Political Law at Eswatini
Political law in Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) is shaped by its unique monarchy system, where the country is one of the last absolute monarchies in the world. The political and legal system in Eswatini combines both traditional and modern legal structures, but the monarchy holds significant power. Below is an overview of the key aspects of Eswatini’s political law:
1. Constitution of Eswatini (2005)
Eswatini's political framework is largely defined by the Constitution of 2005, which replaced the 1973 Proclamation that effectively made Eswatini an absolute monarchy. The 2005 Constitution was intended to introduce a more democratic structure, but in practice, the monarchy retains vast powers.
The Constitution provides for the establishment of both a bicameral Parliament (with an elected House of Assembly and a largely appointed Senate) and an independent judiciary, although the King holds significant executive powers, particularly in decisions regarding national security and constitutional amendments.
The Constitution emphasizes human rights protections, but it also states that these rights are subject to restrictions if the King deems them to be against national interests or security.
2. Monarchy and the King’s Powers
Eswatini is a constitutional monarchy, with King Mswati III (who has been in power since 1986) holding considerable influence over political decisions. The King’s powers are extensive, and he is considered both the head of state and the head of government.
The King appoints the Prime Minister and other key government officials and plays a central role in the country’s political, legal, and cultural life.
The King has the authority to dissolve Parliament and appoint members to the Senate and the Cabinet. Furthermore, the King’s consent is required for all legislative bills, meaning that his influence is felt in the law-making process.
The King has the power to declare emergency rule, suspend the Constitution, and issue decrees that have the force of law.
3. Parliament of Eswatini
Bicameral Parliament: The Parliament consists of the House of Assembly and the Senate.
House of Assembly: It consists of 59 members, 55 of whom are elected by the people through a system of indirect elections. Four are appointed by the King.
Senate: It consists of 30 members, most of whom are appointed by the King, while some are selected by the House of Assembly.
Legislative Function: While Parliament can propose and debate laws, the King has significant authority to approve or veto any legislative measures.
Limited Political Pluralism: Political parties are effectively banned, and only individuals can stand for election. Political opposition is often repressed, and this severely limits democratic participation.
4. The Executive Branch
Prime Minister: The Prime Minister is appointed by the King and is typically a member of the ruling party. The Prime Minister is the head of government and is responsible for running the daily affairs of the state.
The Cabinet consists of government ministers, many of whom are appointed by the King. Ministers are responsible for different sectors of government, such as finance, education, and health.
The King's power in the executive branch is substantial, as he controls the appointment of key positions and influences decision-making processes.
5. The Judiciary
The judiciary in Eswatini is independent in theory, but in practice, its independence is compromised by the King's powers. The King appoints the Chief Justice and other high-ranking judges, and this can influence their rulings.
Court System: Eswatini’s judicial system includes the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and various lower courts. The judiciary has jurisdiction over civil, criminal, and constitutional matters, but it has faced criticism for not always upholding the principles of justice when they conflict with royal interests.
Human Rights: The judiciary is often limited in its ability to rule against the monarchy’s interests. Courts have historically faced pressure, particularly in cases involving political freedoms, freedom of expression, and assembly.
6. Political Parties and Elections
Eswatini is not a multi-party democracy. Political parties were banned in 1973, and citizens must run as individual candidates in elections rather than as representatives of political parties.
Elections for the House of Assembly are held every five years. Voters elect representatives through an indirect election system, where local councils choose candidates for the national legislature.
Election Process: The election system is criticized for being undemocratic, as the King has the ability to appoint members of Parliament and influence the overall political landscape.
Limited Political Participation: Political dissent and opposition movements are often suppressed. Protests and activism advocating for democratic reforms have been met with state crackdowns.
7. Human Rights and Civil Liberties
Freedom of Expression: While the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, press, and assembly, these rights are often restricted in practice. The government has historically cracked down on opposition voices, journalists, and human rights activists.
Freedom of Assembly: Protests are often banned or dispersed by security forces. In recent years, there have been several protests, particularly in relation to demands for democratic reforms, which were met with violent repression.
Political Dissent: Political parties and organized opposition movements are not allowed to freely operate. Leaders and activists advocating for a multi-party system or for the reduction of the King’s powers have faced harassment, arrest, or exile.
8. Role of Traditional Institutions
Traditional Leadership: Eswatini places significant emphasis on traditional leadership and the role of the chiefs and royal family in governance. The country’s legal system is influenced by both modern law (the Constitution) and customary law, with a significant role played by traditional structures.
Tinkhundla System: This system of governance divides the country into political regions, known as tinkhundla, where local councils choose candidates for the House of Assembly. The system is highly criticized for limiting democratic participation and maintaining control in the hands of the monarchy and royal elites.
9. Recent Developments
In recent years, Eswatini has witnessed a growing demand for democracy and political reforms, particularly after the 2018 protests and the events in 2021 when pro-democracy demonstrations called for an end to the monarchy’s absolute power. In response, the government has imposed stricter controls and crackdowns on dissent.
International organizations, including the United Nations and Human Rights Watch, have expressed concerns about the state of human rights in Eswatini, particularly regarding political freedoms and the treatment of activists.
Summary
In summary, Eswatini's political law is dominated by the absolute power of the monarchy, with limited democratic mechanisms. The King has substantial influence over the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. While the Constitution nominally provides for certain rights and democratic processes, the political system remains highly centralized and repressive. Political opposition, freedom of speech, and civil liberties are significantly constrained, and Eswatini's system continues to evolve under the King’s leadership amidst growing calls for democratic reforms.
RELATED Blog
0 comments