Prosecution Of Trafficking In Wild Animal Parts
🔹 1. Legal Framework for Wildlife Trafficking Prosecution
International Laws and Conventions
CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) – An international treaty that regulates trade in endangered species and imposes penalties for trafficking.
UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) – Provides frameworks for law enforcement coordination in transnational wildlife crime.
Interpol – Operates global databases and supports investigations into illegal wildlife trade.
National Laws
United States
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Lacey Act (16 U.S.C. § 3372) – Prohibits the trade of wildlife, fish, and plants taken in violation of U.S. or foreign laws.
Wildlife Crime Control Act of 1973 – Focuses on trafficking and provides penalties for violations.
China
Wildlife Protection Law of the People's Republic of China (updated in 2016) – Prohibits the illegal trade in wildlife and their parts.
Criminal Law of the PRC – Articles relating to the illegal possession, sale, and trafficking of wildlife products.
India
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 – Prohibits the hunting, trade, and transport of endangered species.
Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Sections covering theft, smuggling, and cruelty to animals can be applied in wildlife trafficking cases.
European Union
EU Wildlife Trade Regulation (EC) No 338/97 – Implements CITES at the EU level, allowing prosecution of wildlife trafficking.
Penalties for Wildlife Trafficking
Fines ranging from thousands to millions of dollars, depending on the severity of the offense.
Imprisonment ranging from a few years to life in extreme cases of trafficking.
Seizure and forfeiture of goods related to the illegal trade.
🔹 2. Key Legal Issues in Trafficking Prosecution
Cross-border Jurisdiction: Many trafficking cases involve transnational networks, meaning prosecutors often need international cooperation.
Intent and Knowledge: Criminal prosecution often hinges on proving intent or knowledge of the illegal nature of trade.
Defendants: Both individual traffickers and organized criminal networks can be prosecuted. In some cases, legitimate businesses (e.g., antique dealers) may be involved unknowingly.
🔹 3. Case Studies
Here are five key cases where trafficking in wild animal parts was prosecuted, highlighting the legal principles and outcomes.
Case 1: United States v. Kenneth D. Sisson (2017)
Facts:
Kenneth Sisson operated an illegal ivory trafficking ring that smuggled elephant tusks into the United States from Africa. He utilized the Lacey Act to falsely declare ivory as non-wildlife products and sold them to collectors and dealers.
Legal Issues:
Violation of the Lacey Act, illegal possession and transportation of wildlife parts.
Violating CITES provisions regarding the trade of ivory.
Prosecution:
Sisson’s trafficking activities were discovered after a sting operation in which undercover agents bought ivory from his network.
Evidence included intercepted communications and illegal ivory seizures.
Judgment:
Sisson was convicted and sentenced to 33 months in prison.
The operation led to the confiscation of over 2,000 pounds of ivory and the destruction of illegal wildlife products.
Significance:
The case demonstrated the reach of the Lacey Act in prosecuting international wildlife trafficking and showed how covert operations can reveal complex illegal trade networks.
Case 2: China – Pangolin Scale Trafficking Ring (2018)
Facts:
Chinese authorities dismantled a pangolin scale trafficking ring that smuggled tonnes of scales from Africa to be sold in Chinese markets. Pangolins are critically endangered, and their scales are used in traditional medicine and luxury goods.
Legal Issues:
Violating China’s Wildlife Protection Law, which prohibits trafficking in protected species.
Organized crime statutes were invoked due to the scale of the trafficking operation.
Prosecution:
The operation was uncovered after months of surveillance on shipments of pangolin scales, with assistance from Interpol and CITES.
Multiple arrests were made, including importers, exporters, and middlemen in Africa and China.
Judgment:
11 individuals were convicted.
Sentences ranged from 5 to 12 years in prison.
The court also imposed substantial fines and seized assets connected to the illegal trade.
Significance:
Illustrates the coordination between international agencies and national law enforcement, as well as the use of organized crime statutes in prosecuting large trafficking rings.
Case 3: India – Smuggling of Rhino Horns (2013)
Facts:
A smuggling network was caught trafficking rhino horns from Kaziranga National Park to various countries, including China and Nepal. The horns were poached from Indian rhinoceroses, a species protected under Indian law.
Legal Issues:
Violation of the Wildlife Protection Act (1972) of India.
The criminal conspiracy involved theft, smuggling, and international trafficking.
Prosecution:
The authorities conducted a series of raids, recovering numerous rhino horns and arresting individuals from different regions of India and neighboring countries.
The prosecution relied on wiretap evidence, financial transactions linking smugglers, and physical evidence of the horns.
Judgment:
The ringleaders were sentenced to life imprisonment.
Several other individuals received sentences of 5 to 10 years.
The court ordered the forfeiture of the proceeds derived from the sale of the horns.
Significance:
This case highlights the seriousness of wildlife trafficking offenses and the international reach of such crimes, especially regarding species like rhinos, which are often targeted by highly organized criminal networks.
Case 4: Thailand – Tiger Bone and Skin Smuggling (2015)
Facts:
Thai authorities uncovered a trafficking ring that was smuggling tiger bones, skins, and other body parts to markets in China and Southeast Asia. The network was involved in the illegal breeding of tigers and the slaughtering of these animals for their parts.
Legal Issues:
Violations of Thailand’s Wildlife Protection Act and CITES regulations.
The case involved both poaching and illegal breeding.
Prosecution:
A multi-jurisdictional investigation was launched with input from CITES and Interpol. Evidence included surveillance footage, seized tiger body parts, and undercover purchases.
Authorities tracked down the ring’s operations and found that tiger bones were sold for use in traditional medicine.
Judgment:
Several individuals, including the ring leaders, were convicted under Thai law.
The leader received a 12-year sentence, and other members were given sentences ranging from 4 to 8 years.
The court also ordered the closure of illegal tiger breeding facilities.
Significance:
Demonstrates how illegal breeding operations can be linked to wildlife trafficking and highlights the serious consequences for individuals involved in smuggling protected species.
Case 5: United States – Operation Crash (2019)
Facts:
This was a multi-year international operation led by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) targeting a rhinoceros horn trafficking network. The operation investigated criminal groups smuggling rhino horns from Africa to the U.S., often hidden within commercial shipments.
Legal Issues:
Violations of the Endangered Species Act and the Lacey Act.
Wire fraud and smuggling charges were brought against the traffickers involved.
Prosecution:
After tracking shipments and intercepting containers, U.S. authorities seized large amounts of rhino horns and arrested individuals from various parts of the U.S. and Africa.
Investigators used undercover agents and surveillance techniques to infiltrate the network and gather evidence.
Judgment:
Several key figures were convicted, and the operation led to the seizure of nearly $10 million worth of rhino horns.
Convictions included lengthy prison sentences, with some traffickers receiving 10–15 years in prison.
Significance:
Operation Crash is a prime example of international cooperation and how complex, transnational wildlife trafficking can be prosecuted successfully with the right resources and partnerships.
🔹 4. Key Takeaways
Transnational Coordination: Wildlife trafficking is often a cross-border crime, requiring international cooperation (e.g., Interpol, CITES).
Organized Crime Focus: Prosecuting organized criminal syndicates is crucial, as wildlife trafficking often involves large, well-coordinated networks.
Severe Penalties: Criminal liability for wildlife trafficking can result in lengthy prison sentences, fines, and asset forfeiture.
Poaching and Smuggling: Prosecutions often target both poaching (illegal killing of animals) and smuggling (illegal trade of animal parts).
International Frameworks: Laws like CITES and UNODC frameworks are key in supporting global enforcement efforts.
RELATED Blog
comments