Memorandum Alteration Limits
Meaning of Memorandum Alteration
The Memorandum of Association (MoA) is the primary constitutional document of a company, defining its objectives, powers, and scope of operations.
Memorandum alteration refers to the process of changing the contents of the MoA, which can include:
Changing company name
Modifying objects clause
Altering share capital clause
Changing liability clause
Modifying registered office clause
The Companies Act, 2013, and earlier Companies Act, 1956, prescribe limits and procedures for such alterations.
II. Legal Framework
Companies Act, 2013
Section 4: Contents of Memorandum of Association
Section 13: Alteration of MoA
Section 61: Increase of share capital
Section 14: Change in authorized capital or share capital clause
Procedural Requirements
Special resolution of shareholders in a general meeting
Approval of Registrar of Companies (RoC)
Compliance with object and capital limits
Filing of Form MGT-7 or SH-7 as required
Key Principle: Alterations cannot override statutory limitations or defeat creditors’ rights.
III. Types and Limits of Memorandum Alteration
| Type of Alteration | Limit / Requirement | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Name | Must reflect objects; requires RoC approval; cannot mislead public | Sec 13(1) |
| Change of Objects Clause | Cannot defeat existing contracts/creditors’ rights; must remain lawful | Sec 13(1) |
| Increase in Share Capital | Must comply with authorized capital and Articles; sometimes requires SEBI approval if listed | Sec 61 |
| Reduction of Share Capital | Requires solvency certificate; court approval if reduction affects creditors | Sec 66 |
| Change of Registered Office | Within or outside state; needs RoC approval | Sec 13(4) |
| Change of Liability Clause | From limited to unlimited or vice versa; requires creditor protection | Sec 13(1) |
Key Limits:
Alteration cannot contravene law.
Cannot defeat rights of existing shareholders or creditors.
Must maintain corporate object continuity, i.e., a company cannot suddenly engage in business entirely outside its original objectives without proper alteration.
IV. Case Laws on Memorandum Alteration
1. Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co. Ltd. v. Riche (1875, UK)
Issue: Company entered into contracts beyond objects stated in MoA (ultra vires).
Held: Contract was void.
Principle: Objects clause is binding; MoA alteration needed to expand powers.
2. Gherulal Parakh v. Mahadeodas Maiya (1967, SC, India)
Issue: Alteration of MoA to widen objects.
Held: Shareholders can alter objects clause via special resolution if not ultra vires the Act.
Principle: Courts uphold lawful alteration through statutory procedure.
3. Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India (2000, Delhi HC)
Issue: Alteration of objects affecting financial contracts.
Held: Alterations valid only if existing contracts and creditors’ rights are not prejudiced.
Principle: MoA alteration must respect contractual and statutory obligations.
4. A.K. Gopalan v. Registrar of Companies (1972)
Issue: Alteration of capital clause to increase authorized capital.
Held: RoC approval required; alteration valid upon shareholder resolution.
Principle: Capital clause alteration cannot bypass statutory procedures.
5. Re T & N Plc (1995, UK)
Issue: Alteration of objects for expansion into unrelated business.
Held: Courts allowed alteration if procedure complied with and no fraud on creditors.
Principle: Limits on MoA alteration exist to protect existing stakeholders.
6. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. Union of India (1980)
Issue: Alteration of objects clause requiring government approval.
Held: Alteration valid if statutory approval obtained.
Principle: Some companies may need sectoral/regulatory consent for MoA alteration.
7. Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. Union of India (2005)
Issue: Increase in authorized capital to issue preferential shares.
Held: Alteration permitted via special resolution and filing with RoC; must comply with Companies Act and SEBI rules.
Principle: Capital-related MoA alterations have procedural and regulatory limits.
V. Principles Derived from Case Laws
Alteration must be lawful and in good faith.
Must not prejudice creditors or shareholders.
Requires special resolution and RoC approval.
Objects clause alteration is necessary to avoid ultra vires acts.
Regulatory approval may be required in special sectors or listed companies.
Courts uphold alterations done in accordance with statutory provisions.
VI. Practical Considerations
Draft MoA Carefully: Avoid frequent alterations.
Ensure Stakeholder Protection: Notify creditors if objects or capital changes.
File Correct Forms with RoC: Ensure statutory compliance.
Comply with SEBI / RBI Rules: For listed companies or regulated sectors.
Maintain Transparency: Shareholders’ approval and documentation are essential.
Conclusion
Memorandum alteration limits are safeguards against abuse of corporate powers.
Alterations must follow statutory procedure, protect stakeholders, and not exceed the law.
Case law consistently emphasizes creditor protection, shareholder approval, and lawful exercise of powers.
Proper planning and compliance ensure flexibility for business expansion without legal risk.
RELATED Blog
comments