Prosecution Of Fake Educational Institutions Granting Degrees
Prosecution of Fake Educational Institutions in Nepal
Fake educational institutions—colleges, universities, or training centers that issue invalid degrees—pose serious risks to students, employers, and national education standards. Nepal’s legal system addresses such crimes under the Muluki Criminal Code, Education Act, and consumer protection provisions. Criminal liability arises when an institution knowingly misleads students, issues fraudulent certificates, or operates without government approval.
Legal Framework
Muluki Criminal Code (2017)
Section 207–208: Cheating and fraud.
Section 220: Forgery of documents.
Section 235: Fraud and misrepresentation causing economic loss.
Education Act (1971) and Regulations
Only government-recognized institutions can grant degrees.
Operating without accreditation constitutes a violation.
Consumer Protection Principles
Students as consumers are entitled to truthful information regarding courses, accreditation, and certificates.
Detailed Case Studies
Case 1: Fake University in Kathmandu Granting Foreign Degrees
Facts:
A private institution in Kathmandu advertised foreign degrees from a non-existent university in the U.S., charging high fees to students. Many students later discovered that the degrees were invalid.
Legal Provisions Invoked:
Muluki Criminal Code Section 207–208: cheating and fraud.
Section 220: forgery of certificates.
Court Reasoning:
Court noted that the institution intentionally deceived students and misrepresented its accreditation status.
Fraudulent documents and bank transactions proved intent to cheat.
Significance:
One of the earliest high-profile cases addressing fake foreign degree scams.
Set a precedent for holding operators criminally liable under fraud provisions.
Case 2: Private College Issuing Fake Nursing Certificates
Facts:
A private college issued nursing degrees without affiliation to the Council of Nursing or any recognized authority. Graduates attempted to get employment abroad but were denied due to invalid degrees.
Legal Provisions Invoked:
Education Act Sections: operation without accreditation.
Muluki Criminal Code Section 207: cheating and misrepresentation.
Court Reasoning:
Court emphasized student reliance on the institution’s misrepresentation.
Directors were held criminally liable and sentenced to imprisonment and fines.
Significance:
Strengthened enforcement of affiliation requirements.
Highlighted the impact of fraudulent institutions on professional credibility.
Case 3: Online Diploma Mills
Facts:
An online platform offered diplomas and degrees from fake institutions. Students paid through online transfers and received certificates by email.
Legal Provisions Invoked:
Electronic Transactions Act 2008, Section 47: online fraud.
Muluki Criminal Code Section 207–208: cheating and forgery.
Court Reasoning:
Court ruled that electronic issuance of fake certificates constitutes fraud and forgery.
Digital evidence (emails, payment records) was crucial in establishing criminal intent.
Significance:
First case recognizing online “diploma mills” in Nepal.
Encouraged authorities to monitor online education scams.
Case 4: Technical Training Institute Issuing Engineering Degrees
Facts:
A technical institute issued engineering degrees without affiliation to Tribhuvan University or the Council of Technical Education and Vocational Training. Students enrolled believing the degrees were valid for government jobs.
Legal Provisions Invoked:
Muluki Criminal Code Section 207–208: cheating.
Education Act Section: operating without recognition.
Court Reasoning:
Court highlighted intent to deceive students and profit unlawfully.
Sentences included fines and revocation of institutional license.
Significance:
Clarified that technical institutions also need accreditation.
Emphasized criminal liability for misleading students about career prospects.
Case 5: Fake Foreign Language Certification Center
Facts:
A center advertised “official” certificates in English, French, and German, claiming international recognition. Investigations revealed no affiliation with any recognized foreign authority.
Legal Provisions Invoked:
Muluki Criminal Code Section 207: cheating and economic fraud.
Section 220: forgery of documents.
Court Reasoning:
Court focused on deception in misrepresentation of international accreditation.
Operators were found guilty of defrauding dozens of students.
Significance:
Reinforced that claims of foreign affiliation without proof constitute criminal fraud.
Raised awareness about due diligence in enrolling in language courses.
Case 6: Fake Medical College Offering MBBS Degrees
Facts:
A private institution claimed to provide MBBS degrees with approval from the Nepal Medical Council, but the council confirmed no such recognition existed. Some graduates attempted to register with hospitals but were blocked.
Legal Provisions Invoked:
Muluki Criminal Code Section 207–208: cheating and misrepresentation.
Education Act & Nepal Medical Council Act: operating without valid license.
Court Reasoning:
Court emphasized public safety implications—patients could have been harmed by unqualified doctors.
Operators were sentenced to imprisonment, fines, and the college was shut down.
Significance:
Strong example of criminal liability when fake institutions endanger public welfare.
Set a benchmark for regulatory oversight of professional degrees.
Key Observations
Criminal liability arises mainly under cheating, fraud, and forgery provisions.
Operating without government recognition or affiliation is a strong aggravating factor.
Online and offline scams are treated equally under the law.
Student reliance and economic loss are central to proving intent and harm.
High-profile cases involving professional degrees (medical, engineering, nursing) attract stricter penalties due to public safety concerns.
Courts emphasize both punishment for operators and protection of victims (students).
RELATED Blog
comments