Juvenile Diversion Measures In Afghan Law
✅ I. What Is Juvenile Diversion?
Juvenile Diversion refers to legal measures taken to divert children in conflict with the law away from the formal judicial process and into rehabilitative, community-based, or educational interventions — without a formal trial or conviction.
In Afghan law, juvenile diversion is guided by:
The Juvenile Code of Afghanistan (2018)
The Penal Code of Afghanistan
Constitutional principles and
International instruments (e.g., UN Convention on the Rights of the Child), which Afghanistan has ratified.
✅ II. Legal Basis for Juvenile Diversion in Afghan Law
🔹 1. Juvenile Code (2018) – Key Provisions
Article 9: Best interests of the child must guide all decisions.
Article 18: Diversion may be applied to juveniles charged with offenses not punishable by more than one year of imprisonment.
Article 19: Prosecutors and courts may refer cases for diversion when:
The child admits the offense voluntarily.
There is parental or guardian support.
There is no danger to public safety.
🔹 2. Forms of Diversion Include:
Counseling or mediation
Community service
Apologies or compensation
Enrollment in educational or vocational programs
Supervision by family or social workers
✅ III. Purpose of Diversion
Rehabilitation over punishment
Prevent re-offending
Avoid criminal records
Encourage reintegration into society
Avoid stigmatization from detention or trial
✅ IV. Case-Based Illustrations of Juvenile Diversion in Afghanistan
📌 Case 1: 14-Year-Old Accused of Minor Theft
Facts:
A 14-year-old boy was arrested for stealing fruit worth 100 Afs (less than $2) from a roadside stall in Kabul.
Legal Action:
Under Article 18 of the Juvenile Code, the prosecutor referred the case for diversion due to:
Low severity of offense
The boy’s voluntary confession
Lack of criminal history
Diversion Measure:
The child was ordered to:
Return the stolen item (or pay compensation)
Attend 3 counseling sessions with a juvenile justice coordinator
Remain under the supervision of a parent for 1 month
Outcome:
Case was closed without trial. The child did not reoffend.
📌 Case 2: 15-Year-Old Girl Involved in Family Dispute
Facts:
A girl was charged with “verbal assault” during a domestic argument. No physical harm occurred.
Diversion Decision:
Because the act stemmed from a family conflict and didn’t cause physical damage, the prosecutor facilitated family mediation.
Diversion Process:
Conducted by a trained female mediator
Girl and family signed a behavior agreement
Social worker followed up for 2 months
Outcome:
Charges dropped; focus placed on family reconciliation and social reintegration.
📌 Case 3: 16-Year-Old Accused of Fighting at School
Facts:
Two boys (16 and 17) got into a fight at school. Both sustained minor injuries.
Legal Response:
Instead of prosecution:
Diversion granted due to mutual blame and lack of serious injury
Both boys agreed to community service at school for 2 weeks
Apology letters were exchanged
Outcome:
Case closed after successful compliance; neither boy faced a criminal record.
📌 Case 4: 13-Year-Old Arrested for Vandalism
Facts:
A 13-year-old was caught spraying graffiti on a government building.
Prosecutorial Discretion:
Applied Article 19 of the Juvenile Code for diversion.
Diversion Plan:
The child painted over the graffiti (restorative justice)
Completed 10 hours of community service
Participated in 4 civic education sessions
Outcome:
No criminal prosecution; the child reportedly became active in student government later.
📌 Case 5: 17-Year-Old Accused of Possession of a Knife
Facts:
A 17-year-old was found with a small knife at a school checkpoint. He claimed it was for self-defense.
Diversion Application:
Based on the absence of harmful intent and no prior record
The child agreed to surrender the weapon voluntarily
Diversion Measure:
Mandatory counseling on conflict resolution
Weekly check-ins with a juvenile officer for 1 month
Outcome:
No formal charges. The student resumed classes under parental supervision.
📌 Case 6: 12-Year-Old Accused of Begging
Facts:
A child arrested in Herat for begging on the street.
Authorities’ Assessment:
Determined the child was being exploited by adults
Referred to child protection services, not prosecution
Diversion Process:
Child placed in a government-supported child protection center
Parents located and warned; social reintegration program activated
Outcome:
Diversion succeeded; child later enrolled in a school program.
✅ V. Summary of Diversion Measures by Case
| Case | Offense | Diversion Measure | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Petty theft | Counseling, apology, parental supervision | Case closed, no re-offense |
| 2 | Verbal domestic dispute | Family mediation, behavior agreement | Family reconciliation |
| 3 | School fight | Community service, apologies | No record, boys reconciled |
| 4 | Vandalism | Restorative justice (painting), civic education | Civic participation encouraged |
| 5 | Weapon possession | Counseling, monthly check-ins | Reintegrated into school |
| 6 | Begging | Referred to child protection, enrolled in school | Protected from exploitation |
✅ VI. Challenges in Implementation
Lack of trained juvenile officers in some provinces
Cultural resistance to mediation in some communities
Limited access to social workers or child psychologists
Weak data systems to track diversion effectiveness
Security instability impacting juvenile justice in conflict areas
✅ VII. Conclusion
Juvenile diversion in Afghan law provides a humane, restorative, and practical alternative to formal criminal proceedings for children. The Juvenile Code emphasizes the best interests of the child, rehabilitation, and social reintegration over punishment. The case examples above illustrate the success of such measures in preventing re-offending and fostering better outcomes for children in conflict with the law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments