Juvenile Drug Use Prosecutions In China
I. Legal Framework: Juvenile Drug Use in China
Juveniles in China are considered individuals under 18 years old. Drug offenses involving minors are treated seriously, but the law also emphasizes rehabilitation over punishment.
Relevant Legal Provisions
Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China
Article 347: Illegal possession, trafficking, or use of narcotics is punishable.
Juveniles (under 18) may receive mitigated sentences or be sent to juvenile correctional facilities rather than adult prison, depending on age and circumstances.
Law on the Protection of Minors (2020 Revision)
Focuses on protecting juveniles from criminal exploitation, drug abuse, and rehabilitative measures.
Regulations on Drug Rehabilitation
Juvenile offenders may be sent to compulsory education programs or rehabilitation centers instead of conventional imprisonment.
Repeat offenders or those involved in trafficking face harsher penalties.
II. Case Studies
Case 1: Guangzhou – Teen Meth Use (2015)
Facts
A 16-year-old student was caught using methamphetamine at a party.
Drugs were supplied by an older acquaintance.
Legal Response
Charged with illegal drug use.
Authorities emphasized rehabilitation and counseling, with criminal liability applied cautiously.
Outcome
Minor sentenced to 6 months in a juvenile rehabilitation center.
Required to attend drug counseling and community service.
Supplier prosecuted separately for trafficking.
Significance
Demonstrates the focus on rehabilitation for first-time juvenile users rather than harsh imprisonment.
Case 2: Shenzhen – Synthetic Drugs Among Teenagers (2016)
Facts
Group of teenagers (15–17 years old) were caught using synthetic cannabinoids.
Social media used to acquire drugs.
Legal Response
Authorities investigated online sources and prosecuted both users and traffickers.
Minors received separate handling due to age.
Outcome
Teenagers: 3–12 months in juvenile rehabilitation centers
Adult traffickers: 5–8 years imprisonment and fines
Mandatory psychological counseling provided for the minors
Significance
Highlights the law’s differentiation between juvenile users and adult suppliers.
Shows proactive targeting of online drug networks.
Case 3: Chongqing – Repeat Juvenile Offender (2017)
Facts
A 17-year-old repeatedly used meth and had small amounts in possession.
Previously received warnings from school authorities.
Legal Response
Prosecuted under illegal drug use and possession.
Court considered repeat offenses and potential harm to social order.
Outcome
Sentenced to 1 year in juvenile correctional facility
Ordered to attend mandatory education program on substance abuse
Parents held partially accountable for supervision
Significance
Repeat juvenile drug offenses can lead to longer rehabilitation terms.
Family accountability is emphasized in the Chinese system.
Case 4: Hangzhou – Ecstasy at High School Party (2018)
Facts
Three 16-year-olds caught consuming MDMA at a high school gathering.
Police also found minor quantities for personal use in backpacks.
Legal Response
Minors charged with illegal drug use; case emphasized prevention and education.
Adults who supplied drugs prosecuted for trafficking.
Outcome
Minors: 6–9 months in juvenile rehabilitation centers
Mandatory counseling and probation after release
Traffickers: 4–6 years imprisonment
Significance
Shows courts’ consistency in prioritizing rehabilitation over incarceration for juveniles.
Case 5: Beijing – Teen Cocaine Possession and Trafficking Connection (2019)
Facts
17-year-old discovered possessing small amounts of cocaine.
Investigation revealed connection with organized adult trafficking ring.
Legal Response
Juvenile charged with possession; adult traffickers charged with drug distribution.
Court weighed influence of adult offenders on the minor.
Outcome
Minor: 9 months in juvenile rehabilitation center
Adults: 8–12 years imprisonment and asset seizure
Counseling and education emphasized for the juvenile
Significance
Courts take into account coercion or influence by adults when determining juvenile sentences.
Case 6: Guangzhou – Marijuana Use Among Teenagers (2020)
Facts
Group of high school students (14–17) used marijuana in a dormitory.
First-time offense, small amounts for personal use.
Legal Response
Prosecuted under illegal drug use, but recognized as first-time minor offenders.
Outcome
Sentences: 3–6 months in juvenile rehabilitation centers, community service
Parents required to participate in counseling sessions
Schools monitored students after release
Significance
Shows leniency for first-time offenders; emphasis on family involvement and reintegration.
Case 7: Shanghai – Meth Ring Exposing Teen Users (2021)
Facts
Police dismantled a drug ring supplying meth to minors aged 15–17.
Over a dozen teenagers were identified as users.
Legal Response
Adult suppliers prosecuted for trafficking; juveniles handled separately.
Outcome
Teenagers: 6–12 months in juvenile rehabilitation programs
Adult suppliers: 10–15 years imprisonment
Psychological treatment and educational programs enforced for all minors
Significance
Highlights distinction in Chinese law between criminal adult traffickers and juvenile consumers.
Rehabilitation programs are mandatory alongside criminal penalties.
III. Key Observations Across Cases
Juvenile offenders are treated with a focus on rehabilitation
Sentences are shorter and served in juvenile centers rather than adult prison.
Adult suppliers face harsh criminal liability
Drug trafficking involving juveniles increases penalties for adults.
Repeat offenses lead to longer rehabilitation terms
Juveniles with prior warnings or convictions face stricter supervision and extended correctional time.
Family accountability is emphasized
Parents or guardians are often involved in counseling or required to supervise post-release.
Psychological counseling and education are mandatory
Programs aim to prevent relapse and promote social reintegration.
Type of drug affects sentencing
Methamphetamine, cocaine, and synthetic drugs often lead to stricter rehabilitation measures than marijuana for minors.
RELATED Blog
comments