Prosecution Of Fraudulent Ngos In Nepal
1. Fake WFP Office Scam, Kathmandu
Facts: A group of individuals set up a fake office in Budhanilkantha, Kathmandu, claiming to represent the World Food Programme (WFP). They solicited donations from the public and organizations, presenting forged official documents.
Fraud Mechanism: They used fake identity cards, letterheads, and posed as senior officials to collect money. Victims were promised development aid projects or humanitarian assistance.
Investigation & Prosecution: Kathmandu Police investigated, arrested the main suspects, and registered a case under the criminal code sections relating to fraud, forgery, and misrepresentation.
Outcome/Significance: The case highlighted the vulnerability of donors and the misuse of well-known international NGO names to commit fraud. It underscored the need for verifying NGO credentials.
2. Misappropriation by Faith Nepal NGO, Dhanusha
Facts: Faith Nepal, registered as a poverty-alleviation NGO, diverted funds received from the Poverty Alleviation Fund. Money meant for underprivileged groups in Dhanusha did not reach beneficiaries.
Fraud Mechanism: The program coordinator and board members misappropriated approximately NPR 5.7 million for personal expenses instead of distributing them to intended groups.
Investigation & Prosecution: CIAA (Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority) intervened, documented financial irregularities, and filed charges under misappropriation and abuse of authority.
Outcome/Significance: Demonstrated that even registered NGOs with government funding can engage in fraud. Reinforced the importance of auditing and oversight of NGOs.
3. Campaign Against Irregularities and Corruption Scam, Gokarneshwar
Facts: A group formed an organization claiming to fight corruption, called the Campaign Against Irregularities and Corruption. They extorted money from local businesses and government offices, claiming to represent a legitimate NGO.
Fraud Mechanism: Threats of reporting corruption and promising resolution of issues were used to obtain bribes and donations.
Investigation & Prosecution: Kathmandu District Police arrested the suspects and filed cases under fraud, extortion, and criminal intimidation provisions.
Outcome/Significance: Shows how NGO facades can be misused for extortion and illustrates the thin line between civil society activism and criminal fraud.
4. Love & Hope / Love Nepal Foreign NGO Fraud
Facts: A Swedish NGO claiming to rescue Nepali girls and run shelters for hundreds of children solicited donations abroad. Investigations revealed that the shelters and rescue operations largely did not exist.
Fraud Mechanism: The NGO fabricated reports, inflated numbers of beneficiaries, and falsified documentation to secure foreign funds.
Investigation & Prosecution: Nepali authorities and civil society groups exposed the fraud, and discussions on legal action followed. Criminal prosecution for fraud was complicated due to the foreign registration of the NGO.
Outcome/Significance: Highlighted the risks of cross-border NGO operations and the need for due diligence by international donors.
5. Fake Bhutanese Refugee Resettlement Scam
Facts: Individuals set up a fraudulent operation claiming to assist Bhutanese refugees in Nepal for resettlement. They collected money from people claiming to be refugees.
Fraud Mechanism: False documentation and NGO-like organization were used to legitimize the scam. Money was collected under the guise of facilitating refugee status.
Investigation & Prosecution: The Kathmandu District Court and Government Attorney’s Office investigated. More than 30 suspects were charged under fraud, forgery, and organized crime provisions, including high-level officials.
Outcome/Significance: Demonstrated how humanitarian causes can be misused for large-scale financial fraud and the role of courts in prosecuting organized NGO fraud.
6. Social Welfare Fund Misuse Case, Kathmandu
Facts: A registered NGO operating health and education programs in Kathmandu misused funds allocated for marginalized communities. Donors believed the money was spent on infrastructure and scholarships.
Fraud Mechanism: Falsified financial statements, fake receipts, and ghost beneficiaries were used to divert funds into private accounts.
Investigation & Prosecution: CIAA and local police jointly investigated. Directors of the NGO were charged with criminal breach of trust, fraud, and misappropriation of donor funds.
Outcome/Significance: Reinforced that internal governance failures can turn registered NGOs into instruments of fraud; criminal prosecution is possible under Nepali law.
7. International Aid Misuse by Relief NGO, Pokhara
Facts: A relief NGO collecting funds for earthquake victims in Pokhara was found diverting aid supplies and donations to private storage and resale.
Fraud Mechanism: Donated goods and cash were misused, and beneficiaries received little or nothing. Fake documentation was used to cover tracks.
Investigation & Prosecution: Police and district authorities filed cases under fraud, misappropriation, and forgery laws.
Outcome/Significance: Emphasized that disaster relief operations require strict auditing; misuse constitutes criminal liability.
Key Observations from All Cases
Methods of Fraud: Fake documentation, identity misrepresentation, ghost beneficiaries, and false claims of humanitarian activity.
Legal Response: CIAA, police, and courts have authority to prosecute under fraud, misappropriation, forgery, and organized crime laws.
Vulnerabilities: Both local and foreign donors are at risk; registration alone does not guarantee legitimacy.
Significance: Each case reinforces the principle that NGOs operating in Nepal are accountable under criminal law if they engage in fraudulent activities.
RELATED Blog
comments