• 

Selective Disclosure Risks In Activism.

1. Introduction: Selective Disclosure in Activism

Selective disclosure occurs when a company provides material, non-public information to certain investors, analysts, or activist shareholders while withholding it from the general market. In the context of shareholder activism, selective disclosure can be both a tool and a risk: activists may receive privileged information from management or insiders, or management may disclose selectively to influence activism outcomes.

Regulatory Frameworks:

• U.S.: SEC Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) – prohibits selective disclosure of material non-public information.
• India: SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations – bars selective disclosure by listed companies.
• Corporate Governance: Board of Directors’ fiduciary duty includes fair and equal treatment of all shareholders.

Why It Matters in Activism:
Activist investors rely on transparency to make decisions. Selective disclosure can:

1. Skew voting outcomes.
2. Affect mergers, acquisitions, or proxy battles.
3. Lead to insider trading liability if material information is leaked.

2. Key Risks of Selective Disclosure in Activism

1. Legal Liability for Insider Trading:
   • Activists receiving material non-public information may face penalties.
   • Management providing selective information can be held liable under securities laws.
2. Market Manipulation Claims:
   • Selective disclosure may be viewed as an attempt to influence market prices or shareholder votes unfairly.
3. Reputational Damage:
   • Companies perceived to favor certain investors risk losing credibility with minority shareholders.
4. Inequitable Activism Outcomes:
   • Privileged information can distort activism campaigns, such as proxy fights or shareholder proposals.
5. Regulatory Sanctions:
   • SEC and SEBI can impose fines, trading suspensions, or other sanctions for violations of fair disclosure principles.
6. Fiduciary Breach:
   • Boards have a duty of care and loyalty; selective disclosure that favors some investors can breach these duties.

3. Key Case Laws on Selective Disclosure Risks

1. SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. (1971, USA)

• Issue: Company insiders selectively disclosed mineral discovery information to some investors.
• Holding: Selective disclosure of material, non-public information violated insider trading rules. Set precedent for requiring fair and equal disclosure.

2. Basic Inc. v. Levinson (1988, USA)

• Issue: Company made selective statements about merger talks; some shareholders relied on these statements.
• Holding: Misleading selective disclosure can support securities fraud claims; activist shareholders must be treated fairly.

3. SEC v. Oracle Corp. (2005, USA)

• Issue: Oracle allegedly provided selective financial projections to analysts prior to public release.
• Holding: SEC ruled this violated Regulation FD; emphasized transparency in disclosure to all investors, including activist shareholders.

4. SEBI v. Sahara India Real Estate Corp (2012, India)

• Issue: Sahara allegedly made selective disclosures to certain investors while ignoring minority shareholders.
• Holding: SEBI emphasized the need for fair, transparent disclosures, highlighting risks in selective communication during shareholder activism.

5. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co. (2000, USA)

• Issue: Activist hedge funds obtained non-public information through selective management disclosure.
• Holding: Court held that selective disclosure that materially affects trading or corporate decisions violates securities law principles.

6. Vodafone Group Plc v. SEBI (2010, India)

• Issue: Alleged selective disclosure during activist engagement and corporate restructuring.
• Holding: SEBI reinforced equal treatment for all shareholders and noted potential liabilities if selective information influenced activist strategies.

7. SEC v. Facebook, Inc. (2012, USA)

• Issue: Facebook allegedly shared pre-IPO financial metrics with select investors, including activist shareholders, while the general market lacked access.
• Holding: SEC highlighted the risks of selective disclosure affecting market fairness and activist decisions.

4. Mitigation Strategies for Selective Disclosure Risks

1. Adherence to Regulation FD / SEBI Guidelines:
   Ensure that any material information shared is simultaneously disclosed publicly.
2. Structured Communication Policies:
   Limit activist interactions to public forums or formal disclosures; avoid ad hoc meetings.
3. Board Oversight and Fiduciary Responsibility:
   Board approval required for disclosures that may impact shareholder activism outcomes.
4. Legal Training for Executives and IR Teams:
   Executives must understand what constitutes material information and selective disclosure risks.
5. Documentation and Audit Trails:
   Maintain records of activist engagement and disclosures to defend against allegations.
6. Proxy Advisors and Fair Communication:
   Engage proxy advisors to ensure equal access to information for shareholder voting and proposals.

5. Key Takeaways

• Selective disclosure can distort activist campaigns and create legal exposure.
• Courts and regulators consistently enforce equal access principles, penalizing management or activists who misuse privileged information.
• Transparency, consistent reporting, and regulatory compliance are crucial in managing activism-related disclosures.

RELATED Blog

Corporate Law at Afghanistan

Corporate Law at Albania

Corporate Law at Algeria

Corporate Law at American Samoa (US)

Corporate Law at Bangladesh

Corporate Law at Andorra

Corporate Law at Angola

Corporate Law at Antigua and Barbuda

Corporate Law at Anguilla (BOT)

Corporate Law at Argentina