1. Introduction

Salt-tolerant genetically modified (GM) crops are agricultural plants whose genetic material has been modified to improve their ability to survive and produce yields in saline soils or irrigation water.

These crops are particularly relevant to Morocco because agricultural production faces challenges associated with:

Soil salinisation and declining soil fertility.

Water scarcity and the use of saline irrigation water.

Climate change and desertification.

Declining agricultural productivity in vulnerable regions.

The need to develop drought- and salt-resistant crop varieties.

Examples of potential salt-tolerant genetically modified crops include wheat, barley, rice, tomatoes and other crops engineered to regulate sodium absorption, improve potassium retention or increase cellular tolerance to salt stress.

However, the development and commercialisation of such crops raise important legal questions concerning environmental protection, food safety, agricultural biodiversity, intellectual property, biosafety and farmers' rights.

The central legal issue in Morocco is whether a genetically modified salt-tolerant crop can lawfully move from laboratory research to experimental field trials, importation, cultivation and commercial distribution. These stages must be distinguished because approval for scientific research does not automatically authorise commercial cultivation.

2. Legal and regulatory framework in Morocco

Morocco's regulatory position requires particular attention: it is a party to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, but its domestic legislation has not established a comprehensive, dedicated approval procedure for living modified organisms (LMOs).

The principal legal instruments are as follows.

A. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 2000

Morocco ratified the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety on 25 April 2011. It entered into force for Morocco on 24 July 2011.

United Nations Treaty Collection+1

The Protocol is particularly important for salt-tolerant genetically modified crops.

Its principal requirements include:

Article 1: Protection against potential adverse effects of living modified organisms.

Article 2: Adoption of appropriate legal, administrative and institutional measures.

Article 7: Application of the advance informed agreement procedure to specified transboundary movements.

Article 10: Risk assessment and decisions concerning imports.

Article 15: Scientific risk assessment.

Article 16: Risk management and monitoring.

Article 17: Measures concerning unintentional transboundary movements.

Article 18: Identification, documentation and handling requirements.

Article 23: Public awareness and participation.

For example, if a Moroccan biotechnology company develops salt-tolerant genetically modified wheat and intends to export viable seeds to another country, the applicable transboundary biosafety requirements must be considered.

Legal significance: Morocco's treaty obligations provide a framework for biosafety governance, but they should not be confused with a fully operational domestic crop-approval licensing system.

B. Circular of 11 August 1999

A significant administrative measure is the Ministry of Agriculture's circular dated 11 August 1999.

Morocco's biodiversity authorities describe this circular as prohibiting the introduction of products and food preparations containing products derived from LMOs and restricting the importation of LMO seeds.

The historical national reporting also states that experimental field cultivation, commercial cultivation and certain forms of GMO research were not authorised under the regulatory position described in that report.

Morocco+1

This creates an important distinction:

Conventional salt-tolerant crop breeding is not automatically prohibited as genetic modification.

Genetically modified seed imports cannot be treated as ordinary seed imports.

Permission for conventional agricultural research does not establish permission for GMO field trials.

Commercial cultivation cannot be presumed lawful merely because a crop has agricultural or environmental benefits.

The current legal status of this circular and any subsequent administrative amendments should be confirmed with the competent Moroccan authorities before a project is undertaken.

C. Law No. 11-03 on Environmental Protection

Law No. 11-03, promulgated in 2003, establishes general environmental protection principles.

It addresses:

Protection of natural resources.

Conservation of biodiversity.

Prevention of environmental pollution.

Protection of soil and water resources.

Environmental responsibility and compensation for environmental harm.

These principles are relevant where salt-tolerant GM crops could affect surrounding ecosystems, local plant populations or agricultural land.

FAO Legal Database (FAOLEX)+1

For example, the unintended spread of modified genetic material into neighbouring conventional crops could raise questions about environmental damage, responsibility and compensation.

D. Law No. 12-03 and Law No. 49-17 on Environmental Assessment

Morocco adopted Law No. 12-03 on Environmental Impact Studies in 2003. Law No. 49-17 on Environmental Assessment was subsequently promulgated in 2020 and published in 2022.

