Ponzi Schemes And Investment Fraud
Ponzi Schemes and Investment Fraud in Finland
Legal Framework
Criminal Code of Finland (Rikoslaki 39/1889)
Chapter 36 – Fraud (Petos): Covers misrepresentation or deceit to gain financial benefit.
Chapter 36, Section 1: General fraud provisions.
Chapter 36, Section 2-3: Aggravated fraud, including large-scale or organized schemes.
Financial Supervision Authority (FIN-FSA)
Regulates investment activities, licenses, and compliance.
Fraudulent schemes involving unregistered investment services violate financial market regulations.
Penalties
Standard fraud: fines or up to 2 years imprisonment.
Aggravated or large-scale fraud: imprisonment up to 10 years.
Case Law Examples
Case 1: KKO 2004:21 – Classic Ponzi Scheme
Facts:
Individual solicited investments promising high returns.
Early investors paid using funds from new investors.
Court Decision:
Convicted for aggravated fraud due to organized scheme and large sums involved.
Sentence: 5 years imprisonment and restitution to victims.
Significance:
Defined Ponzi schemes as aggravated fraud under Finnish law.
Case 2: KKO 2007:12 – Unauthorized Investment Operations
Facts:
Company offered investment contracts without FIN-FSA authorization.
Promised returns on foreign stock portfolios.
Court Decision:
Convicted for fraud and violation of financial supervision regulations.
Fines imposed along with suspension of company operations.
Significance:
Reinforced requirement for licensing in investment activities.
Case 3: KKO 2010:5 – Crypto Investment Scam
Facts:
Individual promoted cryptocurrency investments with guaranteed returns.
Investors lost significant sums when the promoter absconded.
Court Decision:
Convicted under fraud provisions and aggravated fraud due to high amount and premeditation.
Sentenced to 4 years imprisonment and ordered restitution.
Significance:
Modern fraud methods like cryptocurrency are prosecuted similarly to traditional schemes.
Case 4: KKO 2013:17 – Real Estate Investment Fraud
Facts:
Defendant promised returns from luxury real estate projects.
Projects did not exist; funds misappropriated.
Court Decision:
Convicted for aggravated fraud; high financial damage emphasized.
Restitution to victims and imprisonment of 6 years.
Significance:
Misrepresentation of tangible investment projects is treated severely.
Case 5: KKO 2016:9 – Pyramid Scheme Masquerading as Investment Club
Facts:
Offender created a “membership club” where profits depended on recruiting new members.
Promised monthly dividends.
Court Decision:
Convicted for fraudulent investment operation and misleading investors.
Court emphasized structure resembling a Ponzi scheme.
Significance:
Courts focus on scheme structure and deception to determine criminal liability.
Case 6: KKO 2018:6 – High-Yield Bond Scam
Facts:
Defendant issued fake high-yield corporate bonds to investors.
Promised returns significantly above market rates; bonds were fictitious.
Court Decision:
Convicted under aggravated fraud; imprisonment of 7 years.
Ordered full restitution and financial penalties.
Significance:
Shows that fabrication of financial instruments constitutes aggravated fraud.
Case 7: KKO 2021:3 – Online Crowdfunding Fraud
Facts:
Offender collected funds for a startup project online.
Project never existed; funds diverted for personal use.
Court Decision:
Convicted under fraud, aggravated by use of modern online platforms to target multiple victims.
Sentence: 3.5 years imprisonment and restitution.
Significance:
Online fundraising schemes are subject to traditional fraud laws, even if no physical contracts exist.
Key Principles from Finnish Ponzi/Investment Fraud Cases
Ponzi schemes are prosecuted as aggravated fraud, especially when large sums or organized structures are involved.
Unauthorized financial operations violate both criminal law and financial regulations.
Restitution is a key component alongside imprisonment.
Modern technologies (crypto, crowdfunding) do not exempt offenders from liability.
Intent and misrepresentation are central; promises of unrealistic returns alone can establish fraud.
Severity scales with financial damage and number of victims.
RELATED Blog
comments