Prosecution Of Fake Land Survey Scams In Nepal
Legal Framework
In Nepal, prosecution of fake land survey and registration scams primarily involves:
Muluki Criminal Code, 2074
Sections on forgery, criminal conspiracy, misuse of office, and fraud.
Land (Survey and Measurement) Act, 2019
Governs survey offices, official survey procedures, and legal registration of land.
Land Revenue and Survey Department Regulations
Provides rules for accurate survey and registration.
CIAA and Central Investigation Bureau (CIB)
Investigate public officials involved in land fraud.
Key criminal acts include:
Forging survey documents or creating fake tenant records.
Misregistering government or communal land in private names.
Collusion between survey officials, revenue officers, brokers, and private actors.
Criminal conspiracy to commit land-related fraud.
Case Studies
Case 1: Lalita Niwas Land Scam (Kathmandu)
Facts:
Government land in Baluwatar, Kathmandu (~136 ropanis) was registered to private individuals through fake tenants.
Survey office employees colluded with middlemen to declare the land “non-government” and facilitate registration.
Legal Issues:
Forgery of official survey and registration documents.
Criminal conspiracy and misuse of public office.
Outcome:
Over 100 individuals, including survey officials and businessmen, convicted.
Land recovered (113 ropanis) and returned to the government.
Sentences included imprisonment of 2–3 years and fines of several million rupees.
Significance:
Demonstrates liability of both public officials and private actors in collusive land fraud.
Case 2: Damak/Jhapa Public Land Fraud
Facts:
Around 59 bighas of government land were illegally transferred to private individuals during re-survey.
Survey officers and revenue officials helped private parties manipulate survey records.
Legal Issues:
Misuse of survey authority, forgery of government documents, criminal breach of trust.
Outcome:
172 individuals, including survey officers, faced criminal charges.
Land recovery proceedings initiated; fines imposed.
Significance:
Shows vulnerability of regional survey offices to fraudulent land registration.
Case 3: Rautahat Land Survey Fraud
Facts:
Local officials in Rautahat district manipulated survey data and registered land to individuals for private sale.
Payments were collected from buyers despite government ownership.
Legal Issues:
Collusion between survey officers and private actors to commit fraud.
Breach of trust and misuse of public office.
Outcome:
Arrest warrants issued for the survey team head and local politicians.
Investigation is ongoing with potential criminal charges for conspiracy and fraud.
Significance:
Highlights the role of survey team leaders and local officials in facilitating fake registration.
Case 4: Systemic Survey Tampering (CIAA Report Findings)
Facts:
Multiple survey office employees were found accepting bribes to alter maps and survey data.
Government land was misrepresented as private to allow illegal registration.
Legal Issues:
Bribery, forgery of official documents, misuse of office.
Outcome:
Administrative and criminal actions recommended by CIAA.
Some officials charged with corruption and land-related fraud.
Significance:
Illustrates structural weaknesses in Nepal’s survey and registration system.
Case 5: Rural Survey Camp Misregistration
Facts:
A rural survey camp registered government land under private names despite legal restrictions.
Survey camp officials signed off on incorrect registration deeds.
Legal Issues:
Violation of the Land (Survey and Measurement) Act.
Criminal liability for survey officers who authorized illegal registration.
Outcome:
Supreme Court nullified the registration and restored land to government ownership.
Survey officials were held accountable.
Significance:
Shows judicial oversight in correcting survey-related fraud.
Case 6: Multi-Defendant Forgery in Kathmandu
Facts:
Hundreds of individuals were involved in forging survey and registration documents to acquire government land.
Officials colluded to create fake tenants and manipulate survey reports.
Legal Issues:
Forgery, conspiracy, misuse of survey authority.
Outcome:
Over 300 individuals charged.
Criminal prosecution ongoing; land recovery in progress.
Significance:
Highlights the scale and organized nature of such scams.
Case 7: Kathmandu Valley Land Collusion Case
Facts:
Certain government lands were transferred to private developers with forged survey approvals.
Survey officials signed off on false documents to facilitate urban development projects.
Legal Issues:
Criminal conspiracy, forgery, abuse of public office.
Outcome:
Survey officials dismissed and prosecuted.
Some private actors sentenced to fines and imprisonment.
Significance:
Demonstrates the interface of urban development and survey-related corruption.
Key Observations
Survey and Registration Officials are Vulnerable Points – Most cases involve collusion between public officials and private actors.
Forgery is the Primary Charge – Fake survey reports and registration deeds are central to prosecution.
Land Recovery is a Key Remedy – Courts often order restitution of illegally transferred land.
Public and Private Liability – Both officials and private parties face criminal liability.
Systemic Weaknesses – Many scams reveal structural flaws in survey, registration, and land governance systems.
RELATED Blog
comments