Judgment Reviews Law at Ethiopia
Ethiopia's judicial system provides structured avenues for reviewing court judgments across civil, criminal, and constitutional matters. Here's an overview of the judgment review processes in Ethiopia:
⚖️ Judicial Hierarchy and Appeal Mechanisms
1. Federal Courts
Federal High Court: Handles major civil and criminal cases at the federal level.
Federal Supreme Court: The highest court in Ethiopia, with cassation authority over federal matters. It reviews final decisions from lower federal courts that contain fundamental legal errors. Decisions by the Cassation Division, comprising at least five judges, are binding on all federal and state courts.
2. State Courts
State Supreme Courts: Have final judicial authority over state law and jurisdiction. They also incorporate a cassation bench to review fundamental errors of state law.
State High Courts: Handle cases at the state level, with decisions appealable to the State Supreme Court.
State First Instance Courts: Address initial cases, with appeals directed to the State High Courts.
🏛️ Constitutional Oversight and Judicial Review
Ethiopia does not have a specialized constitutional courtHowever, the judiciary has the authority to review the constitutionality of laws The House of Federation, with assistance from the Council of Constitutional Inquiry, oversees constitutional interpretation The judiciary can refer cases to this body for constitutional review
📌 Summary
Ethiopia's judicial system offers a structured framework for reviewing court judgments, incorporating multiple levels of appeal and oversight to ensure fairness and legal consistency. While decisions of the Constitutional Council are final, other judicial decisions can be challenged through appeals and cassation, depending on the case type and stag.
RELATED Blog
0 comments