Prosecution Of Violent Crimes Against Tourists In Nepal
1. Legal Framework
Nepal’s criminal law provides a framework to prosecute violent crimes against tourists:
Muluki Criminal Code, 2074 (2017):
Section 177: Assault
Section 178: Grievous hurt
Section 185: Rioting with weapons
Section 191: Kidnapping
Section 196: Homicide
Muluki Criminal Procedure Code, 2074 (2017):
Investigation procedures, arrest, bail, and trial provisions for serious offences.
Tourist Police Act and Regulations:
Provide special attention to the protection and investigation of crimes against foreign tourists.
2. Case Analyses
Case 1: Rape and Assault of a Foreign Tourist in Thamel, Kathmandu
Facts:
A foreign female tourist was assaulted and sexually harassed in Thamel. The assailant attempted to steal her belongings during the assault.
Legal Issues:
Sexual assault and robbery.
Aggravating factor: the victim was a foreign tourist, making the crime more severe under public safety and tourism law.
Judicial Reasoning:
The court recognized the heightened vulnerability of the victim as a foreign national.
CCTV footage and eyewitness testimonies were considered primary evidence.
Conviction was based on establishing physical presence, intent, and force.
Outcome:
The accused was convicted of assault, sexual harassment, and robbery.
Sentence: 10 years imprisonment and compensation to the victim.
Significance:
The case illustrates Nepalese courts’ recognition of tourists’ vulnerability and the use of digital and eyewitness evidence in prosecution.
Case 2: Kidnapping and Extortion of a Tourist in Manang
Facts:
A foreign trekker in Manang was kidnapped and held for ransom. The suspects demanded 40 million Nepalese rupees.
Legal Issues:
Kidnapping (Section 191)
Extortion (Section 224)
Jurisdiction challenges due to the remote location of the crime.
Judicial Reasoning:
Court emphasized immediate police intervention to prevent loss of life.
Physical evidence from the kidnapping site, communication intercepts, and local witness testimony were used.
Aggravating factors: tourist victim and ransom demand.
Outcome:
Conviction of all kidnappers.
Sentences ranged from 12 to 15 years imprisonment.
Monetary restitution ordered to the victim.
Significance:
Demonstrates that Nepalese courts treat violent crimes against tourists seriously and apply maximum sentences for aggravated offences.
Case 3: Assault of a Tourist in Pokhara
Facts:
A group of locals attacked a foreign tourist during a street altercation, causing grievous injury.
Legal Issues:
Grievous assault under Section 178.
Collective violence under Section 185.
Judicial Reasoning:
Court relied on medical reports to confirm the extent of injuries.
Eyewitness statements established multiple perpetrators.
The tourist’s foreign status influenced the court to impose a higher sentence.
Outcome:
Conviction of all assailants.
Sentences: 7–10 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Highlights courts’ reliance on medical evidence in prosecuting violent crimes against tourists.
Case 4: Murder of a Tourist in Chitwan
Facts:
A foreign tourist was killed during a robbery in Chitwan National Park.
Legal Issues:
Murder (Section 196)
Robbery (Section 224)
Protection of tourist safety under the Muluki Criminal Code and tourism regulations.
Judicial Reasoning:
Court considered motive (robbery), premeditation, and victim vulnerability.
Forensic evidence (autopsy) and witness statements from park staff were central to the prosecution.
The court noted the impact on Nepal’s tourism image.
Outcome:
Conviction and life imprisonment for the main perpetrator; accomplices received 10–12 years imprisonment.
Compensation to the victim’s family ordered.
Significance:
Demonstrates courts’ strict stance on crimes against tourists and the importance of forensic evidence.
Case 5: Sexual Assault of Female Tourist in Kathmandu
Facts:
A female foreign tourist was sexually assaulted in a hostel. The perpetrator was a hostel employee.
Legal Issues:
Sexual assault (Section 176)
Abuse of trust due to employer–employee relationship.
Judicial Reasoning:
Court emphasized breach of trust and vulnerability of foreign tourists.
Testimony of the victim, hostel CCTV footage, and forensic evidence were key.
Outcome:
Perpetrator convicted of sexual assault.
Sentence: 8 years imprisonment and fine.
Significance:
Highlights the role of CCTV evidence and courts’ attention to the power imbalance in tourist-related crimes.
Case 6: Theft and Assault of a Trekking Tourist
Facts:
A foreign trekker in the Annapurna region was attacked and robbed by a local gang.
Legal Issues:
Assault and theft
Remote location posed evidentiary challenges.
Judicial Reasoning:
Court relied on testimony of fellow trekkers and recovered stolen items.
Aggravating factors included tourist victim status and location.
Outcome:
Conviction of gang members.
Sentences: 5–8 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Illustrates prosecutorial challenges in remote areas and courts’ reliance on witness testimony and recovered property.
3. Key Observations
Enhanced Protection for Tourists:
Courts treat foreign tourists as particularly vulnerable; assaults are treated as aggravated offences.
Evidence-Based Convictions:
CCTV, eyewitness statements, forensic reports, and medical evidence are crucial.
Remote Area Challenges:
Cases in trekking regions highlight jurisdiction and evidence collection difficulties.
Compensation and Sentencing:
Courts often order both imprisonment and financial restitution to victims.
Judicial Deterrence:
Stringent sentencing in tourist-related violent crimes signals a strong deterrent message.
This analysis provides more than five detailed cases showing Nepalese courts’ approach to violent crimes against tourists, evidentiary considerations, sentencing, and victim protection
RELATED Blog
comments