Research On Cybercrime Prosecution Involving Blockchain Tracing And Tracking
1. Ross Ulbricht – Silk Road (USA)
Facts:
Ulbricht ran Silk Road, a darknet marketplace for illegal drugs, using Bitcoin for transactions.
He was charged with narcotics trafficking, money laundering, and computer hacking.
Blockchain tracing aspect:
Authorities traced thousands of bitcoin transactions on the public ledger to wallets connected to Ulbricht.
Forensic analysis of his laptop confirmed ownership of wallets and control over Silk Road’s funds.
Outcome:
Convicted on all counts; sentenced to life imprisonment without parole.
Significance:
Demonstrated that Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous, and blockchain analytics can directly support criminal prosecutions.
2. Roman Sterlingov – Bitcoin Fog (USA)
Facts:
Sterlingov operated Bitcoin Fog, a cryptocurrency mixer that laundered large amounts of bitcoins from criminal activities.
Blockchain tracing aspect:
Investigators traced the flow of bitcoins into and out of the mixer.
They combined blockchain analytics with exchange KYC records to identify him as the operator.
Outcome:
Sentenced to over 12 years imprisonment and ordered to forfeit bitcoins involved.
Significance:
Showed that even sophisticated anonymization services (mixers) can be traced using blockchain analysis.
3. Welcome to Video (South Korea / USA)
Facts:
A darknet site hosting child sexual abuse material, accepting bitcoin payments.
Operator Jong Woo Son ran the site and hundreds of users worldwide were also charged.
Blockchain tracing aspect:
Payments were traced from user wallets to the site and eventually to Son’s control.
Combining on-chain tracing with off-chain data (exchange KYC, IP logs) identified both users and operator.
Outcome:
Operator convicted; massive seizure of content and arrests of hundreds of users.
Significance:
Highlighted blockchain tracing as a tool in prosecuting child exploitation and online crimes.
4. United States v. Gratkowski (USA)
Facts:
Involved bitcoin transactions in child pornography cases.
Blockchain tracing / legal aspect:
Addressed the Fourth Amendment implications of bitcoin transactions.
Court ruled that bitcoin transaction records resemble bank records and are not fully protected, allowing law enforcement access.
Outcome:
Set precedent on admissibility and expectation of privacy in cryptocurrency-related prosecutions.
Significance:
Legal framework for using blockchain evidence in court was clarified.
5. Mark Karpeles / Mt. Gox (Japan / International)
Facts:
Mt. Gox, once the world’s largest bitcoin exchange, collapsed after losing 850,000 BTC due to hacks.
Karpeles was charged with embezzlement and data manipulation.
Blockchain tracing aspect:
Investigators analyzed the blockchain to trace missing bitcoins and linked suspicious transfers to wallets controlled by Karpeles.
Blockchain analysis was used in forensic accounting to reconstruct fund flows and losses.
Outcome:
Convicted of falsifying financial records; received suspended prison term.
Victims’ compensation was partially based on tracking stolen bitcoins.
Significance:
Illustrated the use of blockchain analytics in corporate fraud and embezzlement involving cryptocurrency.
6. BitConnect Scam / Related Prosecutions (International)
Facts:
BitConnect was a cryptocurrency lending and exchange platform accused of operating a Ponzi scheme.
Operators raised billions of dollars from global investors.
Blockchain tracing aspect:
Blockchain analysis tracked investor deposits and withdrawals.
Law enforcement traced transfers to wallets controlled by operators, allowing asset freezing and seizure.
Outcome:
Operators were prosecuted in multiple jurisdictions; some sentenced to prison and ordered to repay investors.
Significance:
Demonstrates blockchain’s role in uncovering large-scale crypto fraud and tracking illicit gains.
7. Bitcoin Heist Case – Lazarus Group / North Korea (International)
Facts:
North Korean hackers associated with the Lazarus Group stole cryptocurrencies from exchanges worldwide.
Blockchain tracing aspect:
Forensic teams used blockchain analysis to trace stolen funds through multiple wallets, mixers, and exchanges.
Cluster analysis and transaction graph tracing helped map out the funds’ movement despite attempts to launder via mixers.
Outcome:
Funds recovered in small batches; international sanctions and law enforcement actions targeted known addresses.
Significance:
Shows blockchain tracing is effective even against state-sponsored cybercrime.
8. PlusToken Scam (China / International)
Facts:
PlusToken was a crypto Ponzi scheme promising high returns to investors.
Operators laundered over $2 billion in cryptocurrency.
Blockchain tracing aspect:
Blockchain analytics traced funds through multiple wallets and exchanges, linking the flow of stolen coins to key operators.
Allowed authorities to identify addresses and seize portions of stolen assets.
Outcome:
Chinese authorities arrested several operators; partial restitution to victims.
Significance:
Demonstrates the combination of blockchain forensics and international law enforcement collaboration.
Key Observations Across All Cases
Blockchain is traceable: Even when pseudonymous, transactions leave a public trail.
Combining on-chain and off-chain data is crucial: Wallets alone are insufficient; KYC, IP logs, and device seizures provide identity linkage.
Legal frameworks matter: Courts consider Fourth Amendment, admissibility, and jurisdictional issues.
Mixers and anonymizers are not foolproof: Advanced analytics can deanonymize even sophisticated laundering methods.
International collaboration is essential: Cryptocurrency crimes often span countries, requiring coordinated prosecution.
RELATED Blog
comments