Public Order Crimes Under Bahraini Law
I. Concept of Public Order (النظام العام) in Bahraini Law
In Bahraini criminal jurisprudence, public order refers to the essential legal, moral, religious, and social foundations upon which society is built. These include:
Public tranquility and security
Respect for religion and morals
Authority of the state and its institutions
Social harmony and collective values
Public order crimes are mainly regulated by:
Bahraini Penal Code (Decree Law No. 15 of 1976)
Supplementary security and press laws
These crimes are treated as serious offenses because they threaten society as a whole, not merely individual victims.
II. Main Categories of Public Order Crimes
1. Crimes Against Public Peace and Tranquility
Unlawful assembly
Rioting
Incitement to violence
Disturbance of public peace
2. Crimes Affecting Public Morals
Public indecency
Dissemination of immoral materials
Acts offending public modesty
3. Crimes Against Religion
Insulting religious symbols
Blasphemy
Desecration of places of worship
4. Crimes Undermining State Authority
Insulting public institutions
Inciting hatred against the regime
Spreading false news that harms public confidence
Case 1: Unlawful Assembly and Threat to Public Order
Facts:
A group gathered in a public street without official permission and chanted slogans causing traffic obstruction and public fear.
Legal Issue:
Does peaceful intent negate criminal liability?
Court’s Reasoning:
The Court of Cassation held that intent to disturb public order is inferred from conduct, not declared intention. Blocking roads and creating fear suffices.
Principle Established:
Unlicensed assembly becomes a public order crime when it objectively disrupts public peace, regardless of political or social motive.
Case 2: Dissemination of False Information Harmful to Public Order
Facts:
The accused circulated rumors through social media alleging imminent violence, causing public panic.
Defense Argument:
No actual violence occurred; therefore, no crime.
Court’s Reasoning:
The court ruled that actual harm is not required; the likelihood of disturbing public tranquility is sufficient.
Principle Established:
Spreading false news constitutes a public order crime when it is capable of creating fear or instability, even without material consequences.
Case 3: Public Indecency in a Public Place
Facts:
The accused engaged in inappropriate conduct in a shopping area visible to the public.
Legal Issue:
Is personal freedom a defense?
Court’s Reasoning:
The court emphasized that personal freedom ends where public morality begins.
Principle Established:
Public indecency is assessed according to prevailing societal values, not the personal beliefs of the accused.
Case 4: Insulting Religion and Public Order
Facts:
An individual publicly mocked religious rituals during a gathering.
Defense Argument:
Freedom of expression.
Court’s Reasoning:
The Court of Cassation held that freedom of expression is not absolute and must respect religious harmony.
Principle Established:
Any expression that undermines religious respect and threatens societal cohesion constitutes a public order offense.
Case 5: Insulting a Public Institution
Facts:
The accused verbally attacked a government authority during a public event.
Legal Issue:
Is criticism criminal?
Court’s Reasoning:
The court distinguished between constructive criticism and criminal insult.
Principle Established:
Statements that undermine public confidence in state institutions exceed lawful criticism and fall under public order crimes.
Case 6: Rioting and Collective Criminal Intent
Facts:
A crowd engaged in property destruction during a protest.
Legal Issue:
Can individual liability exist without direct action?
Court’s Reasoning:
The court applied the doctrine of collective criminal intent.
Principle Established:
Participation in a riot establishes criminal liability even if the accused did not personally commit destructive acts.
IV. Key Legal Characteristics of Public Order Crimes
Broad judicial discretion in assessing danger to society
Preventive nature — harm need not fully occur
Collective interest prevails over individual freedoms
Intent inferred from circumstances
V. Conclusion
Public order crimes under Bahraini law reflect a protective and preventive criminal policy. Bahraini courts consistently prioritize:
Social stability
Religious respect
Institutional authority
Case law shows a clear judicial trend toward objective assessment of conduct, not subjective intent, when public order is at stake.
RELATED Blog
comments