Research On Labour Exploitation And Criminal Law In Nepal
Labour exploitation remains a significant issue in many countries, including Nepal, where workers—especially in the informal and migrant sectors—face harsh conditions, including forced labour, wage theft, unsafe working environments, and human trafficking. These forms of exploitation are exacerbated by the absence of strong enforcement mechanisms, lack of education about workers' rights, and weak legal protections in certain sectors.
In Nepal, labour laws are governed by the Labour Act, 2017, and various international conventions, including those of the International Labour Organization (ILO), which the country has ratified. Criminal law also addresses certain forms of labour exploitation, including human trafficking, forced labour, and bonded labour, which are criminalized under the Criminal Code of Nepal, 2017.
This article explores the issue of labour exploitation in Nepal, specifically how it intersects with criminal law, with a focus on case law that has helped shape the legal landscape around the prosecution of labour exploitation in Nepal.
Legal Framework for Labour Protection in Nepal
Labour Act, 2017: This is the principal legislation governing the relationship between employers and employees in Nepal. It ensures certain fundamental rights of workers, including protection against unfair dismissal, provision of minimum wages, and conditions for safe and healthy work environments.
Criminal Code, 2017: Sections related to human trafficking and forced labour in the Criminal Code criminalize various forms of exploitation in the labour market. The bonded labour and forced labour provisions under Section 294 of the Code are particularly relevant to addressing the exploitation of workers.
The Foreign Employment Act, 2007: This law regulates the migration of Nepali workers abroad and sets out guidelines for employment agencies and recruiters. It is designed to prevent human trafficking and forced labour in the context of international migration.
International Labour Standards: Nepal is a member of the International Labour Organization (ILO) and has ratified numerous ILO conventions, including the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), and the abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105).
Forms of Labour Exploitation in Nepal
Bonded Labour: Historically, Nepal has had a significant issue with Kamaiya (bonded labour), where individuals are forced to work for landlords in exchange for a loan or debt that is passed down through generations.
Human Trafficking: Many Nepali women and children are trafficked for forced domestic work, sexual exploitation, and other forms of labour abuse, both within Nepal and abroad.
Migrant Labour Exploitation: Nepali migrant workers, particularly those working in Gulf countries, are often subjected to unsafe working conditions, non-payment of wages, and physical abuse by their employers.
Child Labour: Children are still employed in industries like brick kilns, construction, and agriculture, despite laws prohibiting child labour.
Sexual Exploitation: Women and children are sometimes exploited in commercial sex work under coercive conditions, which is a form of labour exploitation that has been increasing in recent years.
Case Law and Examples of Labour Exploitation and Criminal Prosecutions
Case 1: The Kamaiya Bonded Labour Case (2000s)
Background: The Kamaiya system of bonded labour has been prevalent in the Mid-Western and Far-Western regions of Nepal, where workers (mostly from Dalit and indigenous communities) were forced into debt slavery. They worked on the land of landlords, often under coercive and exploitative conditions, with little hope of ever repaying their debts.
Legal Issues: This case involved issues of forced labour, bonded labour, and violations of human rights. The exploitation of the Kamaiya workers was a direct violation of the Labour Act, 2017, which prohibits forced labour, and the Constitution of Nepal, which guarantees freedom from forced or bonded labour.
Court's Ruling: In 2000, the Nepal Supreme Court issued a landmark decision recognizing the bonded labour system as unconstitutional and ordered the government to take steps to abolish it. Following the ruling, the Kamaiya System was officially outlawed by the Government of Nepal, and efforts were made to rehabilitate former bonded labourers.
Significance: This case was a landmark for labour rights in Nepal, and it led to the Kamaiya Liberation Program to provide compensation, education, and support to freed bonded workers. It also resulted in policy changes to improve the social and economic conditions of marginalized communities.