The environmental assessment framework provides mechanisms for evaluating projects with potentially significant environmental effects.

environnement.gov.ma+1

For a proposed large-scale agricultural biotechnology project, relevant questions include:

Could modified plants spread beyond the experimental site?

Could they cross-pollinate with conventional or wild relatives?

Could they affect soil microorganisms?

Could their cultivation change local biodiversity?

Could long-term cultivation affect soil and water management?

An environmental assessment should not be confused with a GMO-specific approval. The applicable assessment requirements depend on the project and the legislation in force.

E. National Biosafety Committee

Morocco established a National Biosafety Committee through Circular No. 5/2005 of 12 April 2005.

The committee was designed to bring together representatives of relevant government departments, private-sector stakeholders and civil society organisations.

The National Food Safety Office (ONSSA) has also been designated as Morocco's competent national authority for the administrative functions associated with implementation of the Cartagena Protocol, working with other biosafety stakeholders.

Morocco+1

This institutional structure is relevant to risk assessment, administrative coordination and biosafety policy.

3. Institutional authorities responsible for regulation

A proposed salt-tolerant GM crop should not be treated as approved simply because one government institution has reviewed its scientific merits. The relevant administrative and environmental requirements must be considered together.

4. Scientific and legal assessment of salt-tolerant genetic modification

The regulatory assessment should examine the particular genetic modification rather than treating all salt-tolerant crops as presenting identical risks.

For example, genetic modifications may aim to:

Improve sodium exclusion from plant tissues.

Increase potassium retention.

Regulate salt-stress signalling pathways.

Improve osmotic adjustment.

Strengthen cellular protection against oxidative stress.

Full article: Development of transgenic wheat plants withstand salt stress via the MDAR1 gene

Building tomorrow’s food system: how agri-biotech innovators use IP strategically

Frontiers | Bread Wheat With High Salinity and Sodicity Tolerance

10

The legal assessment should consider the following factors.

1. Genetic stability

Researchers should establish whether the introduced genetic characteristics remain stable across generations.

2. Gene flow

The possibility of modified genes spreading through pollen, seeds or other biological mechanisms should be examined.

3. Non-target organisms

The assessment should investigate possible effects on pollinators, soil microorganisms and other organisms.

4. Food and feed safety

Where the crop is intended for human consumption or animal feed, relevant nutritional, toxicological and allergenicity questions should be addressed.

5. Agricultural performance

The applicant should demonstrate that salt tolerance does not create unacceptable adverse characteristics, such as reduced nutritional quality or increased weediness.

6. Long-term environmental effects

The applicant should consider whether repeated cultivation could affect biodiversity, soil composition and agricultural ecosystems.

The Cartagena Protocol's risk-assessment and risk-management provisions are particularly relevant to these questions.

Biosafety Clearing-House+1

5. Approval procedure for salt-tolerant GM crops

A proposed approval system should distinguish between research, confined testing, environmental release and commercial cultivation.

Proposed regulatory pathway

Scientific development

Identify the genetic modification and demonstrate its intended salt-tolerance characteristics.

Institutional and regulatory consultation

Consult ONSSA, relevant agricultural authorities and biosafety institutions.

Biosafety risk assessment

Examine genetic stability, gene flow, toxicity, allergenicity and environmental effects.

Confined research

Obtain any legally required permissions before conducting work involving living modified organisms.

Experimental field release

Seek specific legal authorisation before deliberate environmental release. A research licence alone should not be assumed sufficient.

Commercial approval

Establish the applicable import, seed, food/feed and environmental permissions before marketing or cultivation.

Post-release monitoring

Monitor gene flow, environmental effects, crop performance and potential adverse incidents.

This is a proposed compliance pathway, not a representation that Morocco currently operates a dedicated GMO approval procedure.

6. Risk assessment and precautionary principle

The precautionary principle is particularly important where scientific evidence is incomplete.

Morocco's biodiversity authorities describe the national biosafety approach as favouring non-authorisation of LMOs until their potential harmful effects on human health and the environment have been adequately addressed.

