Ipr Policy In Fashion Sector.
I. INTRODUCTION: IPR POLICY IN FASHION SECTOR
The fashion industry relies heavily on intellectual property for protecting creativity, brand identity, and commercial value. The key IP rights in fashion include:
Trademarks – brand logos, labels, and trade names
Designs – garment cuts, patterns, textures, and footwear or accessories
Copyrights – prints, graphic designs, textile patterns, sketches
Trade Secrets – manufacturing techniques, fabric compositions, and design methods
Patents – innovative materials, functional clothing technology (e.g., wearable tech)
Policy Goals in Fashion Sector IPR:
Protect creative and industrial designs
Prevent counterfeiting and piracy
Encourage innovation and commercialization
Balance protection with free competition and fast fashion cycles
Regulatory Frameworks:
India: Designs Act, Trademarks Act, Copyright Act, Geographical Indications Act
US: Copyrights, Trademarks, Design Patents, Lanham Act
EU: Community Designs, Trademark Regulation, Copyright Directive
International: Paris Convention, TRIPS Agreement, WIPO treaties
II. KEY IPR POLICIES FOR FASHION
Design Registration
Protects novel, aesthetic aspects of clothing, footwear, accessories
Term in India: 10 years (renewable)
Trademark Protection
Logos, brand names, signature motifs
Protects against counterfeit goods and passing off
Copyright Protection
Prints, textile patterns, sketches, illustrations
Original artistic works automatically protected
Trade Secret Protection
Fabric formulations, dyeing methods, proprietary sewing techniques
Patent Protection
Wearable technology, adaptive clothing, functional design improvements
Anti-Counterfeiting Measures
Enforcement in retail and online markets
Customs enforcement and digital monitoring
Public Awareness Programs
Educate designers and SMEs on IP registration and enforcement
Reduce unintentional copying and infringement
III. LANDMARK CASE LAWS IN FASHION IPR
CASE 1: Hermès International v. Rothschild (MetaBirkins NFTs)
Facts:
Rothschild created digital NFTs replicating Birkin handbags
Sold as virtual items in metaverse galleries
Legal Issues:
Trademark infringement and dilution
Whether digital/virtual fashion is protected under traditional fashion IP laws
Court Reasoning:
NFTs marketed as commercial items → “use in commerce”
Likelihood of confusion with Hermès brand
Brand reputation extended to digital space
Decision:
Trademark infringement and dilution established
Permanent injunction and damages awarded
Significance:
Extends fashion IP protection into digital and virtual markets
CASE 2: Gucci v. Guess (Trademark & Trade Dress Case)
Facts:
Guess allegedly used Gucci’s signature pattern and motifs
Luxury handbag designs copied in commercial products
Legal Issues:
Trademark infringement and passing off
Likelihood of confusion among consumers
Court Reasoning:
Detailed comparison of patterns, logos, and overall impression
Gucci’s distinctive trade dress established
Decision:
Guess found liable for infringement
Injunction and damages imposed
Significance:
Reinforces trade dress and pattern protection in fashion
CASE 3: Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent
Facts:
Louboutin sued YSL over red sole shoes
YSL launched shoes with red soles similar to Louboutin’s
Legal Issues:
Trademark protection for color as a brand identifier
Distinctive trade mark rights
Court Reasoning:
Red sole is recognized as distinctive and associated with Louboutin
Limited scope for fashion color marks
Decision:
Court upheld Louboutin’s rights
YSL restricted from selling red-soled shoes where likely to cause confusion
Significance:
Color can function as a trademark in fashion
Highlights scope of non-traditional marks in apparel
CASE 4: Adidas v. Payless Shoes (Three-Stripe Design)
Facts:
Payless sold shoes with three stripes similar to Adidas
Adidas claimed trademark and design infringement
Court Reasoning:
Stripe pattern recognized as well-known trade mark
Likelihood of confusion for consumers
Decision:
Payless liable for trademark infringement
Injunction and damages awarded
Significance:
Reinforces pattern-based trademark protection in fashion
CASE 5: R. G. Anand v. Deluxe Films (Fashion Illustrations & Copyright)
Facts:
Script and costume sketches allegedly copied in film production
Court analyzed originality and creative expression
Court Reasoning:
Original sketches and designs protected under copyright
Derivative use without permission constitutes infringement
Decision:
Copyright infringement established
Injunction and damages awarded
Significance:
Artistic elements of fashion designs, illustrations, and prints protected under copyright
CASE 6: Louis Vuitton v. My Other Bag (Parody / Trademark Dilution)
Facts:
Louis Vuitton claimed parody bags diluted brand value
Defendant argued parody and free speech
Court Reasoning:
Court examined commercial intent and likelihood of confusion
Parody defense limited when used commercially
Decision:
Partial injunction; commercial exploitation restricted
Brand rights protected against dilution
Significance:
Balances creative expression and brand protection
Critical for fashion designers and marketing
CASE 7: Nike v. StockX (Digital Fashion / NFTs)
Facts:
Unauthorized NFTs using Nike shoes as digital twins sold online
Raises IP issues in digital fashion space
Court Reasoning:
NFTs replicate real products → trademark and copyright infringement
Likelihood of consumer confusion
Decision:
Claims allowed to proceed
Highlights need for licensing digital fashion items
Significance:
Fashion IP protection now includes digital and virtual markets
IV. IPR POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FASHION SECTOR
Strengthen Design Registration
Faster registration procedures for apparel, accessories, and footwear
Protection against knockoffs in domestic and international markets
Trademark & Trade Dress Vigilance
Monitor counterfeit products online and offline
Enforcement of color, pattern, and logo marks
Copyright Education
Protect textile patterns, prints, sketches
Encourage designers to register creative works
Digital & NFT Fashion
Licensing for virtual clothing and digital twins
Extend enforcement to metaverse platforms
Public Awareness Programs
Workshops for fashion SMEs and designers
Anti-counterfeiting awareness campaigns
Platform-Level Enforcement
E-commerce and social media platforms to implement IP compliance
Notices, takedowns, and licensing frameworks
V. CONCLUSION
Fashion sector relies heavily on IP rights to protect creativity and brand identity
Policy focuses on design registration, trademark vigilance, copyright protection, and digital enforcement
Landmark cases like Hermès v. Rothschild, Louboutin v. YSL, and Gucci v. Guess show:
Courts protect brand, trade dress, color marks, and creative prints
Digital fashion and virtual markets are included under IP enforcement
Public awareness, education, and proactive enforcement are critical for sustainable growth and innovation in fashion
RELATED Blog
comments