Prescription Drug Abuse Prosecutions
Legal Context: Prescription Drug Abuse in Finland
Prescription drug abuse is regulated primarily under:
The Finnish Criminal Code (Rikoslaki), Chapter 50–51: offenses related to narcotics.
Narcotics Act (Laki huumausaineiden rajoittamisesta, 1961): controls prescription and illicit drugs.
Types of offenses:
Possession of prescription drugs without a prescription.
Trafficking or selling prescription drugs.
Forging prescriptions or doctor’s notes.
Aggravating factors:
Large quantities.
Sale or distribution.
Involvement in organized networks.
Risk of harm to minors or public health.
Case 1: Helsinki Physician Prescription Fraud (2013)
Facts:
A doctor issued opioid prescriptions to patients known to be drug-seeking, without medical justification.
Charges:
Prescription fraud, aiding illegal possession of narcotics, endangering public health.
Court Reasoning:
Abuse of professional authority and breach of medical ethics were central aggravating factors.
The quantity of opioids involved increased the severity.
Outcome:
3 years imprisonment and revocation of medical license.
Significance:
Demonstrates that medical professionals can face criminal liability for prescription drug abuse facilitation.
Case 2: Espoo Pharmacy Theft and Sale (2014)
Facts:
An employee stole prescription drugs (benzodiazepines) from a pharmacy and sold them online.
Charges:
Theft, narcotics trafficking, illegal distribution of prescription drugs.
Court Reasoning:
Court emphasized the combination of theft and distribution.
Public health risk and organized sales were aggravating.
Outcome:
2.5 years imprisonment; restitution of €15,000 to pharmacy.
Significance:
Theft combined with illegal distribution leads to significantly harsher sentences than simple possession.
Case 3: Turku Forged Prescription Ring (2015)
Facts:
A group of individuals forged prescriptions for controlled medications (opioids and stimulants) and sold them.
Charges:
Forgery of documents, trafficking prescription drugs, organized criminal activity.
Court Reasoning:
Court highlighted planned, repeated criminal conduct.
Multiple victims (pharmacies and patients) increased severity.
Outcome:
Main perpetrators: 4 years imprisonment; minor accomplices: 1–2 years; fines imposed on the network.
Significance:
Shows organized networks forging prescriptions are treated as aggravated criminal cases.
Case 4: Helsinki Online Sale of Prescription Drugs (2016)
Facts:
An individual ran an online marketplace selling prescription medications (painkillers, sedatives) without prescriptions.
Charges:
Narcotics trafficking, illegal distribution, endangering public health.
Court Reasoning:
Online distribution increased accessibility and public risk.
Large number of sales and customer reach aggravated the offense.
Outcome:
3 years imprisonment; €50,000 confiscated from profits; ban from operating online pharmacies.
Significance:
Online sales of prescription drugs are heavily penalized due to wide public exposure.
Case 5: Oulu Doctor Shopping (2017)
Facts:
A patient obtained multiple prescriptions for the same narcotic from several doctors simultaneously, selling surplus medications.
Charges:
Narcotics trafficking, illegal possession, abuse of prescription system.
Court Reasoning:
Court emphasized intent to profit and repeated acquisition.
The abuse of legal prescription channels increased culpability.
Outcome:
2 years imprisonment; seizure of unsold drugs.
Significance:
Highlights that abusing multiple legal sources (“doctor shopping”) constitutes a serious offense.
Case 6: Helsinki Hospital Staff Diversion (2018)
Facts:
A nurse diverted hospital-supplied prescription opioids for personal use and distribution to acquaintances.
Charges:
Narcotics trafficking, breach of trust, illegal possession.
Court Reasoning:
Court considered position of trust and repeated diversion as aggravating.
Risk of harm to patients and community was emphasized.
Outcome:
3.5 years imprisonment; permanent ban from healthcare employment.
Significance:
Prescription drug abuse by healthcare staff is treated severely due to breach of professional trust and risk to public health.
Key Observations
Professional Abuse Increases Severity: Doctors, nurses, and pharmacists face heavier penalties when abusing their positions.
Trafficking vs. Possession: Sale or distribution significantly increases penalties compared to personal possession.
Organized Networks: Groups forging prescriptions or selling drugs systematically are treated as aggravated cases.
Online Platforms: Digital distribution is heavily penalized due to scale and risk.
Restitution and Bans: Courts often require confiscation of profits and professional bans for healthcare offenders.

comments