims to demonstrate infringement.
Defensive patents: Build a portfolio to countersue if a competitor sues.
Patent pooling or cross-licensing: To avoid prolonged disputes and litigation costs.
Technical expert testimony: Critical in explaining AI algorithms or data analytics in court.
2. Copyright Strategy
Software and algorithms used in digital health inventions can be protected under copyright law. Litigation usually involves:
Code copying claims: Demonstrating that source code or UI elements were copied.
Reverse engineering defense: Arguing independent development.
Strategies:
Maintain detailed version control and development records.
Use licensing agreements to clearly define permitted use.
3. Trade Secret Strategy
Digital health companies often rely on proprietary algorithms, patient data analytics, or AI models.
Litigation strategies:
Show the existence of reasonable measures to maintain secrecy.
Prove misappropriation by former employees or competitors.
Use preliminary injunctions to stop disclosure quickly.
4. Regulatory & Data Protection Considerations
Digital health products often involve patient data, raising HIPAA (US) or GDPR (EU) compliance issues. Litigation may overlap with regulatory compliance, so strategy must integrate both IP and data privacy considerations.
Case Laws in IP Litigation for Digital Health
Below are six illustrative cases showing different aspects of litigation:
1. Intellectual Ventures LLC v. Symantec Corp. (2013) – Software Patents in Health Tech
Facts: Intellectual Ventures sued Symantec for infringing patents related to data security software, which is applicable to health platforms storing patient data.
Key Points:
Court analyzed abstract idea vs. patentable invention.
Focus on software implemented in a specific technical context (here, health data management systems could be analogous).
Lesson: When defending a digital health patent, clearly show that the software invention solves a technical problem, not just a business method.
2. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. (2012) – Patent Eligibility
Facts: Patent on methods for optimizing drug dosage based on metabolite levels.
Holding: Supreme Court ruled that a law of nature (correlation between metabolite levels and optimal dosage) cannot be patented unless it applies an inventive concept.
Lesson: Digital health inventions involving algorithms or biomarkers must demonstrate technical innovation, not just natural correlations or data patterns.
3. Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo Collaborative Services (2016) – Diagnostic Algorithms
Facts: Dispute over patents covering diagnostic methods for neurological disorders.
Key Points:
Courts examined algorithm implementation in medical diagnostics.
Emphasized stepwise application of methods over abstract ideas.
Lesson: For AI-based health diagnostics, claim drafting should focus on specific method steps and integration with medical devices, not just abstract computations.
4. IBM v. Priceline.com – Trade Secrets and Software
Facts: IBM alleged misappropriation of proprietary software algorithms used in data analytics.
Relevance to Health Tech: Digital health platforms rely on proprietary AI and data handling.
Lesson: Demonstrates importance of:
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs)
Clear documentation of trade secret protection
Technical evidence to prove copying
5. Epic Systems Corp. v. Tata Consultancy Services (2020) – Software Copyright
Facts: Epic Systems sued Tata for copying elements of its electronic health record (EHR) software.
Holding: Court emphasized:
Substantial similarity test for code and UI
Proof of copying, not just access
Lesson: UI/UX design and code in digital health apps can be protected under copyright, not just patents.
6. Illumina, Inc. v. BGI Genomics (2020) – Patent Infringement in Biotech Data
Facts: Illumina sued BGI for infringement of patents related to next-generation sequencing (NGS), relevant to digital health genomics platforms.
Key Points:
Detailed technical analysis by experts was critical
Global litigation strategy: US vs. China
Lesson: Digital health inventions often involve international patent disputes; expert technical testimony is critical in proving infringement.
Summary of Litigation Strategies Derived from Cases
| Strategy | Case Illustration | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Patent claim drafting | Mayo v. Prometheus | Focus on inventive concept, not abstract ideas |
| Expert testimony | Illumina v. BGI | Technical evidence is essential for AI/biotech patents |
| Copyright protection | Epic v. Tata | Protect software and UI; show copying |
| Trade secret protection | IBM v. Priceline | NDAs and internal safeguards are crucial |
| Software patent eligibility | Intellectual Ventures v. Symantec | Show technical problem-solving |
In conclusion:
Digital health IP litigation requires a multi-layered approach:
Strong patent portfolio for core innovations.
Copyright protection for software and UI.
Trade secret protection for AI algorithms and patient analytics.
Use technical expert testimony to bridge law and complex technology.
Consider global strategy for international deployment and infringement.
RELATED Blog
comments