Judicial Discretion In Remand Hearings
Judicial Discretion in Remand Hearings
1. Meaning of Remand
“Remand” refers to the process by which a Magistrate or Judge sends an accused person to judicial custody or police custody after the first production (usually within 24 hours of arrest) or at later stages of investigation.
Sources of Power
Sections 167, 209, and 309 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).
2. Nature of Judicial Discretion in Remand
Judicial discretion in remand means the Judge must decide—based on facts, legal rights, and reasons—whether custody is justified.
This discretion cannot be mechanical, must be recorded, and must respect constitutional rights under Article 21 and Article 22.
3. Key Principles Governing Judicial Discretion
(A) Custody Cannot Be Granted Automatically
Courts cannot grant police or judicial custody simply because the investigating agency requests it.
Case Law
1. Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. (1994) 4 SCC 260
The Supreme Court held:
Arrest and remand must not be routine.
The Magistrate must ask whether arrest and detention were necessary.
(B) Magistrate Must Apply Independent Judicial Mind
The Magistrate cannot act as a rubber stamp for the police; they must scrutinize:
Case diary entries
Reasons for remand
Necessity of custodial interrogation
Case Law
2. C.B.I. v. Anupam J. Kulkarni (1992) 3 SCC 141
Laid down:
Police custody can only be granted during the first 15 days of arrest.
Judicial discretion must be exercised within statutory limits.
(C) Reasons Must Be Recorded for Remand
Courts must record specific reasons when they authorize custody.
Case Law
3. Manubhai Ratilal Patel v. State of Gujarat (2013) 1 SCC 314
SC held:
Remand orders without reasons violate constitutional requirements.
Judicial discretion must be exercised on material placed before the Court.
(D) Remand Is an Exception – Liberty Is the Rule
The Court must consider:
Whether the accused can be released on bail
Whether detention is the least intrusive measure
Case Law
4. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273
The Court directed:
Magistrates must not authorize mechanical remand.
They must check if Section 41 CrPC conditions for arrest are satisfied.
(E) Remand Must Be Based on Investigation Needs
Judicial discretion depends on:
Nature of the offense
Complexity of investigation
Risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses
Case Law
5. State v. Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar (1997) 2 SCC 148
Held:
Purpose of custodial interrogation is specific.
Courts must satisfy themselves that such interrogation is necessary.
(F) Remand Cannot Be Used for Punishment
Custody is not a substitute for punitive measures; the presumption of innocence applies.
Case Law
6. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565
Although a bail case, the Court explained:
Judicial discretion must be compassionate and guided by liberty considerations.
(G) Magistrate Must Consider Illegal Arrest or Procedural Violations
If arrest is illegal, remand cannot cure the illegality.
Case Law
7. Madhu Limaye v. Sub-Divisional Magistrate (1970) 3 SCC 746
Court held:
Judicial discretion must recognize constitutional safeguards and not validate unlawful arrests.
4. Types of Remand and Judicial Discretion
(A) Police Custody Remand (PCR)
Can only be granted within the first 15 days of arrest.
Granted only when:
Interrogation requires physical custody
Evidence cannot be obtained otherwise
Discretion Involves Questions Like:
Is custodial interrogation essential?
Has the police shown specific grounds?
Leading Case
Anupam Kulkarni (supra) – landmark on PCR limits.
(B) Judicial Custody Remand (JCR)
Can be extended beyond 15 days if investigation is not complete.
Discretion Includes:
Whether continued detention is necessary
Whether conditions for bail are satisfied
Case Law
8. Central Bureau of Investigation v. V. Vijay Sai Reddy (2013)
Held:
Remand beyond 15 days is judicial (not police) and must be justified with reasons.
(C) Remand After Filing Chargesheet (Section 309 CrPC)
Once trial begins, remand can still be granted.
Case Law
9. Kiggs v. State of Rajasthan (2003)
Held:
Post-chargesheet remand is not automatic; the Court must consider necessity.
5. Guidelines for Judges in Exercising Remand Discretion
Courts must check:
Legality of arrest
Prima facie material justifying custody
Specific reasons for requiring police/judicial custody
Possibility of bail or less intrusive measures
Medical condition and rights of the accused
Whether remand violates Article 21 (fair procedure)
Case diary and investigation progress
6. Constitutional Framework
Article 21 – Right to life and personal liberty
Article 22(1) – Right to consult and be represented by a lawyer
Article 22(2) – Production before Magistrate within 24 hours
Article 20(3) – Protection against self-incrimination (relevant for police custody)
Courts exercise discretion to balance:
Individual liberty
Needs of investigation
Public interest
7. Summary: What Judicial Discretion Means in Remand Hearings
Judicial discretion in remand hearings is:
✔ Reasoned
✔ Non-mechanical
✔ Bound by statutory limits
✔ Guided by liberty and constitutional rights
✔ Focused on investigative necessity
RELATED Blog
comments