Research On Uae Ict Law Enforcement And Tribunal Rulings
1. Defamation via WhatsApp – Device Confiscation and Fine
Facts:
A man in Dubai sent defamatory messages via WhatsApp to a corporate professional, alleging misconduct and spreading false claims.
Legal Issue:
Under UAE Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021 on Cybercrime, sending defamatory content via an information network constitutes a criminal offence.
Tribunal Ruling:
The Dubai court convicted him under Article 43 (defamation via ICT).
Penalties imposed included confiscation of his mobile device, deletion of the messages, a fine of AED 5,000, and a one-month temporary ban from internet usage.
Significance:
Private messages on apps like WhatsApp are not exempt from cybercrime laws.
The ruling demonstrates UAE courts’ willingness to impose technology-specific sanctions, not just fines.
2. Posting Unauthorized Photos – Privacy Violation
Facts:
A man posted photos and videos of a woman on social media without her consent, causing reputational harm and emotional distress.
Legal Issue:
The act violated privacy protections under UAE cybercrime law and could also result in civil liability for emotional harm.
Tribunal Ruling:
The Abu Dhabi court found the defendant guilty of violating privacy provisions.
He was ordered to pay AED 20,000 as compensation for moral and emotional damage.
Significance:
Shows the intersection of criminal and civil liability in UAE ICT law.
Emphasizes the protection of personal data and images against unauthorized online sharing.
3. Defamation via Online Review – Google Reviews Case
Facts:
A man posted a negative review about a nurse on Google, accusing her of professional misconduct.
Legal Issue:
Defamation under the Cybercrime Law, specifically relating to online content accessible publicly.
Tribunal Ruling:
The Dubai Court of Appeals upheld the conviction.
Penalties included a fine (AED 5,000), confiscation of the mobile device, and removal of the defamatory post.
Significance:
Online reviews, even framed as “opinions,” can be criminally actionable if they contain false and defamatory claims.
Reinforces that publicly accessible digital content falls under cybercrime regulations.
4. Online Sexual Exploitation of Minors
Facts:
Eight individuals were involved in sexual exploitation of children through social media and online gaming platforms.
Legal Issue:
Violations of UAE cybercrime law, including exploitation of minors and online child abuse.
Tribunal Ruling:
Convictions resulted in prison sentences ranging from 3 to 15 years.
Fines reached up to AED 1 million.
Additional measures included device confiscation, internet bans, and in some cases, deportation.
Significance:
Illustrates the severe consequences for cybercrimes involving children.
Highlights UAE’s strict enforcement on online platforms to protect minors.
5. Minor Threatening via Social Media – Guardian Liability
Facts:
A minor sent threatening messages to an adult via Snapchat.
Legal Issue:
Cybercrime law and civil liability principles applied, considering the age of the offender.
Tribunal Ruling:
The minor was acknowledged as the perpetrator, but the father (guardian) was held liable for AED 3,000 in civil compensation.
Significance:
Shows how guardians can be held responsible for the cyber actions of minors.
Reinforces that online threats, even by minors, are actionable.
6. Hacking of Government Systems
Facts:
An individual unlawfully accessed government servers, attempting to extract confidential data.
Legal Issue:
Article 2 of UAE Cybercrime Law criminalizes hacking or unauthorized access to information systems, especially government or critical infrastructure.
Tribunal Ruling:
The individual was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and fined AED 100,000.
All devices were confiscated, and access to information networks was prohibited during the sentence.
Significance:
Highlights strict enforcement against cyber intrusions targeting public systems.
Reflects UAE’s commitment to securing government and critical data from cyber threats.
7. Social Media Misinformation
Facts:
Several users spread false news and misleading content on social media that could impact public opinion.
Legal Issue:
Violation of provisions regulating rumors, fake news, and public misinformation under the Cybercrime Law.
Tribunal Ruling:
Users were referred to Federal Public Prosecution.
Penalties included fines, temporary bans from social media platforms, and mandatory removal of content.
Significance:
Demonstrates UAE’s active enforcement of online content standards.
Establishes that misinformation is treated seriously under ICT laws.
Key Takeaways from UAE ICT Law Enforcement:
Wide scope of cybercrime law: Covers defamation, threats, privacy breaches, hacking, child exploitation, and misinformation.
Technology-specific penalties: Confiscation of devices, bans on social media/internet use, and mandatory content removal are common.
Civil remedies complement criminal sanctions: Victims can claim compensation for moral or psychological harm.
Guardian liability: Parents/guardians can be held responsible for minors’ cyber offences.
Strict enforcement for critical systems: Hacking or unauthorized access of government systems leads to severe punishments.
RELATED Blog
comments