Prosecution Of Attacks On Journalists Covering Protests
Attacks on journalists, especially while covering protests or sensitive issues, are a critical concern for media freedom and the public’s right to information. In India, the legal system and courts have had to navigate complex issues involving the protection of journalists, the freedom of the press, and the rights of individuals to protest. Attacks on journalists, whether physical, psychological, or through threats, are often seen as efforts to suppress freedom of expression and restrict media coverage of protests or dissenting opinions.
While the Indian Penal Code (IPC) provides legal remedies for such attacks, the Constitutional guarantees under Article 19(1)(a), which ensures the right to freedom of speech and expression, come into conflict with the enforcement of law during volatile situations like public protests. Below are five significant cases of attacks on journalists covering protests, showing the legal responses and the prosecution of such crimes.
**Case 1: The Attack on Journalists During the Anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) Protests (2020)
Overview: In December 2019 and January 2020, anti-CAA protests erupted across India, particularly in Delhi. These protests saw violent clashes between demonstrators and police forces. During these events, several journalists were physically assaulted or detained by police while attempting to cover the protests. One of the most high-profile incidents involved journalists being targeted by law enforcement for their coverage.
Facts: Journalists reporting on the protests were reportedly subjected to beatings, detention, and threats by police officers. Notably, Madhurima Pandey, a reporter for NDTV, was attacked by police while covering the protests in North East Delhi. In another instance, Ravish Kumar of NDTV was threatened by police officers who verbally assaulted him for reporting live from the protest site.
Legal Charges: The Delhi Police was accused of using excessive force against journalists, violating their right to report, which is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. The attacks were condemned by various media organizations, and complaints were filed against the officers involved. The legal claims included charges under Section 323 (causing harm), Section 341 (wrongful restraint), and Section 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code.
Court’s Ruling: The Delhi High Court intervened, emphasizing the need for authorities to uphold the rights of journalists and the freedom of press. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) also took cognizance of the matter and issued guidelines for the police on protecting journalists while they cover public protests.
Significance: This case highlights the systemic risks to press freedom during politically sensitive protests. It also pointed out the need for police reforms and for sensitive handling of media professionals during public demonstrations.
**Case 2: The Attack on Journalists During the 2012 Anti-Rape Protest in Delhi (2012)
Overview: The 2012 Delhi Gang Rape case led to massive protests across the country. The protestors, mostly students and women’s rights groups, demanded justice for the victim and reforms in the criminal justice system. During these protests, several journalists were targeted, especially by police forces trying to prevent media coverage of violent clashes with demonstrators.
Facts: In the aftermath of the gang rape incident, journalists covering the mass protests in Delhi were attacked by the police. One well-documented case was that of Gauri Lankesh, who was harassed by police officers while reporting on the anti-rape protest. In another case, Tarun Tejpal, the editor of a leading magazine, was attacked by protestors who claimed he was misrepresenting their cause in the media.
Legal Charges: The attacks on journalists were addressed under Section 323 (punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), Section 342 (wrongful confinement), and Section 353 (assault or criminal force to deter a public servant) of the IPC. Protests were made to the Press Council of India (PCI), and numerous legal challenges were filed by media associations demanding protection for journalists covering sensitive topics.
Court’s Ruling: In response, the Delhi High Court ruled that journalists should not be subjected to violence or obstruction while performing their professional duties, especially in protest situations. The court also directed the Delhi Police to enhance training for officers on dealing with the media in sensitive public gatherings.
Significance: This case exposed how journalists covering protests are sometimes treated as adversaries, and it led to more significant discussions on the need for police accountability when it comes to press freedom. The case also contributed to the national conversation about police misconduct during public protests.
**Case 3: The Attack on Journalists in the Bhima Koregaon Protests (2018)
Overview: The Bhima Koregaon violence of January 2018 involved clashes between Dalit groups and Hindu right-wing organizations. During the protests that followed, several journalists were attacked by protestors and state security forces. The journalists who were covering the violence, which included disturbing reports of human rights violations, were targeted both physically and via legal harassment.
Facts: Journalists such as Kunal Kamra were verbally attacked and physically pushed by protestors for covering the incidents. Police officers also detained journalists without cause, accusing them of reporting information that could “incite violence.” Video evidence showed journalists being pushed by riot police and detained for questioning.
Legal Charges: In response to the incidents, the Journalists’ Union filed complaints against the Maharashtra Police for wrongful detention, assault, and interfering with the work of journalists. Legal proceedings were initiated under Section 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), Section 341 (wrongful restraint), and Section 354 (outraging the modesty of a woman) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Court’s Ruling: The case highlighted the tension between public order and press freedom. The Bombay High Court ruled that while the state had a duty to maintain law and order, journalists must not be obstructed from reporting on protests. It also emphasized that the media plays a critical role in providing transparency and holding the state accountable.
Significance: The Bhima Koregaon case highlighted how protests with political overtones often place journalists at the risk of both public retaliation and state repression. The case led to discussions on the necessity of clear laws protecting journalists from such attacks.
**Case 4: The Attack on Journalists Covering the 2019 Shaheen Bagh Protests (2020)
Overview: The Shaheen Bagh protests were organized to oppose the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and were widely covered by the media. During the protests, several journalists faced violence and threats from both protestors and police personnel.
Facts: A significant attack occurred when journalists from both national and international outlets were physically assaulted by protestors accusing them of misreporting the events. In other instances, journalists were detained by police for asking questions about the handling of the protest. In one high-profile instance, Aastha Khurana, a journalist, was threatened by police for filming a confrontation during the protests.
Legal Charges: The journalists involved in this incident filed complaints under Section 323 (causing hurt), Section 341 (wrongful restraint), and Section 500 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code. The case also led to discussions on the role of the media in democracy and the legal protections available for journalists in protest coverage.
Court’s Ruling: The Delhi High Court directed that police should protect journalists and that authorities should ensure that they are not obstructed in carrying out their journalistic duties. The Court also requested a detailed investigation into the allegations of misuse of power by the police.
Significance: The Shaheen Bagh protests case emphasized the risk journalists face when covering politically charged protests. The court ruling reaffirmed the importance of free speech and the media’s right to report without fear of retaliation or intimidation.
**Case 5: The Attack on Journalists During the 2020 Farmers' Protest (2020-2021)
Overview: The farmers' protest against the Farm Laws in India witnessed significant media coverage. However, journalists faced attacks from both protestors and law enforcement while covering the agitation.
RELATED Blog
comments