Overview of Consequential (Special) Damages
Overview of Consequential (Special) Damages
Consequential damages, also known as special damages, refer to the damages that are not the direct result of an act, but are instead caused by the special circumstances of the injured party. Unlike general damages which are directly tied to the harm caused by the defendant’s actions (e.g., pain, suffering, or loss of property), consequential damages cover losses that are an indirect result of the breach or wrongful act but were foreseeable to the parties at the time of the contract or incident.
These damages are awarded in a civil case to compensate the plaintiff for losses that go beyond the immediate effects of the defendant’s actions.
Key Features of Consequential (Special) Damages
Indirect Consequences:
Consequential damages do not arise directly from the breach or wrongful act but are a secondary result of that act.
For example, if a defective product causes a business to close temporarily, the resulting loss of profits would be considered consequential damage.
Foreseeability:
These damages must be foreseeable at the time the contract is formed or when the tortious act occurs. Under the "rule of foreseeability", a defendant is liable for damages that are reasonably predictable to result from the defendant's actions or breach.
If the defendant could reasonably foresee the loss arising from their actions, they may be held responsible for it.
Purpose:
The goal of awarding consequential damages is to make the injured party whole by compensating them for additional losses that flow from the defendant’s actions.
These damages seek to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in if the wrongful act or breach had not occurred, including indirect or secondary financial losses.
Proof of Damages:
The plaintiff must prove both that the damages are a direct consequence of the defendant's actions and that the losses are specific and measurable.
Courts require evidence to establish a causal link between the defendant's conduct and the consequential losses. If the losses are too speculative or remote, the plaintiff may not be entitled to these damages.
Examples of Consequential (Special) Damages
Contract Breach:
A supplier fails to deliver goods on time to a business. The business cannot fulfill its orders, leading to lost profits from its customers. The lost profits would be considered consequential damages because they arise indirectly from the breach.
Property Damage:
If a property is damaged due to a faulty product or negligent construction, consequential damages could include costs incurred to repair the property, loss of income from rental property, or business disruptions as a result of the damage.
Loss of Business Opportunity:
A party to a contract fails to deliver services or products as agreed. The affected business loses out on an opportunity to enter into a lucrative deal with a third party. The lost opportunity and the expected profits from the opportunity may be claimed as consequential damages.
Personal Injury:
In a personal injury case, if a person’s injury leads to an inability to work, the loss of future income (or the additional cost incurred for rehabilitation) would be consequential damages.
Defective Products:
If a defective product causes an injury or damage, any secondary damages caused by the product—like repair costs, downtime, or loss of customer goodwill—could be considered consequential damages.
Distinction Between Consequential Damages and Other Types of Damages
General Damages:
These damages are the direct result of the defendant’s action (e.g., pain and suffering, physical injury).
Consequential damages are a subset of special damages that go beyond the direct loss and compensate for further economic losses caused by the defendant’s act.
Punitive Damages:
These are not compensatory in nature. Instead of compensating the plaintiff, punitive damages are meant to punish the defendant for particularly egregious conduct.
Consequential damages are compensatory, designed to reimburse the plaintiff for specific losses.
Legal Considerations and Requirements for Claiming Consequential Damages
Notice of the Special Circumstances:
The plaintiff must typically prove that the defendant was aware (or should have been aware) of the special circumstances that would lead to the consequential damages.
In a contract scenario, the plaintiff might need to show that the defendant knew the plaintiff was relying on specific performance, which would result in further losses if breached.
Reasonable Certainty:
Consequential damages must be proven with a certain degree of reasonable certainty. The plaintiff should provide concrete evidence of the losses and how they stemmed directly from the defendant’s breach or wrongful conduct.
Causation:
There must be a clear causal link between the defendant’s actions and the consequential damages. This requires detailed evidence, such as financial records, expert testimony, or documentation to support the claim of lost profits or other indirect losses.
Contract Law and Consequential Damages
In the context of contract law, consequential damages are usually considered a form of indirect loss that arise from a breach of contract. However, these damages may be limited or excluded in some contracts. Parties often use limitation of liability clauses to avoid being held liable for consequential damages, especially in high-risk industries.
Example: In many contracts, a clause may state that a party is not liable for consequential damages, such as lost profits or business opportunities, resulting from a breach. However, such clauses must be clear and unambiguous to be enforceable.
Examples of Case Law Involving Consequential (Special) Damages
Hadley v. Baxendale (1854):
This landmark English case is foundational in contract law and helped establish the rule of foreseeability. The court ruled that a party may only be liable for consequential damages if those damages were foreseeable at the time the contract was formed. In this case, the claimant sought consequential damages for lost profits due to a delayed delivery of a broken mill shaft. The court held that the damages were not foreseeable, as the defendant had not been informed of the special circumstances.
The Seagate Technology Case (2008):
In this case, Seagate was found liable for consequential damages after a data backup service failed, leading to a major loss for the plaintiff. The damages were determined to be a direct result of the failure to provide the agreed service and thus qualified as consequential.
Conclusion
Consequential (special) damages are an important aspect of both contract and tort law, compensating plaintiffs for losses that are indirect but foreseeable results of the defendant's actions. These damages help make the injured party whole, covering losses such as lost profits, business opportunities, or future income that directly stem from a breach or wrongful act.
RELATED Blog
comments