Morocco+1

In salt-tolerant crop development, precautionary assessment should cover:

Environmental risks

Uncontrolled propagation of genetically modified plants.

Cross-pollination with traditional crop varieties.

Genetic contamination of neighbouring farms.

Changes to local ecological relationships.

Possible effects on biodiversity.

Human health risks

Unexpected allergenic properties.

Changes in nutritional composition.

Toxicological effects of newly expressed proteins.

Potential consequences of consuming modified agricultural products.

Agricultural risks

Dependence on patented seeds.

Increased costs for small-scale farmers.

Reduced availability of traditional seed varieties.

Possible disruption of organic and conventional production.

Importantly, salt tolerance does not automatically establish environmental safety. A crop may perform well under saline conditions while still presenting separate ecological or food-safety questions.

7. Intellectual property and farmers' rights

Genetic modification may also generate intellectual property disputes.

Relevant Moroccan legislation includes:

Law No. 17-97 concerning industrial property, as amended.

Law No. 9-94 concerning the protection of plant varieties.

Applicable seed production, certification and marketing requirements.

A biotechnology company may seek patent protection for a qualifying genetic invention or plant-related technology, subject to the statutory exclusions and requirements.

Plant variety protection may also become relevant where a new salt-tolerant variety satisfies the legal conditions.

Potential disputes include:

Ownership of genetically modified seed technology.

Licensing agreements between research institutions and agricultural companies.

Farmers' use and saving of protected seeds.

Accidental presence of patented genetic material in neighbouring crops.

Access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing.

Morocco's ratification of the Cartagena Protocol should also be considered alongside applicable biodiversity and genetic-resource obligations.

8. Monitoring, traceability and liability

A functioning regulatory system should require traceability throughout the production and distribution chain.

Relevant compliance measures include:

Identification of genetically modified seed batches.

Documentation of genetic modification events.

Records of importation and distribution.

Monitoring of experimental locations.

Appropriate separation and containment measures.

Reporting of unexpected environmental effects.

Procedures for withdrawal or containment where necessary.

Law No. 11-03 is relevant to environmental responsibility and compensation for environmental harm.

FAO Legal Database (FAOLEX)

For example, if a salt-tolerant GM wheat variety spreads unintentionally to neighbouring conventional farms, potential legal issues could include:

Whether the operator breached an applicable legal duty.

Whether negligence or another basis of liability can be established.

Whether actual environmental or economic damage occurred.

Whether causation between the genetic modification and the damage can be demonstrated.

Whether compensation or remedial measures are available.

A distinction must be maintained between an accidental genetic presence and legally established damage. They are not necessarily equivalent.

9. Relevant case laws and judicial decisions

There appears to be no readily identifiable reported Moroccan judgment specifically addressing approval of salt-tolerant genetically modified crops. Consequently, the following foreign decisions are comparative authorities. They are not binding precedents in Morocco, but offer useful principles for interpreting biosafety, environmental protection and agricultural regulation.

Case 1: Confédération paysanne and Others v Premier ministre (2018)

Court: Court of Justice of the European Union.

Case number: C-528/16.

Decision date: 25 July 2018.

Subject: Genetic modification through mutagenesis.

Facts: Agricultural organisations challenged the treatment of certain genetically modified plants produced through newer mutagenesis techniques.

Judgment: The Court held that organisms obtained through mutagenesis techniques are generally GMOs under the relevant EU legislation. It distinguished techniques with a history of conventional use and an established safety record from newer techniques.

Relevance to Morocco: The case illustrates why regulatory authorities should examine the actual genetic modification technique rather than relying solely on the crop's intended agricultural benefit.

For example, a salt-tolerant wheat variety produced through a new genome-editing technique may require a different legal assessment from a conventionally bred salt-tolerant variety.

EUR-Lex+1

Case 2: Pioneer Hi Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole (2012)

Court: Court of Justice of the European Union.

Case number: C-36/11.

Decision date: 6 September 2012.

Subject: Cultivation of authorised genetically modified crops.

