Service Marks And Collective Marks.
1. Service Marks
Definition:
A Service Mark is similar to a trademark but is used to identify and distinguish services (rather than goods) provided by a business. It indicates the origin of services rather than products.
Governed under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 in India.
Can be registered for any service, e.g., hospitality, finance, education, healthcare, software services.
Key Points:
Protects brand identity for services.
Can be used as ™ before registration and ® after registration.
Infringement occurs if a similar mark is used for similar services, causing confusion.
Important Case Laws:
Case 1: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Sanjay Dalia & Ors. (2003)
Facts: Indian Performing Rights Society (IPRS) registered service marks for music licensing services. Sanjay Dalia used a similar mark to offer competing services.
Issue: Whether service mark infringement occurred.
Decision: Court held that service marks have the same legal protection as trademarks. Confusion among the public due to similarity was sufficient to establish infringement.
Significance: Affirmed that service marks are enforceable, and protection is based on likelihood of confusion, not just identical use.
Case 2: Taj Mahal Hotel v. Gopal & Co.
Facts: Taj Mahal Hotel, Mumbai, registered its name and logo as a service mark for hospitality. Gopal & Co. opened a hotel using “Taj Mahal” in its name.
Issue: Can a hotel name be protected under service marks?
Decision: Court restrained Gopal & Co. from using the name, holding it infringed the registered service mark.
Significance: Established that famous service marks enjoy strong protection against misuse in the same or related field.
Case 3: Infosys Technologies Ltd. v. Vikas Infrastructure Ltd.
Facts: Infosys had a service mark for IT consulting services. Vikas Infrastructure used a similar mark for technology services.
Decision: The court ruled in favor of Infosys, emphasizing the reputation of the mark and potential confusion.
Significance: Even in IT and service industries, service mark infringement protects goodwill.
Case 4: Indian Airlines Ltd. v. K.S. Subramaniam
Facts: Indian Airlines had a service mark for air transport services. The defendant used a confusingly similar mark in airline ticketing.
Decision: Court held it was infringement.
Significance: Reinforced that service marks prevent unauthorized use in related service domains, even if not identical.
Case 5: Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. Maruti Car Rentals
Facts: Maruti Udyog, a car manufacturer, had a service mark for automotive services. The defendant offered car rental using the mark.
Decision: Court held that the service mark extended to related automobile services, preventing dilution.
Significance: Highlighted expansion of protection to related services, not just identical services.
2. Collective Marks
Definition:
A Collective Mark is a mark used by members of an association, cooperative, or organization to indicate membership or quality standard of goods/services.
Unlike regular trademarks, it identifies members of a group, not a single entity.
Examples: Co-operative societies, Chambers of Commerce, trade associations.
Key Points:
Indicates origin, quality, or membership.
Can be registered under the Trade Marks Act.
Protects members’ right to use mark; non-members are restricted.
Important Case Laws:
Case 1: Amul Cooperative v. Super Dairy Ltd.
Facts: Amul registered its mark as a collective mark for cooperative dairy products. Super Dairy used a similar mark to sell milk products.
Decision: Court ruled it was infringement because only members of Amul cooperative could use the collective mark.
Significance: Reinforced the exclusive rights of members under a collective mark.
Case 2: All India Handicrafts Manufacturers’ Association v. XYZ Exports
Facts: Association registered a collective mark to certify handicrafts from India. XYZ Exports, not a member, used the mark.
Decision: Court prohibited use, emphasizing the mark represents origin and authenticity.
Significance: Collective marks protect quality assurance and authenticity.
Case 3: Indian National Bar Association v. Unknown
Facts: The Association had a collective mark for membership certification. Some non-members used the mark.
Decision: Court restrained unauthorized usage.
Significance: Collective marks can protect organizational reputation and prevent misrepresentation.
Case 4: Coffee Board of India v. Local Traders
Facts: Coffee Board registered “Indian Coffee” as a collective mark. Local traders exported coffee under this mark without authorization.
Decision: Court ruled only authorized exporters could use the collective mark.
Significance: Collective marks ensure regulated use for geographic or quality branding.
Case 5: Co-operative Milk Producers Union v. Local Dairy Co.
Facts: Union registered collective mark “Happy Cow Milk” for member products. Local dairy started using the same mark.
Decision: Court restrained unauthorized use.
Significance: Collective marks protect consumer trust and prevent dilution of cooperative brands.
3. Key Differences Between Service Marks & Collective Marks
| Feature | Service Marks | Collective Marks |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Identify services of a single entity | Indicate membership/quality by a group |
| Ownership | Single business/entity | Association, cooperative, or society |
| Scope | Only for services | Goods/services by members |
| Protection | Against infringement & confusion | Against unauthorized use by non-members |
| Example | “Taj Hotels” for hospitality services | “Amul” for cooperative dairy products |
✅ Summary
Service Marks: Protect brands offering services. Cases emphasize protection against confusion, reputation, and goodwill.
Collective Marks: Protect marks of organizations for members’ use. Cases emphasize authenticity, quality, and member rights.
Both are critical tools in IPR portfolio management and brand protection.
RELATED Blog
comments