Prosecution Of Poachers In Himalayan Regions
Legal Framework – Nepal
1. National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1973 (NPWCA)
Prohibits hunting, poaching, or capturing of wild animals.
Illegal hunting of endangered species (e.g., snow leopard, red panda, Himalayan tahr) is punishable.
Penalties include imprisonment, fines, and confiscation of equipment/vehicles.
Certain species are declared fully protected; hunting them can lead to 5–15 years of imprisonment under aggravated circumstances.
2. Forest Act, 1993
Protects forested areas, which include critical wildlife habitats in Himalayan regions.
Illegal hunting, timber extraction, or entry into protected areas without permits is punishable.
3. Muluki Criminal Code, 2017
Poaching can also be prosecuted under general criminal provisions for destruction of public property, theft of public assets (wild animals are considered national property), and threats to biodiversity.
4. Key Principles
Possession of weapons or traps with intent to poach is punishable.
Endangered species hunting carries higher penalties.
Protected areas (national parks, conservation areas) have stricter enforcement.
Confiscation of firearms, vehicles, and illegal catch is standard.
Investigations often involve wildlife officers, park rangers, and police.
Case Studies
Case 1: Arrest of Poachers in Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal, 2015)
Facts:
Two individuals were arrested for attempting to hunt Himalayan tahr within Sagarmatha National Park. They had firearms and snares in their possession.
Legal Issues:
Hunting in a protected area without a permit.
Possession of illegal weapons.
Decision:
Charged under NPWCA and Forest Act.
Court sentenced the accused to 3 years imprisonment and fined NPR 150,000.
Equipment (guns and traps) was confiscated.
Implications:
Demonstrates strict enforcement in high-altitude protected areas.
Highlights deterrence for poachers targeting Himalayan ungulates.
Case 2: Snow Leopard Poaching Attempt in Annapurna Conservation Area (Nepal, 2017)
Facts:
A group of poachers was caught with snares intended to capture snow leopards near Muktinath. They were locals employed by a foreign trader interested in animal pelts.
Legal Issues:
Snow leopard is fully protected under NPWCA.
Poaching endangered species is an aggravated offence.
Decision:
Arrested and prosecuted under NPWCA.
One poacher received 7 years imprisonment; others received 5 years.
Court confiscated all traps and vehicles.
Implications:
Illustrates that involvement of organized networks increases penalties.
Shows courts’ recognition of the endangered species’ ecological importance.
Case 3: Illegal Hunting of Red Panda in Langtang National Park (Nepal, 2018)
Facts:
A local hunter was caught with a red panda carcass in Langtang National Park. The red panda is fully protected and critically endangered.
Legal Issues:
Hunting endangered species and illegal possession.
Entry into a national park without permit.
Decision:
Sentenced to 10 years imprisonment, highest penalty for local poaching recorded at the time.
Fine of NPR 300,000 imposed.
Equipment confiscated; the carcass sent for scientific study.
Implications:
Shows that prosecution can reach maximum statutory limits for critical species.
Reinforces Nepal’s commitment to protecting Himalayan biodiversity.
Case 4: Tiger Poaching Ring in Chitwan National Park (Nepal, 2016)
Facts:
Although not strictly Himalayan, this case involved poachers from Himalayan foothills attempting to smuggle tiger skins through the region to India. They were arrested at the park boundary.
Legal Issues:
Illegal hunting and smuggling of endangered species across borders.
Violation of NPWCA and international CITES provisions.
Decision:
Sentenced under NPWCA and relevant penal provisions.
Imprisonment: 8–12 years, fines of NPR 500,000.
International cooperation used to investigate trafficking networks.
Implications:
Highlights cross-border dimension of wildlife crime.
Shows that poachers targeting Himalayan regions may be linked to broader trafficking networks.
Case 5: Arrest of Yak Poachers in Mustang Region (Nepal, 2019)
Facts:
Two individuals were caught illegally hunting wild yaks for meat and trade. They were operating near restricted conservation areas in Mustang district.
Legal Issues:
Hunting livestock in protected grazing areas is prohibited.
Unauthorized killing of wild animals and potential disturbance to local ecosystem.
Decision:
Charged under NPWCA and Forest Act.
Sentenced to 3 years imprisonment and fined NPR 100,000.
Confiscation of firearms and vehicle.
Implications:
Enforcement extends to community grazing areas as well.
Even non-endangered Himalayan species receive legal protection in conservation zones.
Case 6: Arrest of Foreign Poacher in Kanchenjunga Conservation Area (Nepal, 2020)
Facts:
A foreign tourist was caught attempting to hunt Himalayan musk deer for its valuable scent glands. He had firearms and bait.
Legal Issues:
Hunting endangered species by a foreign national.
International trafficking risk under CITES.
Decision:
Prosecuted under NPWCA and Forest Act.
Sentenced to 12 years imprisonment due to transnational dimension and endangered species involvement.
Confiscation of all equipment and initiation of international legal cooperation.
Implications:
Shows that Nepal prosecutes foreign poachers aggressively.
Demonstrates deterrence for transnational wildlife crime.
Key Takeaways
Strict Legal Protection:
Endangered Himalayan species (snow leopard, red panda, Himalayan tahr) are fully protected.
Penalties Are Severe:
Imprisonment can range from 3 to 12 years; fines up to NPR 500,000.
Equipment and vehicles are routinely confiscated.
National Parks and Conservation Areas Are Priority Zones:
Poaching in protected areas triggers higher enforcement and penalties.
Aggravating Factors:
Organized groups, endangered species, foreign involvement, or cross-border smuggling increase punishment severity.
Judicial Precedents:
Courts consistently apply NPWCA and Forest Act provisions, reinforcing national commitment to Himalayan wildlife protection.
RELATED Blog
comments