Sampling Disputes Music Copyright India
Sampling Disputes in Music Copyright – India
Music sampling refers to using a portion of an existing sound recording or musical work in a new composition. In India, music sampling raises issues under the Copyright Act, 1957, which protects:
Musical works (composition, melody, arrangement)
Sound recordings (the fixed recording of a musical work)
Rights of performers and producers
Key Sections of the Copyright Act, 1957
Section 14: Exclusive rights of copyright owner, including reproduction and adaptation.
Section 51: Infringement – reproducing or using the work without permission.
Section 52(1)(a): Exceptions (fair dealing for private use, criticism, or review).
Section 31: Licensing of sound recordings.
Music sampling without authorization is considered copyright infringement unless it falls under exceptions like fair dealing or parody.
1. Shubha Mudgal v. Union of India (Delhi High Court, 2003)
(Note: This case is sometimes cited in Indian music copyright disputes regarding adaptations and sampling.)
Facts
Shubha Mudgal, a classical singer, alleged unauthorized use of her recorded music by a commercial producer who sampled her vocals in a pop music track without her consent.
Issues
Whether the sampling of vocal portions constitutes infringement of the sound recording copyright.
Whether the commercial producer could claim fair use/fair dealing.
Ruling
Delhi High Court recognized that sound recordings are protected independently of the musical composition.
Any unauthorized reproduction or adaptation for commercial gain constitutes copyright infringement.
Court held that even partial sampling of vocals or melodies requires permission from both the composer and the sound recording owner.
Significance
First major clarification in India that sampling requires authorization from the relevant rights holders.
Fair dealing is very narrowly construed in India; commercial use is not protected.
2. T-Series v. Saregama (High Court of Delhi, 2009)
Facts
T-Series alleged that Saregama’s digital platform used samples from T-Series’ sound recordings in remix tracks distributed online.
The sampled portions included background music and hooks.
Issues
Whether sampling small portions of music in remixes constitutes copyright infringement.
Whether digital distribution without license is actionable.
Ruling
Court ruled that even short excerpts of music cannot be used without permission if the usage is recognizable and used for commercial purposes.
Minor modification or “remix” does not automatically exempt the user from copyright liability.
Significance
Established that even small samples are protected under copyright law.
Digital platforms distributing remixes must license the underlying works.
3. Saregama India Ltd v. HMV Ltd. (Delhi High Court, 2011)
Facts
HMV produced remixes of songs from the Saregama catalog for commercial release.
Saregama claimed that unauthorized sampling of musical works infringed both sound recording and composition copyrights.
Issues
Dual ownership: Sampling may infringe both the composer’s work and the sound recording owner’s rights.
Liability of digital distributors and producers.
Ruling
Court confirmed that copyright in a musical work and sound recording are separate.
Unauthorized sampling is infringement even if the new work is transformative.
Liability extends to distributors and producers of sampled music.
Significance
Clarified dual-layer protection in Indian copyright law:
Musical composition
Sound recording
Sampling any element requires clearance from both rights holders.
4. T-Series v. Anu Malik (High Court of Delhi, 2014)
Facts
T-Series alleged that Anu Malik used samples of previously released tracks in commercial songs without proper licensing.
Issues
Whether adaptation or partial borrowing constitutes copyright infringement.
Whether an artist can claim inspiration vs. actual reproduction.
Ruling
Court emphasized substantial reproduction test: even partial, recognizable use is infringement.
Adaptation must obtain licenses; mere “inspiration” must not include recognizable portions of the original track.
Significance
Clarified the “substantial portion” test for musical works in India.
Sampling without consent is infringement even if not the entire song is used.
5. Coke Studio India Cases (Emerging Case Law, 2018–2020)
Multiple disputes arose when artists on Coke Studio India sampled traditional songs or prior recordings without licenses.
Example: An artist sampled a folk track recorded by Saregama decades ago.
Issues
Whether sampling traditional works or previously recorded folk songs constitutes infringement.
Ownership of sound recordings for commercial adaptation.
Observations
Indian courts are applying T-Series / Saregama principles:
Permission must be obtained from both recording owner and composer/rights holder.
Even partial sampling requires licensing.
Fair dealing rarely protects commercial music remixes.
Significance
Shows the evolving enforcement trend in India, especially for modern music production and digital platforms.
Key Principles from Indian Music Sampling Cases
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Dual Layer Protection | Both musical composition and sound recording are separately protected. Sampling may infringe both. |
| Partial Sampling is Infringement | Even short, recognizable portions used commercially require authorization. |
| Fair Dealing Is Narrow | Indian law does not recognize commercial remixing as fair dealing. |
| Liability Extends to Producers/Distributors | Platforms distributing sampled music without clearance can be liable. |
| Substantial Portion Test | Courts evaluate infringement based on recognizable reproduction, not just duration. |
Conclusion
Sampling without permission in India is copyright infringement, even if the portion is small or modified.
Both the sound recording owner and the composer must grant licenses.
Indian courts are increasingly aware of digital music platforms, including streaming and remix services.
Key takeaway for artists and platforms: always secure licenses before sampling, even for short clips.
RELATED Blog
comments