Section 17 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023
Section 17 — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023
Title of Section 17
“Mistake of Fact”
Substance of Section 17
Section 17 of the BNS, 2023 provides:
Nothing is an offence which is done under a mistake of fact, provided the act is done in good faith and the mistake is such that, if the facts were as the person believed them to be, the act would have been lawful.
In simpler terms:
A person is not criminally liable if they commit an act by honestly believing certain facts to be true, and if those facts were indeed as believed, the act would have been lawful.
This is known as the defense of mistake of fact.
Purpose and Rationale
The rationale behind Section 17 is:
To prevent punishing honest mistakes – criminal law targets culpable intent, not errors made in good faith.
To distinguish between criminal intent (mens rea) and accidental errors – an honest mistake of fact negates the intent needed for a crime.
To ensure fairness in justice – punishing someone who acted on a reasonable belief would be unjust.
Essential Elements of Section 17
For protection under Section 17, the following elements must exist:
1. Honest Belief
The accused must genuinely believe in the facts as they perceived them.
The belief must not be contrived to avoid liability.
2. Mistake Must Be About Facts, Not Law
The section applies only to mistake of fact, not mistake of law.
Example: Believing a person is your friend (fact) is a mistake of fact; believing stealing is legal is a mistake of law.
3. Act Must Be Lawful If Belief Were True
If the facts were as the accused believed, the act must be lawful.
This ensures that the defense is not misused to commit illegal acts.
4. Good Faith
The act must be done in good faith – with honest intention, without malice or criminal motive.
Illustrations
Illustration 1 – Taking Property Believed to Be Yours
A mistakenly takes B’s umbrella believing it to be his own.
Act is done honestly under a mistake of fact.
No criminal liability under Section 17.
Illustration 2 – Self-Defense
A strikes B believing B is attacking him.
If the belief that B is attacking is honest, and the response is proportionate, Section 17 applies.
No criminal liability.
Illustration 3 – Mistaken Identity
A fires at a person believing him to be an attacker, but it turns out to be a harmless bystander.
If A’s belief was honest and reasonable, the act may be excused under Section 17.
Scope and Limitations
Mistake of Fact vs. Negligence:
Section 17 does not protect negligent or careless errors. Only honest and reasonable mistakes are covered.
Mistake of Law:
Believing that an illegal act is legal is not excusable under Section 17.
Crimes Requiring Strict Liability:
For offences that do not require intent (strict liability), Section 17 may not provide a defense.
Legal Implications
Negates Mens Rea
Mistake of fact prevents the formation of criminal intent, which is essential for most offences.
Applicable Across BNS Offences
Can apply to theft, assault, trespass, or other offences where intent is a key element.
Burden of Proof
The accused must demonstrate the honesty and reasonableness of the belief.
Key Takeaways
Section 17 BNS protects honest mistakes of fact done in good faith.
It does not excuse negligence, recklessness, or mistakes of law.
The act must be lawful if the facts were as believed.
This section ensures fairness by distinguishing intention from honest error.
RELATED Blog
comments