Sexual Offences Under Finnish Criminal Law
1. Legal Framework for Sexual Offences in Finland
Sexual offences in Finland are primarily governed by Chapter 20 of the Finnish Criminal Code (Rikoslaki, 1889/39). Key provisions include:
1.1. Rape (Section 20:1, 20:1a)
Definition: Engaging in sexual intercourse or comparable sexual activity with another person by using violence, threat, or taking advantage of a helpless situation.
Aggravated rape: More severe circumstances, such as serious injury or multiple perpetrators.
Penalties: imprisonment 2–6 years, aggravated rape 4–10 years.
1.2. Sexual Coercion (Section 20:2)
Forcing someone to other sexual acts than intercourse by violence, threat, or exploiting helplessness.
1.3. Sexual Abuse (Section 20:7–20:8)
Sexual acts against minors (under 16), including exploitation and grooming.
Aggravated sexual abuse includes serious violence or repeated acts.
1.4. Other offences
Incest, sexual harassment, exploitation of prostitution.
Penalties vary depending on age, consent, and coercion.
1.5. Key Principles
Consent is central: acts without consent constitute a criminal offence.
Age is a factor: sexual acts with minors (under 16) are generally prohibited.
Vulnerability or helplessness increases liability.
2. Finnish Supreme Court (KKO) Cases on Sexual Offences
Here are six significant cases that illustrate how sexual offences are treated in Finnish law:
Case 1: KKO 1996:101 – Rape Using Threat
Facts:
Defendant threatened the victim with physical violence to engage in sexual intercourse.
Issue:
Does using psychological threats constitute rape?
Decision:
KKO confirmed that threats causing fear of immediate violence fulfill the requirement for rape.
Defendant convicted of rape.
Significance:
Reinforces that physical force is not required, threats are sufficient to remove consent.
Case 2: KKO 2000:72 – Exploitation of a Helpless Person
Facts:
Defendant had sexual intercourse with a victim who was heavily intoxicated and incapable of resisting.
Issue:
Can a person take advantage of intoxication to commit sexual assault?
Decision:
KKO ruled that taking advantage of helplessness qualifies as rape under Section 20:1.
Conviction upheld.
Significance:
Emphasizes the principle that consent must be informed and voluntary.
Case 3: KKO 2005:45 – Aggravated Sexual Abuse of a Minor
Facts:
Adult repeatedly abused a 14-year-old over several months.
Issue:
Is repeated sexual abuse of a minor considered aggravated?
Decision:
KKO held that repeated acts, combined with the victim’s age and coercion, constitute aggravated sexual abuse.
Sentenced to a higher term than standard sexual abuse.
Significance:
Clarifies factors leading to aggravation: repetition, age difference, vulnerability.
Case 4: KKO 2009:38 – Sexual Coercion Without Physical Contact
Facts:
Defendant forced the victim to engage in sexual acts by threatening exposure of private information.
Issue:
Can non-physical coercion amount to a sexual offence?
Decision:
KKO confirmed that coercion through threats, even without physical force, satisfies sexual coercion under Section 20:2.
Significance:
Broadened understanding of coercion: psychological threats are actionable.
Case 5: KKO 2013:47 – Sexual Offence in a Position of Trust
Facts:
Teacher engaged in sexual activity with a student aged 15.
Issue:
Does a position of authority aggravate liability?
Decision:
KKO held that exploiting a position of trust constitutes aggravated sexual abuse, even if sexual acts seem consensual due to age and authority imbalance.
Significance:
Establishes that power imbalance increases culpability, particularly for minors.
Case 6: KKO 2017:59 – Rape with Multiple Perpetrators
Facts:
Victim sexually assaulted by two defendants acting together.
Issue:
Are both perpetrators individually liable for aggravated rape?
Decision:
KKO convicted both, noting that joint planning and execution increase severity.
Significance:
Shows Finnish law treats multiple perpetrators seriously, often leading to aggravated charges.
3. Key Takeaways from Finnish Case Law
Consent and helplessness are central: Any sexual activity without free and informed consent is criminal.
Threats or psychological coercion suffice for rape or sexual coercion.
Aggravating factors: Minor’s age, repetition, position of authority, multiple perpetrators.
Indirect or repeated offences can escalate the charge from standard sexual abuse to aggravated.
Position of trust matters: Teachers, caregivers, or authority figures face harsher penalties.
4. Illustrative Hypothetical Scenarios
Intimidates a victim into sex using a knife → rape (KKO 1996:101).
Sexual intercourse with intoxicated person → rape due to helplessness (KKO 2000:72).
Repeated abuse of a 14-year-old over months → aggravated sexual abuse (KKO 2005:45).
Threatens to leak private info to coerce sexual acts → sexual coercion (KKO 2009:38).
Teacher has sexual contact with student → aggravated sexual abuse (KKO 2013:47).
Gang sexual assault → aggravated rape for all perpetrators (KKO 2017:59).
✅ Summary
Finnish law criminalizes sexual offences involving lack of consent, coercion, and exploitation.
KKO case law emphasizes that physical violence is not necessary; threats, helplessness, and abuse of authority are sufficient.
Aggravated offences result from repetition, age differences, multiple perpetrators, or positions of trust.
Courts focus on intent, consent, vulnerability, and context in determining liability and severity.
RELATED Blog
comments