Prosecution Of Online Harassment, Cyberbullying, And Digital Threats
The prosecution of online harassment, cyberbullying, and digital threats has become an increasingly critical issue as more individuals and groups experience harmful behavior via digital platforms. These offenses can involve direct threats, malicious communications, or harassment using social media, messaging apps, or other online communication tools. Courts have addressed these issues through both criminal and civil litigation, using statutes designed for traditional harassment and adapting them to the digital age. Below are several landmark cases that illustrate how online harassment, cyberbullying, and digital threats are prosecuted and enforced under the law.
1. People v. Keith (2014)
Court: California Court of Appeal
Crime: Cyberbullying, harassment via social media
Legal Issue: The use of social media to harass and intimidate under California's harassment laws
Case Background: In People v. Keith, a California defendant, Keith, was convicted for repeatedly sending harassing and threatening messages through Facebook to his ex-girlfriend. The messages included vulgar insults, threats of violence, and attempts to intimidate her, with the intent of causing emotional distress.
Keith had used multiple social media accounts to circumvent blocks set by the victim and continued his behavior over several months. He created fake profiles to further harass the victim, sending private messages and posting derogatory content publicly on her page.
Court's Analysis: The California Court of Appeal considered whether Keith’s actions fell within the scope of the California Penal Code section 646.9, which prohibits criminal harassment that causes a person to fear for their safety. The Court found that Keith’s actions clearly met the statutory definition of harassment: intentional and repeated communication with the victim that caused substantial emotional distress.
The court also discussed the implications of using online platforms for harassment and noted that the law must evolve with technology. Online harassment, the court stated, can have the same detrimental impact as in-person harassment, if not more so, due to the widespread reach and anonymity of the internet.
Outcome: Keith’s conviction was upheld, and he was sentenced to probation with conditions including no contact with the victim and completion of counseling. This case was important in affirming that cyberbullying and online harassment are not only actionable but can also result in criminal penalties, especially when the victim’s safety is threatened.
2. United States v. Drew (2008)
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Crime: Cyberbullying, online harassment, and criminal conspiracy under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
Legal Issue: Prosecution for cyberbullying and emotional distress caused via the internet
Case Background: The United States v. Drew case involved a defendant, Lori Drew, who was accused of creating a fake MySpace profile to impersonate a teenage boy, "Josh Evans." Drew's purpose was to harass a 13-year-old girl, Megan Meier, who had previously been the victim of bullying. Drew, through the fake profile, began sending Megan flirtatious and eventually cruel messages, leading to Megan’s emotional distress and, ultimately, her suicide.
The prosecution relied on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), arguing that Drew violated the law by accessing MySpace's computers and using them to cause harm through the fraudulent impersonation of another person.
Court's Analysis: The district court initially convicted Drew for using a computer to impersonate a person with the intent to harm, but the decision was overturned on appeal. The Ninth Circuit ruled that while Drew's actions were reprehensible, they did not clearly fall under the specific language of the CFAA, which requires the defendant to have accessed a computer or system in a manner that caused damage or loss. The appellate court found that there was no specific "hacking" involved, and the law was not designed to address the nuances of cyberbullying.
Outcome: The charges were dismissed, and Drew was acquitted. This case highlighted the limitations of existing federal laws in addressing cyberbullying directly. It underscored the need for clearer legislation to target online harassment and digital threats and served as a catalyst for legislative changes in states and the federal government.
3. State v. Van Buren (2017)
Court: New Jersey Superior Court
Crime: Online harassment and digital threats via text messages
Legal Issue: Prosecution of digital threats and harassment under state criminal law
Case Background: In State v. Van Buren, the defendant, Van Buren, was accused of sending threatening text messages to his ex-girlfriend after their relationship ended. The messages included threats of violence and explicit demands that she meet his terms or face physical harm. The harassment escalated over several weeks, with more threatening messages sent after the victim blocked Van Buren’s phone number and he resorted to using email and social media accounts.
The prosecution charged Van Buren with criminal harassment under New Jersey Statutes Annotated section 2C:33-4, which prohibits harassment through repeated communications intended to cause emotional distress or alarm.
Court's Analysis: The court examined whether the content of the messages could be classified as threatening under the New Jersey harassment statute, which includes threats that cause fear of harm. The court noted that the repetition and severity of the threats, combined with the victim’s fear, clearly met the criteria for harassment. Furthermore, the court rejected the defense's argument that Van Buren’s actions were merely “free speech” and affirmed that threatening speech is not protected by the First Amendment when it instills fear in the victim.
Outcome: Van Buren was convicted of harassment and sentenced to probation with conditions that included a restraining order and mandatory counseling. This case illustrated that digital threats, particularly those that instill fear or cause harm, can lead to criminal prosecution even when they are not directed at a broad audience.
4. J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District (2002)
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Crime: Cyberbullying via a school-based platform
Legal Issue: The limits of school jurisdiction over off-campus online harassment
Case Background: In J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District, a student was subjected to online harassment after creating a fake and defamatory webpage targeting a teacher. The webpage was created by a student off-campus, but it involved the teacher’s name and was hosted on an external platform. When the teacher became aware of the page, she filed a complaint with the school, leading to the student’s suspension.
The case raised the issue of whether schools could regulate off-campus conduct (cyberbullying) that affects the on-campus environment. The student argued that the school had no jurisdiction over activities that occurred outside of school hours and off school grounds.
Court's Analysis: The Third Circuit ruled in favor of the school district, determining that the First Amendment did not protect the student's conduct when it caused a substantial disruption to the school environment. The court found that the school had the right to discipline the student for cyberbullying that interfered with the educational process and the well-being of the teacher, even though the actions took place off-campus.
Outcome: The court upheld the school’s disciplinary action. This case became a key precedent in the ongoing discussion of schools’ responsibilities in addressing online harassment, and it clarified that schools can discipline students for online conduct that causes harm to the school environment.
5. United States v. Papageorgiou (2011)
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Crime: Cyberstalking and threats of violence
Legal Issue: Cyberstalking and the use of online platforms to issue threats
Case Background: In United States v. Papageorgiou, the defendant, Papageorgiou, was charged with cyberstalking and issuing threats of violence against a former romantic partner. Over several months, Papageorgiou used email, social media platforms, and other online methods to send threatening messages, including promises of violence if the victim did not comply with his demands.
Papageorgiou’s conduct escalated to the point where the victim feared for her physical safety. The defendant was arrested and charged under 18 U.S.C. § 2261A, which criminalizes cyberstalking and the transmission of threats across state lines.
Court's Analysis: The court examined the specific threat messages and the context in which they were sent. It noted that cyberstalking laws apply regardless of the medium (whether by phone, email, or social media) and focus on the victim’s safety and the intent behind the communication. The court held that Papageorgiou’s repeated threats and his use of various online platforms constituted cyberstalking and that the use of interstate communication networks (e.g., email and social media) satisfied federal jurisdiction requirements.
Outcome: Papageorgiou was convicted of cyberstalking and sentenced to prison. This case helped reinforce the growing understanding that digital threats made over the internet, whether by social media or email, can be prosecuted under federal law, and it highlighted the seriousness with which courts treat online harassment and stalking.
Conclusion
These cases illustrate the diverse nature of online harassment, cyberbullying, and digital threats and how the legal system is adapting to prosecute these offenses effectively. The laws governing cyberbullying and digital harassment must continuously evolve to keep pace with technological changes and emerging forms of online behavior. Whether it is through social media, fake profiles, or direct threats, courts have increasingly recognized the damaging effects of online conduct and have developed legal frameworks to ensure accountability and protection for victims.
RELATED Blog
comments