Research On Ai-Assisted Money Laundering Through Decentralized Finance (Defi) Platforms
Case 1: Tornado Cash – U.S. and Netherlands Prosecutions
Facts:
Tornado Cash is a crypto mixer, a smart contract platform that anonymizes cryptocurrency transactions by pooling deposits and redistributing them to different wallets, breaking the trace of origin.
In 2023, U.S. authorities charged two co-founders with conspiracy to commit money laundering and violating sanctions, alleging the platform was used to launder over $1 billion in illicit funds, including funds from North Korean hackers.
In the Netherlands, one developer was convicted for facilitating laundering of over $1 billion.
Methods of Laundering:
Users deposited illicit crypto into Tornado Cash.
The smart contract automatically mixed the deposits, then allowed withdrawals to new wallets, concealing the origin.
The decentralized nature meant the operators had no KYC procedures, making detection difficult.
Legal Outcome:
U.S. DOJ pursued criminal charges against the operators.
Dutch courts sentenced the developer to prison.
The case raised questions about liability for developers of decentralized protocols.
Key Insight:
Automated smart contracts can facilitate laundering on a massive scale.
Legal systems are starting to hold developers accountable even if the software operates autonomously.
Case 2: Ronin Bridge Hack (Axie Infinity) – 2022
Facts:
Hackers stole approximately $600 million in Ethereum and USDC from the Ronin Bridge, a cross-chain system for the Axie Infinity game.
The stolen funds were laundered through multiple DeFi protocols, including mixers and decentralized exchanges, before being partially converted to fiat.
Methods of Laundering:
The hackers split funds across thousands of wallets to avoid detection.
They used mixers to break the link between stolen and withdrawn funds.
Funds were converted through various tokens to obscure their trail.
Legal Outcome:
Investigations by U.S. and international agencies traced the flow, but prosecution is complex due to the decentralized, cross-border nature of the protocols.
Key Insight:
Large-scale hacks exploit DeFi infrastructure for instant money laundering.
Algorithmic or AI-assisted routing could make detection even harder.
Case 3: Spartan Protocol Exploit – 2021
Facts:
Attackers exploited a vulnerability in the Spartan Protocol, a DeFi platform, stealing over $30 million in SPARTA tokens.
The stolen tokens were laundered via multiple decentralized exchanges and cross-chain swaps to conceal their origin.
Methods of Laundering:
Use of automated smart contract exchanges to swap stolen tokens into other assets.
Movement across blockchains (“chain hopping”) to further obscure ownership.
Layering through multiple DeFi protocols.
Legal Outcome:
While individual attackers were not immediately identified due to pseudonymity, blockchain forensic firms traced much of the flow.
The case highlighted the regulatory challenge of prosecuting crimes executed entirely on decentralized platforms.
Key Insight:
DeFi vulnerabilities can serve as launchpads for laundering.
Automated flows in DeFi can function as a quasi-AI-assisted laundering method.
Case 4: Indian Enforcement Directorate Crypto Seizure – 2023
Facts:
Indian authorities seized over $200 million worth of cryptocurrency linked to a large-scale money laundering scheme involving a lending platform.
The operators used crypto wallets and pseudo-anonymous DeFi tools to layer and integrate illicit funds.
Methods of Laundering:
Breaking large sums into smaller transfers across multiple wallets.
Using lending protocols and wallet-to-wallet transfers to obscure the trail.
Potential use of bots or scripts to manage transactions, though not explicitly documented.
Legal Outcome:
The seizure represented one of the largest crypto asset recoveries in India under anti-money laundering laws.
Enforcement Directorate invoked the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) to freeze assets and pursue legal action.
Key Insight:
Even non-smart contract-based schemes leverage DeFi and crypto infrastructure for laundering.
AI or automated scripts could further enhance such schemes by optimizing transaction paths.
Summary of Insights Across Cases
Automation and decentralization enable laundering at unprecedented speed and scale.
Mixers and smart contracts remove traditional oversight and conceal the origin of funds.
Cross-chain and DeFi exchanges complicate detection and jurisdictional enforcement.
Legal precedents are emerging, holding developers and operators liable for protocol misuse.
AI potential: Even when not explicitly used, algorithmic systems could automate routing, splitting, and layering to evade detection.
RELATED Blog
comments