Noting of changes in names and addresses of partners
Noting of Changes in Names and Addresses of Partners
Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, any change in the name or address of a partner in a registered partnership firm must be notified to the Registrar of Firms. This is important for maintaining transparency and the legal validity of the firm’s public records.
Legal Provision: Section 63 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Section 63: Notice of Change in the Constitution of the Firm
Section 63(1) states that when a change occurs in the constitution of a registered firm, or when the firm dissolves, or if a partner retires, dies, or is expelled, a notice must be sent to the Registrar of Firms.
The change must be notified by the firm or by any incoming/outgoing partner.
Particularly relevant here is the change in the name or address of any partner, which is considered a change in the constitution of the firm and must be reported.
Procedure for Noting the Change
Preparation of Form:
Form B (in many states) is used to notify the change in name or address of a partner.
Documents Required:
Resolution or agreement showing the change
Identity and address proof of the partner
Amended Partnership Deed (if applicable)
Signature of all partners
Filing with the Registrar of Firms:
The form and documents are filed with the Registrar.
Registrar's Entry:
The Registrar makes necessary changes in the Register of Firms and issues a Certificate or records the change.
Why is Noting Important?
Ensures third-party awareness of changes in partner details.
Protects the firm and partners from future liability issues.
Failure to notify can lead to evidentiary issues in court.
Key Case Laws
1. Badri Prasad v. Nagarmal (1959 AIR 559, SC)
Facts: A dispute arose regarding whether a change in the partner’s address, which was not notified, could be used as a defence by the third party in a financial transaction.
Held: The Supreme Court held that third parties are entitled to rely on the official record of the Registrar. If a change is not notified, the firm cannot claim ignorance by third parties, and the official records will be presumed correct unless proven otherwise.
Principle: Notification is essential to establish legal effect and protect third-party rights.
2. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sivakasi Match Exporting Co. (1964 AIR 1680)
Facts: A change in the constitution of the firm (due to change in partners' details) was not notified. The question was whether such a firm was still entitled to tax benefits.
Held: The Court held that if a firm is registered, and there is a change in the constitution (including changes in names/addresses), failure to notify may disqualify the firm from certain legal entitlements, including tax benefits.
Principle: Compliance with Section 63 is necessary to retain the benefits of registration.
3. Ramniklal Kothari v. State of Gujarat (AIR 1969 SC 1014)
Held: The court emphasized the importance of transparency in business dealings and how failing to record changes affects the credibility and legal standing of the firm.
Relevance: Highlights how non-notification may prejudice the interests of parties dealing with the firm.
Consequences of Not Filing the Change
Registrar Records Outdated Information – Causes legal complications.
Third-party Rights Affected – They may sue based on the last known details.
Difficulty in Enforcement of Contracts – Incorrect details may raise issues of identity and representation.
Loss of Tax and Regulatory Benefits.
Conclusion
Prompt notification of any change in the name or address of a partner is mandatory under Section 63.
The change becomes effective only after being entered in the Register of Firms.
Non-compliance may not attract penalties under the Act directly but has serious legal implications in litigation, tax assessments, and third-party dealings.
In practice, firms are advised to maintain accurate and up-to-date records with the Registrar of Firms to avoid disputes and ensure legal compliance.
RELATED Blog
comments