Facts: Pioneer Hi Bred challenged restrictions on cultivating genetically modified maize varieties that had already received relevant European authorisations.

Judgment: The Court held that a Member State could not impose an additional national cultivation authorisation procedure in circumstances where the relevant EU authorisations and catalogue requirements had already been satisfied.

It also considered the limits of national restrictions imposed pending coexistence measures.

Relevance to Morocco: The judgment demonstrates the importance of clearly distinguishing between approval of a crop, authorisation of its cultivation and measures intended to prevent contamination of conventional crops.

Morocco would need its own legally defined authorisation procedures rather than relying on foreign approval decisions as automatic permission to cultivate.

EUR-Lex+1

Case 3: Karl Heinz Bablok and Others v Freistaat Bayern (2011)

Court: Court of Justice of the European Union.

Case number: C-442/09.

Decision date: 6 September 2011.

Subject: Genetically modified pollen in honey.

Facts: Honey producers challenged the presence of pollen originating from genetically modified maize in their honey.

Judgment: The Court examined the distinction between pollen that remained an organism and food containing ingredients produced from GMOs. It held that the relevant food authorisation requirements could apply even where the presence of the GM-derived substance was accidental.

Relevance to Morocco: This case is particularly important for agricultural coexistence.

If pollen from salt-tolerant GM crops enters neighbouring conventional agricultural production, questions may arise concerning food regulation, traceability, marketing and responsibility.

EUR-Lex+1

10. Major legal challenges in Morocco

11. Recommendations for strengthening Moroccan legislation

Morocco could strengthen its regulatory framework through the following reforms.

1. Introduce dedicated GMO legislation

A comprehensive law should establish procedures for research, confined use, field trials, environmental release, importation and commercial cultivation.

2. Establish a formal crop-approval mechanism

Each application should identify the genetic modification, intended use, environmental conditions and proposed geographical cultivation area.

3. Strengthen independent scientific assessment

Risk assessment should involve qualified experts in plant genetics, toxicology, ecology, agronomy and food safety.

4. Introduce mandatory monitoring

Approved crops should be subject to appropriate post-release monitoring and reporting obligations.

5. Protect conventional farmers

Rules should address coexistence, accidental contamination, traceability and access to appropriate remedies.

6. Improve transparency

Applicants should provide relevant non-confidential safety information, while authorities should establish meaningful opportunities for public participation.

7. Establish clear liability rules

Legislation should identify the responsibilities of developers, importers, seed distributors and cultivation operators where legally established environmental or economic harm occurs.

12. Conclusion

The regulation of salt-tolerant crop genetic modification approval in Morocco involves the intersection of biotechnology, environmental law, agricultural regulation, food safety and intellectual property.

Morocco's ratification of the Cartagena Protocol provides an international biosafety framework. Its environmental legislation, including Laws No. 11-03, 12-03 and 49-17, also provides relevant environmental safeguards.

However, the absence of a comprehensive, dedicated domestic GMO approval framework remains an important regulatory issue. Morocco's historical administrative restrictions, particularly the circular of 11 August 1999, must also be considered when assessing whether particular research, importation or cultivation activities are permissible.

The central legal principle is that agricultural productivity and salt resistance cannot replace independent scientific assessment and lawful regulatory authorisation.

A comprehensive regulatory system should therefore balance scientific innovation, food safety, environmental protection, biodiversity conservation and farmers' economic interests.

13. Important legal references and research sources

Cartagena Protocol – Morocco Country Profile.

Morocco Biodiversity – Legislative and Administrative Biosafety Measures.

Morocco – Key Steps Towards Cartagena Protocol Implementation.

Moroccan Law No. 49-17 and Environmental Assessment Legislation.

FAOLEX – Moroccan Law No. 11-03.

Confédération paysanne – C-528/16.

Pioneer Hi Bred Italia – C-36/11.

Bablok – C-442/09.

Legal research qualification: The comparative judgments above are not Moroccan precedents. The domestic legal position should be verified against the latest Official Bulletin, administrative circulars and ONSSA requirements before relying on it for an actual approval application.