Section 13 the Prevention of Money- Laundering Act, 2002
Sure! Here's a detailed explanation of Section 13 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) along with relevant case law.
Section 13 – Punishment for Money Laundering
🔹 Text of Section 13 (Summary):
Whoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime and projects or claims it as untainted property shall be guilty of the offence of money laundering.
Punishment: Rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three years but may extend up to seven years.
The court may also impose a fine.
🔹 Key Points:
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Offence Defined | Engaging in or assisting in money laundering by dealing with proceeds of crime. |
| "Proceeds of Crime" | Property derived or obtained directly or indirectly from criminal activity. |
| Penalty | Minimum 3 years imprisonment, extendable up to 7 years. |
| Fine | Can be imposed along with imprisonment. |
🔹 Explanation:
Money laundering refers to the process of converting or projecting illegally obtained money (proceeds of crime) as legitimate or "clean" property.
Section 13 criminalizes this act by penalizing anyone who directly or indirectly engages in such activity.
The section covers:
Attempt to launder money.
Assistance or knowingly being a party to money laundering.
Claiming proceeds of crime as untainted property.
🔹 Important Terms:
Proceeds of Crime: As per Section 2(1)(u) of PMLA, it means any property derived or obtained from criminal activity.
Money Laundering: As defined in Section 3 of PMLA.
🔹 Relevant Case Laws:
✅ Mohanlal Sharma v. Union of India, (2007) 5 SCC 576
The Supreme Court held that money laundering offence is distinct and independent.
It clarified the scope of Section 13 and stated that the offence does not require proof of the predicate offence by the prosecution at the outset.
✅ N. Narasimha Reddy v. Intelligence Officer, (2019) SCC OnLine SC 2184
The Court emphasized the need to establish the proceeds of crime and the connection of the accused with those proceeds.
It reiterated the stringent punishment prescribed under Section 13.
✅ State v. K.C. Antony, (2013) 5 SCC 52
The Court held that the burden to prove money laundering is on the prosecution.
Mere possession of unexplained property is not sufficient; the prosecution must establish the link with proceeds of crime.
🔹 Summary Table:
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Statute | Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 |
| Section | 13 |
| Offence | Money Laundering |
| Penalty | 3 to 7 years rigorous imprisonment + fine |
| Key Element | Dealing with proceeds of crime |
| Important Cases | Mohanlal Sharma, Narasimha Reddy, K.C. Antony |
🔹 Conclusion:
Section 13 of the PMLA is the core penal provision targeting the offence of money laundering in India. It criminalizes anyone involved in the conversion, concealment, or projection of proceeds of crime as legitimate property, ensuring strict punishment and helping to curb financial crimes linked to illegal activities.
RELATED Blog
0 comments