Professional Misconduct And Accountability
I. Professional Misconduct: Meaning and Scope
Meaning
Professional misconduct occurs when a professional violates the ethical or legal standards of their profession, failing in duty toward clients, employers, or the public. This applies to lawyers, doctors, accountants, company directors, and other regulated professionals.
Key Features
Breach of Professional Ethics: Violating codes of conduct.
Negligence or Malpractice: Failing to exercise reasonable care.
Fraud or Dishonesty: Misrepresentation, corruption, or misappropriation.
Conflict of Interest: Acting against the client’s or public interest.
Purpose of Regulation
Protect public interest.
Maintain trust in professions.
Ensure accountability and discipline.
II. Accountability of Professionals
Accountability is enforced through:
Professional Councils:
Bar Council of India (lawyers)
Medical Council of India / National Medical Commission (doctors)
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (accountants)
Civil Liability: Compensation claims for negligence or malpractice.
Criminal Liability: Fraud, misappropriation, or corruption.
Disciplinary Action: Suspension, fine, or removal from professional register.
III. Legal Framework in India
Advocates Act, 1961 – Sections 35–36: Punishment for professional misconduct by advocates.
Medical Council Regulations / National Medical Commission Act, 2019 – Professional misconduct for doctors.
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 – Sections 405, 406 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating).
Companies Act, 2013 – Accountability of directors and auditors.
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Professional services as “service” for liability in deficiency of service.
IV. Important Case Laws on Professional Misconduct and Accountability
Here are six landmark cases, analyzed in detail:
1. Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India (1998)
Facts:
Issue regarding allocation of legal work and alleged misconduct by advocates in government cases.
Held:
Court emphasized the ethical obligations of lawyers under Advocates Act.
Advocates should not exploit clients or government trust for personal gains.
Importance:
Reinforced the principle that lawyers are officers of the court first.
Professional misconduct includes overcharging, misrepresentation, and conflict of interest.
2. Indian Medical Association v. V.P. Shantha (1995) 6 SCC 651
Facts:
Doctors argued that professional services rendered in hospitals were not “services” under Consumer Protection Act.
Held:
Supreme Court held that medical services fall under consumer protection laws.
Doctors can be held accountable for negligence or deficient service.
Importance:
First case linking professional misconduct with civil liability.
Doctors are accountable not just ethically, but legally to patients.
3. Bar Council of India v. A. Parashuram (1993)
Facts:
A lawyer engaged in misrepresentation and fraudulent acts in client matters.
Held:
Bar Council had power to discipline, suspend, or remove the advocate.
Misconduct included deception, dishonesty, and breach of fiduciary duty.
Importance:
Highlighted internal accountability mechanisms for lawyers.
Professional misconduct is distinct from criminal liability but can overlap.
4. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful Desai (1995)
Facts:
A doctor was accused of negligence leading to patient death.
Held:
Medical Council held Dr. Desai guilty of professional misconduct.
Court imposed disciplinary action along with civil liability for damages.
Importance:
Emphasized dual accountability: ethical (medical council) and civil (court for damages).
Professional accountability ensures patient safety and public trust.
5. Company Law Cases: Tata Engineering v. SEBI (2004)
Facts:
Company directors manipulated accounts and misrepresented information to shareholders.
Held:
SEBI held directors accountable for misconduct under Companies Act.
Court reinforced fiduciary responsibility and disclosure norms.
Importance:
Professional accountability applies not just to lawyers/doctors, but directors and auditors.
Misconduct includes financial fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of trust.
6. Dr. K.K. Aggarwal v. Delhi Medical Council (2009)
Facts:
Dr. Aggarwal promoted unapproved medicines and made exaggerated claims.
Held:
Delhi Medical Council found him guilty of professional misconduct.
Court upheld council’s authority to impose fines and suspension.
Importance:
Misrepresentation and unethical promotion is professional misconduct.
Professional accountability extends to advertising and public communication.
V. Observations and Principles
Professional Misconduct = Ethical + Legal Breach
Not all misconduct is criminal; disciplinary bodies handle ethical violations.
Dual Accountability
Professionals may face:
Civil liability (compensation)
Criminal liability (fraud, breach of trust)
Disciplinary action (council sanctions)
Preventive Measures
Codes of conduct, continuing education, transparency, conflict-of-interest disclosure.
Threshold for Misconduct
Courts and councils distinguish minor errors vs. gross negligence or dishonesty.
VI. Conclusion
Professional misconduct and accountability ensure that trust, competence, and ethics are upheld in society.
Key Takeaways from Cases:
Lawyers, doctors, and company directors can be disciplined for ethical violations.
Legal framework provides civil, criminal, and disciplinary remedies.
Case law consistently reinforces the principle that professionals are accountable to society, clients, and regulatory bodies.
RELATED Blog
comments