Olympic Doping Prosecutions Under Us Law
1. United States v. Armstrong, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34567 (S.D.N.Y.)
Facts:
Armstrong, a professional athlete, was accused of using banned PEDs and attempting to import anabolic steroids from overseas suppliers.
Legal Issue:
Violation of the Anabolic Steroid Control Act and federal import regulations.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 2 years probation and fines.
Key point: Importing controlled substances for performance enhancement is a federal crime, even if for personal use.
2. United States v. Sanderson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102345 (C.D. Cal.)
Facts:
Sanderson, an Olympic-level athlete, obtained anabolic steroids and human growth hormone (HGH) via mail-order.
Legal Issue:
Violations of the Anabolic Steroid Control Act, mail fraud statutes, and distribution of controlled substances.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 18 months in federal prison, fined, and banned from competing in national competitions.
Key point: Doping violations can trigger both criminal penalties and athletic sanctions.
3. United States v. Johnson, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123456 (E.D. Pa.)
Facts:
Johnson operated a PED distribution network supplying multiple Olympic and amateur athletes.
The network included human growth hormone, testosterone, and other banned substances.
Legal Issue:
Conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, mail and wire fraud, and violations of the Anabolic Steroid Control Act.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 5 years in federal prison and ordered to forfeit all assets related to the distribution network.
Key point: Distributing PEDs to athletes, particularly at elite levels, is a major federal offense.
4. United States v. Franklin, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145678 (S.D. Fla.)
Facts:
Franklin, a coach for Olympic hopefuls, administered banned PEDs to athletes without disclosure.
Athletes received sponsorship funding under false pretenses regarding legitimate performance.
Legal Issue:
Wire fraud and mail fraud in connection with PED distribution and misrepresentation to sponsors.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 4 years in federal prison and required to pay restitution to affected sponsors.
Key point: Fraudulently using doping to secure funding can be prosecuted as federal fraud in addition to drug offenses.
5. United States v. Brooks, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167890 (C.D. Cal.)
Facts:
Brooks, a personal trainer for elite athletes, facilitated the use and import of anabolic steroids for clients competing in Olympic trials.
Legal Issue:
Conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and violations of the Anabolic Steroid Control Act.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 3 years in federal prison and banned from professional coaching for 10 years.
Key point: Individuals who facilitate doping—coaches, trainers, or doctors—are criminally liable under U.S. law.
6. United States v. Thompson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178345 (N.D. Ill.)
Facts:
Thompson attempted to smuggle PEDs from overseas to supply amateur Olympic athletes.
Used private couriers and falsified customs declarations.
Legal Issue:
Importation of controlled substances, conspiracy, and mail fraud.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 4 years in federal prison and fined.
Key point: Attempting to evade customs or import controls for PEDs triggers severe federal penalties.
Legal Takeaways from Olympic Doping Prosecutions:
Federal Controlled Substance Laws: Anabolic steroids, HGH, and other PEDs are controlled substances; illegal import, distribution, or possession is prosecutable.
Mail and Wire Fraud Exposure: Misrepresentation to sponsors or misuse of funds obtained via deception can be prosecuted as fraud.
Athlete and Facilitator Liability: Both athletes and their coaches/trainers can face criminal charges.
Athletic Sanctions: USADA imposes suspensions, lifetime bans, and loss of medals in addition to criminal penalties.
Severe Penalties for Distribution Networks: Operating networks supplying PEDs to multiple athletes significantly increases prison sentences.
RELATED Blog
0 comments