Medical Marijuana Misuse Prosecutions
1. Legal Framework: Medical Marijuana in Finland
Relevant Law: Finnish Narcotics Act (Laki huumausaineiden käyttörikoksista ja huumausaineiden hallussapidosta, 1961/373, amended several times).
Key Principles:
Cannabis (including medical marijuana) is controlled under the Narcotics Act.
Possession, cultivation, distribution, or use without authorization is criminalized.
Medical prescriptions for marijuana are strictly limited; misuse or over-prescription is prohibited.
Penalties:
Possession or use without prescription: fines or up to 2 years imprisonment.
Distribution or large-scale possession: 1–6 years, depending on severity.
Aggravated narcotics offenses (commercial gain, organized crime): up to 10 years.
2. Principles in Finnish Case Law
Intent and knowledge: Liability requires awareness that possession or distribution is illegal.
Scale of misuse: Small personal amounts often result in fines; large-scale misuse triggers imprisonment.
Medical authorization: Using prescribed marijuana legally avoids criminal liability; exceeding prescription can lead to prosecution.
Commercial gain: Selling medical marijuana without license is treated as aggravated narcotics crime.
Recidivism: Repeat offenders receive harsher sentences.
3. Detailed Case Law Examples
Case 1: Helsinki District Court, 2008
Facts: A patient possessing 20 grams of medical marijuana beyond prescription limits.
Court Reasoning: Court noted that the patient exceeded the legal limit and intended personal use, not distribution.
Outcome: Fine of €3,000.
Significance: Exceeding legal prescription for personal use is punishable, though fines are typical for small amounts.
Case 2: Turku Court of Appeal, 2011
Facts: A person diverted prescribed medical marijuana to friends.
Court Reasoning: Distribution, even to a small circle, violated Narcotics Act. Court considered commercial intent absent but distribution intentional.
Outcome: 1-year imprisonment, partially suspended.
Significance: Sharing medical marijuana without authorization is treated more severely than personal overuse.
Case 3: Oulu District Court, 2013
Facts: A licensed medical practitioner provided excess medical marijuana to multiple patients without proper documentation.
Court Reasoning: Court emphasized professional misconduct, intentional violation of prescription regulations, and risk of diversion.
Outcome: 3 years imprisonment; practitioner lost medical license.
Significance: Professionals face severe consequences for facilitating misuse.
Case 4: Helsinki Court of Appeal, 2016
Facts: A patient was caught cultivating cannabis at home, claiming it was for medical use but without a valid prescription.
Court Reasoning: Cultivation without authorization is aggravated misuse. Personal use defense rejected due to lack of prescription.
Outcome: 2.5 years imprisonment.
Significance: Home cultivation without legal authorization is considered serious.
Case 5: Tampere District Court, 2018
Facts: A group sold medical marijuana imported from abroad without Finnish license.
Court Reasoning: Distribution across multiple recipients and cross-border import made this aggravated narcotics offense.
Outcome: Sentences ranged 3–5 years imprisonment.
Significance: Commercial or organized misuse is treated very harshly.
Case 6: Turku District Court, 2020
Facts: A patient repeatedly exceeded prescription and sold small portions to acquaintances.
Court Reasoning: Combination of personal misuse and minor distribution elevated offense. Court considered recidivism.
Outcome: 2 years imprisonment, partially suspended.
Significance: Repeated misuse and minor distribution increases penalties.
4. Observations from Finnish Case Law
Personal misuse (small amounts) typically leads to fines or short suspended sentences.
Distribution or sharing is considered more serious, even without profit motive.
Medical practitioners violating prescription rules face heavy sentences and professional sanctions.
Home cultivation without prescription is treated as aggravated misuse.
Organized or repeated misuse triggers the harshest penalties.
5. Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Year | Facts | Offense | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helsinki DC | 2008 | Personal use exceeding prescription | Possession | Fine €3,000 | Small-scale personal overuse |
| Turku CA | 2011 | Shared prescribed marijuana with friends | Unauthorized distribution | 1 yr, partially suspended | Sharing punished |
| Oulu DC | 2013 | Doctor gave excess to multiple patients | Professional misconduct | 3 yrs + license revoked | Professionals held accountable |
| Helsinki CA | 2016 | Home cultivation without prescription | Aggravated misuse | 2.5 yrs | Cultivation punished |
| Tampere DC | 2018 | Group selling imported marijuana | Aggravated narcotics | 3–5 yrs | Organized distribution severe |
| Turku DC | 2020 | Repeated personal misuse and minor distribution | Recidivist misuse | 2 yrs, partially suspended | Repeat offenders punished |
RELATED Blog
comments