Case 2: The 2016 Human Trafficking Case in Kathmandu
Background: In 2016, Nepal’s Central Investigation Bureau (CIB) of the Nepal Police uncovered a human trafficking ring that was operating in the capital, Kathmandu. The ring was involved in trafficking young women and children for domestic work in wealthy homes in the Gulf states. Victims were often promised employment and good wages but were subjected to physical abuse, long working hours, and no payment once they arrived in their destination countries.
Legal Issues: The case involved human trafficking, forced labour, and sexual exploitation. The traffickers were violating several provisions under the Human Trafficking and Transportation (Control) Act, 2007, and were charged with abduction and trafficking.
Prosecution: Several members of the trafficking ring were arrested and charged with human trafficking under Nepal’s Criminal Code and Anti-Trafficking Laws. The victims were repatriated to Nepal, and a rescue operation was launched to locate other trafficking victims.
Outcome: The perpetrators of the trafficking ring were convicted, and some were sentenced to long prison terms. The case also sparked national debate about the need for better regulation of migrant labour and the protection of Nepali workers abroad.
Significance: This case raised awareness about the issue of labour exploitation in international migration and prompted the government to strengthen its efforts to prevent trafficking, improve the monitoring of labour recruitment agencies, and offer more support to migrant workers.
Case 3: The 2017 Migrant Worker Abuse Case in Qatar
Background: A Nepali migrant worker, Hari, employed at a construction site in Qatar under the Kafala system (which ties workers to their employer and severely restricts their rights), faced physical abuse, wage theft, and unsafe working conditions. Hari and several other migrant workers filed a complaint with the Nepali embassy and Qatari authorities, claiming their employers had confiscated passports, forced them to work 12-hour shifts without rest, and denied them promised wages.
Legal Issues: The case involved migrant labour exploitation, wage theft, and human rights violations. Nepali workers are protected under the Foreign Employment Act, 2007, which requires foreign employers to abide by fair working conditions and pay agreed wages.
Prosecution: The Nepali government, in cooperation with Qatari authorities, launched an investigation into the abusive practices at the construction site. The case led to the filing of a lawsuit against the employer under both Qatari law and Nepali law for wage theft and exploitation.
Outcome: The workers received compensation, and the employer was fined. The case resulted in greater scrutiny of migrant workers' conditions in Gulf countries and led to policy reforms both in Nepal and Qatar.
Significance: This case is an example of how migrant labour exploitation can be prosecuted through both domestic and international channels. It also highlighted the need for stronger enforcement of labour agreements between countries and the importance of diplomatic channels in protecting Nepali workers abroad.
Case 4: The "Brick Kiln Labour Exploitation" Case (2015)
Background: In 2015, child labour exploitation was discovered in several brick kilns in the Kathmandu Valley. Children, often from marginalized communities, were found working in dangerous conditions—carrying heavy loads, working long hours in hot, dusty environments, and earning very little, often in exchange for food and shelter.
Legal Issues: This case raised serious issues under the Labour Act and Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, both of which prohibit the employment of children under a certain age and mandate safe working conditions.
Prosecution: Government authorities, along with NGOs, conducted raids on brick kilns and identified the employers exploiting children. The owners were prosecuted for child labour exploitation under Nepali law, and many were fined or faced jail sentences.
Outcome: The case led to increased inspections of brick kilns across Nepal and a series of awareness campaigns aimed at educating families and employers about the legal implications of using child labour. Some brick kiln owners were ordered to pay compensation to the exploited children.
Significance: This case served as a strong deterrent against child labour and helped to enforce Nepal’s commitment to international labour standards prohibiting the exploitation of children.
Conclusion
Labour exploitation in Nepal remains a significant challenge despite legislative frameworks aimed at protecting workers. The cases discussed illustrate various forms of exploitation, including forced labour, human trafficking, wage theft, and child labour, and show how the criminal justice system is used to address these issues. The Labour Act, 2017, and the Criminal Code, 2017 provide legal mechanisms for holding perpetrators accountable, but enforcement remains a challenge. As Nepal continues to develop its legal and institutional framework, it is crucial to focus on both strengthening domestic laws and fostering international cooperation to combat the exploitation of workers.
RELATED Blog
comments