Money Laundering Laws And Case Precedents
✅ Money Laundering Laws in Finland
1. Legal Framework for Money Laundering in Finland
Money laundering is criminalized in Finland primarily under Chapter 32 of the Finnish Criminal Code (Rikoslaki), which specifically deals with offenses related to money laundering and associated crimes.
Key Provisions:
Money Laundering Offense:
Under Section 32:6 of the Criminal Code, money laundering is defined as the intentional concealment, transformation, or transfer of property obtained through criminal activity. This involves concealing the illicit origin of funds by making them appear legal or legitimate.
Punishment:
A person convicted of money laundering can face up to four years of imprisonment. If the laundering involves larger sums or organized crime, the penalties can be even more severe.
Participation in Money Laundering:
Even if someone is not the direct perpetrator of the criminal activity generating the illicit funds, they can be prosecuted if they assist or facilitate the laundering process, including helping to hide, transfer, or disguise the origin of criminal funds.
The Finnish Act on Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Laki rahanpesun ja terrorismin rahoittamisen estämisestä, 444/2017) provides additional guidance on preventive measures and due diligence for financial institutions and other reporting entities.
2. Key Elements of Money Laundering
To establish a charge of money laundering, several key elements must be proven:
Illicit Origin of Funds: The funds involved must have been obtained through criminal activity, such as fraud, corruption, or drug trafficking.
Acts of Concealment or Transformation: The person accused of money laundering must have engaged in actions to conceal, disguise, or transform the illicit origin of the funds.
Knowledge or Willful Blindness: The perpetrator must know or be willfully blind to the illicit origin of the funds or property they are handling.
📚 Case Law Examples (Detailed Analysis)
Here are several case law examples that demonstrate how money laundering laws are applied in Finland.
Case 1 — KKO 2009:74 — Money Laundering Through Real Estate Transactions
Facts
A Finnish businessman, involved in a series of fraudulent schemes, laundered his illicit gains through the purchase of high-value real estate.
He purchased properties under false names and sold them at inflated prices, transferring the profits to offshore accounts in an attempt to obscure the illicit nature of the funds.
Issue
Whether the actions of concealing the origin of funds through real estate transactions constituted money laundering under Finnish law.
Holding
The Supreme Court ruled that the sale and purchase of property under false pretenses with the intent to disguise the origin of funds constituted money laundering.
The defendant was sentenced to four years in prison for money laundering.
Significance
The case set a significant precedent for money laundering through real estate and highlighted that property transactions are frequently used in money laundering schemes.
It reinforced that intentional concealment of criminal funds, even through complex transactions, qualifies as money laundering.
Case 2 — KKO 2012:32 — Bank's Involvement in Money Laundering
Facts
A bank in Finland was found to have processed large amounts of money for clients whose accounts were linked to illegal activities such as drug trafficking.
The bank did not perform adequate due diligence on the origins of the funds and failed to report suspicious transactions to the authorities.
Issue
Whether the failure of the financial institution to report suspicious transactions and verify the origin of funds constituted money laundering under Finnish law.
Holding
The Supreme Court ruled that the failure to report suspicious transactions amounted to assisting in the laundering of criminal proceeds, even if the bank did not directly handle the illicit funds.
The bank was fined heavily, and several employees were convicted for failing to comply with anti-money laundering regulations.
Significance
This case demonstrated that financial institutions and their employees can be held criminally liable for facilitating money laundering if they fail to meet their due diligence obligations.
It emphasized the importance of reporting obligations for institutions under the Finnish anti-money laundering regime.
Case 3 — KKO 2014:45 — Online Gambling and Money Laundering
Facts
A criminal organization used online gambling platforms to launder illicit proceeds obtained from drug trafficking.
The organization transferred funds to offshore accounts through various gambling transactions, making the funds appear as legitimate gambling winnings.
Issue
Whether the act of using online gambling platforms for the purpose of money laundering could constitute a violation of Finnish money laundering laws.
Holding
The Supreme Court ruled that the organization’s use of online gambling to facilitate money laundering was a clear violation of Finnish money laundering laws.
The accused individuals were found guilty of money laundering and sentenced to prison terms.
Significance
This case showed the evolving nature of money laundering, with the use of online platforms such as gambling sites to launder illicit funds.
It reinforced that money laundering techniques are constantly adapting and that the legal framework must be broad enough to address new methods of laundering money.
Case 4 — KKO 2016:61 — Corruption and Money Laundering in Public Procurement
Facts
A public official in Finland was involved in a bribery scheme related to public procurement contracts.
The bribes were laundered through shell companies, which then transferred funds to various foreign bank accounts to hide the illegal nature of the money.
Issue
Whether the use of shell companies to disguise the origin of illicit funds from bribery and corruption could be prosecuted as money laundering under Finnish law.
Holding
The Court held that the defendant's use of shell companies and complex financial transactions to disguise the origin of corruption proceeds constituted money laundering.
The official was sentenced to several years in prison for both bribery and money laundering.
Significance
The case underscores how money laundering often involves the use of complex structures, such as shell companies, to hide the origins of illicit funds.
It emphasized that public officials involved in corruption schemes can be prosecuted for both corruption and money laundering.
Case 5 — KKO 2018:23 — International Money Laundering and Real Estate Development
Facts
A real estate developer with ties to organized crime was accused of laundering illicit funds through real estate projects.
The defendant used international property deals to transfer money across borders, creating an appearance of legitimate investment.
Issue
Whether the use of real estate development to launder money obtained from organized crime constituted money laundering under Finnish law.
Holding
The Court convicted the defendant of money laundering, stating that the real estate transactions were used to disguise the illicit origin of the funds.
The defendant was sentenced to 5 years in prison.
Significance
This case reinforced the notion that real estate transactions are a common method of money laundering, especially in cases involving organized crime.
Case 6 — KKO 2021:15 — Virtual Currencies and Money Laundering
Facts
A criminal network used virtual currencies (such as Bitcoin) to launder criminal proceeds obtained from cybercrime.
The network bought large amounts of cryptocurrency and then converted it into fiat currencies, disguising the origin of the funds.
Issue
Whether cryptocurrency transactions could be considered a form of money laundering under Finnish law, especially when they are used to conceal illicit financial activity.
Holding
The Court ruled that the use of virtual currencies for money laundering is illegal under Finnish law and that cryptocurrency can be used in the same way as traditional currencies for laundering purposes.
The individuals involved were sentenced to prison and significant fines.
Significance
This case highlights the growing concern over digital currencies and their potential to facilitate money laundering in the modern financial system.
✅ Key Takeaways from Case Law
| Case | Issue | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| KKO 2009:74 | Money laundering through real estate transactions | Conviction for money laundering | Real estate transactions used in money laundering. |
| KKO 2012:32 | Bank’s failure to report suspicious transactions | Bank fined, employees convicted | Financial institutions’ liability in money laundering. |
| KKO 2014:45 | Money laundering via online gambling platforms | Conviction for money laundering | Evolving money laundering methods using online platforms. |
RELATED Blog
comments