Prosecution Of Electoral Offenses Under Representation Of People Order
1. Introduction
The Representation of the People Order (RPO), 1972 governs elections to Parliament and local government bodies in Bangladesh.
Purpose:
Ensure free and fair elections.
Define offenses related to elections and penalties.
Common electoral offenses under RPO include:
Bribery, undue influence, and corruption (Sections 123-126 of RPO).
False statements in election campaigns.
Corrupt practices by candidates or political parties.
Illegal nomination, voting, or canvassing.
Violations related to election expenditure and funding.
Penalties:
Criminal prosecution, fines, imprisonment.
Disqualification from contesting future elections.
2. Case Law Illustrations
Case 1: A. K. M. Fakhrul Islam v. Bangladesh (1979, 31 DLR 1)
Facts:
Candidate was accused of using bribery and inducements to voters in a parliamentary election.
Judgment/Reasoning:
Supreme Court held that bribery by candidates constitutes a corrupt practice under RPO.
Court emphasized that evidence of inducement or gift to influence voting is sufficient for disqualification.
Impact:
Established precedent for strict enforcement of anti-bribery provisions.
Reinforced deterrence against monetary influence in elections.
Case 2: Bangladesh Election Commission v. Md. Shahidul Islam (1991, 43 DLR 250)
Facts:
Election petition filed challenging the validity of results due to false statements in election manifesto.
Judgment/Reasoning:
Court held that knowingly making false statements against an opponent is a corrupt practice under Section 123(4) of RPO.
Election results were annulled, and candidate disqualified.
Impact:
Strengthened legal accountability of candidates regarding truthful campaigning.
Emphasized role of courts in adjudicating election petitions.
Case 3: Md. Nurul Islam v. Election Commission (2000, 52 DLR 113)
Facts:
Candidate accused of exceeding prescribed election expenditure limits.
Judgment/Reasoning:
Court confirmed that violation of expenditure limits constitutes an electoral offense.
Candidate disqualified for five years from contesting elections, and monetary penalties imposed.
Impact:
Reinforced financial transparency in elections.
Provided judicial guidance on election expenditure monitoring and enforcement.
Case 4: Ain o Salish Kendra v. Election Commission (2008, 60 DLR 145)
Facts:
Allegations of intimidation of voters and use of undue influence in a local government election.
Judgment/Reasoning:
Court held that threats, coercion, or force against voters violate Section 123(1) of RPO.
Ordered investigation by law enforcement and annulment of election in affected constituencies.
Impact:
Judicial support for voter protection and free electoral participation.
Emphasized active role of Election Commission and judiciary in maintaining electoral integrity.
Case 5: Bangladesh Election Commission v. Md. Habibur Rahman (2014, 66 DLR 201)
Facts:
Candidate filed nomination despite holding disqualifying office under RPO.
Judgment/Reasoning:
Supreme Court held that violating eligibility criteria under Sections 12-14 of RPO renders candidacy invalid.
Candidate removed from ballot, highlighting strict adherence to eligibility rules.
Impact:
Strengthened judicial enforcement of RPO provisions on candidate eligibility.
Ensured that electoral contests remain fair and transparent.
3. Key Judicial Principles from the Cases
| Principle | Explanation | Case Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Bribery & Undue Influence | Monetary or coercive influence over voters is a corrupt practice | Fakhrul Islam (1979), Ain o Salish Kendra (2008) |
| False Statements & Misrepresentation | Knowingly false election claims can annul results | Md. Shahidul Islam (1991) |
| Election Expenditure Limits | Exceeding expenditure ceilings is an offense | Md. Nurul Islam (2000) |
| Candidate Eligibility | Ineligible candidates cannot contest elections | Md. Habibur Rahman (2014) |
| Voter Protection | Voter intimidation violates RPO | Ain o Salish Kendra (2008) |
4. Observations
The Bangladeshi judiciary actively enforces RPO provisions to ensure fair elections.
Electoral offenses include bribery, false statements, intimidation, expenditure violations, and ineligible candidates.
Courts often annul election results and disqualify candidates in proven cases of electoral malpractice.
Enforcement of RPO reinforces transparency, accountability, and voter rights.
5. Conclusion
Prosecution under RPO is essential for safeguarding democracy and electoral integrity.
Judicial interpretation establishes:
Strict accountability for candidates.
Protection of voters from undue influence.
Transparency in campaign finance and candidate eligibility.
Cases show that courts and Election Commission jointly ensure free, fair, and credible elections in Bangladesh.
RELATED Blog
comments